Indicating website reputations during user interactions

ABSTRACT

An aspect of the present invention relates to methods and systems involving receiving an indicator of an attempted interaction of a user with an item of website content and presenting one or more indicia of a website&#39;s reputation to the user attempting to interact with the website content. The act of presenting the indicia may be in response to the user&#39;s attempted interaction with the website.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of the following commonly-owned U.S.provisional patent applications, each of which is incorporated herein byreference in its entirety: U.S. Prov. App. No. 60/677,786, filed on May3, 2005 and U.S. Prov. App. No. 60/691,349, filed on Jun. 16, 2005.

This application is also related to the following commonly owned patentapplications, filed on even date herewith, each incorporated herein byreference in its entirety: An application entitled “INDICATING WEBSITEREPUTATIONS DURING WEBSITE MANIPULATION OF USER INFORMATION” AttorneyDocket No. INFC-0003-P02; “INDICATING WEBSITE REPUTATIONS DURING ANELECTRONIC COMMERCE TRANSACTION” Attorney Docket No. INFC-0003-P03;“INDICATING WEBSITE REPUTATIONS BASED ON WEBSITE HANDLING OF PERSONALINFORMATION” Attorney Docket No. INFC-0003-P04; “INDICATING WEBSITEREPUTATIONS WITHIN SEARCH RESULTS” Attorney Docket No. INFC-0003-P05;“DETERMINING WEBSITE REPUTATIONS USING AUTOMATIC TESTING” AttorneyDocket No. INFC-0003-P06; “WEBSITE REPUTATION PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE”Attorney Docket No. INFC-0003-P07; and “REPUTATION OF AN ENTITYASSOCIATED WITH A CONTENT ITEM” Attorney Docket No. INFC-0003-P08.

BACKGROUND

1. Field

This invention relates to the field of reputation services, and, moreparticularly to real-time, reputation-based Web services.

2. Description of the Related Art

As the World Wide Web grows, so do the dangers exposed to computer usersand computing devices. These dangers come in many forms from viruses andmalware adapted to disable computers; to spyware, adware, and programsadapted to track and steal personal information; to spam, junk mail, andprograms designed to invade the user experience for commercial purposes.There are several solutions provided to detect and remove such softwarefrom a computer device, and there are firewalls and browser settingsmeant to prevent certain interactions. However, there exists a need toprovide enhanced security for users of computer devices.

SUMMARY

Systems and methods for providing a Web reputation service aredisclosed. The Web reputation service may comprise a real time databasequery interface for looking up the reputation of Web content, such as aWeb site, a script, an executable application, a Web form, and so forth.A database may contain the reputation, which may be based upon a linkstructure analysis; a white list; a black list; a heuristic; anautomatic test; a dynamic analysis of an executable application, orscript; a static analysis of an executable application or script; ananalysis of an end user license agreement; a determination of adistinguishing characteristic of a Web site, such as a business model ora genre; the result of a Web crawl; the output of a machine learningfacility; user contributed feedback; and so forth. The systems andmethods may intervene to prevent or allow certain features associatedwith Web content, such as adware, spyware, spam, phishing, pop ups,cookies, ActiveX components, client-side scripting, uploading files,downloading files, providing personal information, providing personal orfinancial information to a Website that intends to commit fraud,purchasing products from an e-commerce Website that is deemed high risk,and so forth. The Web reputation service may be embodied as a serviceproviding information about the safety or trustworthiness of a Web site;a filter applied to Web search results; a ranking of Web search results;an advertising network that checks the reputation before placing an adon the Web site; an advertising network that checks the reputationbefore accepting an ad that would direct a user to the destination Website; a desktop proxy facility that uses the reputation to filterrequests; a network proxy facility that uses the reputation to filterrequests; a Web navigation guide that directs a user to “the best” Webdestinations and away from “the worst” Web destinations, where what isconsidered “the best” and “the worst” may be determined solely by thereputation of, or by a combination of the reputation and data associatedwith, the user; an analysis presentment facility that shows a user how areputation was determined; an alternate-Web-content presentment facilitythat provides a user with a reference to alternate Web content with agood reputation when the user requests Web content with a badreputation; and so forth.

The several objects and features of the systems disclosed may includethe provision of a Web reputation service; the provision of a real timedatabase query interface for lookup up the reputation of Web content,such as a Web site, an executable application, a script, a Web form, andso forth; the caching of the results of this real time database locallyon client computers to improve performance; the provision of a databasecontaining the reputation; the provision of various Web content analysisfacilities for determining the reputation of Web content; and theprovision of applications of the Web reputation service.

Briefly stated, the reputation of Web content is determined primarily bya Web content analysis facility. This facility, in conducting Webcontent analysis, may inspect the Web content directly or may makedeductions about the Web content, especially deductions that relate to alink structure associated with the Web content. The validitydetermination may, from time to time, be updated by the analysisfacility. In any case, the determination is stored in a database that isaccessible via a real time database query interface.

In embodiments, users may have the ability to “vote” about sites/contentas well, and a reputation facility according to the principles of thepresent invention may use this as another source of input. Inembodiments, a user may provide information relating to the performanceof his or her computer or other related system following interactionwith a certain site and thus provide performance information relating tothe site. This performance information may then be used to generatereputation information about the site.

A Web reputation service may comprise the Web content analysis facility,the database, and the real time database query interface. Inembodiments, the Web reputation service may comprise, withoutlimitation, a service providing information about the safety ortrustworthiness of a Web site; a filter applied to Web search results; aranking of Web search results; an advertising network that checks thereputation before placing an ad on the Web site; an advertising networkthat checks the reputation before accepting an ad that would direct auser to the destination Web site; a desktop proxy facility that uses thereputation to filter requests; a network proxy facility that uses thereputation to filter requests; or a Web navigation guide that directs auser to “the best” Web destinations and away from “the worst” Webdestinations, where what is considered “the best” and “the worst” may bedetermined solely by the reputation of, or by a combination of thereputation and data associated with, the user; an analysis presentmentfacility that shows a user how a reputation was determined; or analternate-Web-content presentment facility that provides a user with areference to alternate Web content with a good reputation when the userrequests Web content with a bad reputation.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve a real time database queryinterface for looking up the reputation of Web content.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve providing a link structureanalysis for the purpose of determining the reputation of Web content.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve using a white list inconjunction with the reputation of Web content.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve automatically finding andtest Web content, with the result of the test being a measure of thereputation of the Web content.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve providing a reference toalternative Web content with a good reputation when requested Webcontent has a bad reputation.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve automatically extractinginformation from an end user license agreement, where the informationpertains to how personal information is treated.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve utilizing Web crawling todetect a business model of a Web site.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve presenting inventions toutilize Web crawling to detect the genre of a Web site.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve utilizing Web crawling todetermine the reputation of a Web advertisement network or thereputation of an individual advertisement, group of advertisements,publisher of advertisements, originator of advertisements, and the like.For example, Google may be a highly reputable advertising network, butone in a million advertisements they accept may be an advertisement thatclaims to be Citigroup and which directs users to a Website in Chinathat intends to steal their bank account information. Informationpertaining to this type of advertisement may be used to generate anadvertisement reputation according to the principles of the presentinvention.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve utilizing a machine-learningalgorithm in the process of determining the reputation of Web content.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve providing a Web reputationservice.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve providing a Web searchassociated with the quality of Web content.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve providing an advertisingnetwork that declines to advertise Web content of ill repute.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve providing an advertisingnetwork that declines to associate an advertisement with Web content ofill repute.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve providing a desktop proxyfacility that uses the reputation of Web content to filter requests.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve providing a network proxyfacility that uses the reputation of Web content to filter requests.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve providing a Web navigationguide that directs a user to “the best” Web destinations and away from“the worst” Web destinations, where what is considered “the best” and“the worst” may be determined solely by the reputation of, or by acombination of the reputation and data associated with, the user.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve providing an analysispresentment facility that shows a user how a reputation was determined.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve providing analternate-Web-content presentment facility that provides a user with areference to alternate Web content with a good reputation when the userrequests Web content with a bad reputation.

An embodiment of the present invention is a system and method forinteracting with a network. The system and method may involve providinga Web reputation service to alert a user of a Web site reputation duringthe attempted interaction with the Web site, wherein the user uses acell phone to interact with the Web site.

An embodiment of the present invention is a system and method forinteracting with a network. The system and method may involve providinga Web reputation service to alert a user about a Web site reputationduring the attempted interaction with the Web site, wherein the Websitereputation service is provided in conjunction with software adapted toscan the user's local hard drives for a virus.

In embodiments, a method and system disclosed herein may includereceiving an indicator of an attempted interaction of a user with anitem of website content and presenting one or more indicia of awebsite's reputation to the user attempting to interact with the websitecontent; the act of presenting the indicia is in response to the user'sattempted interaction with the website.

In embodiments, in methods and systems the indicia may be providedthrough a reputation indicator within a graphical user interface. Thereputation indicator may be presented on a tool bar, on a menu bar, oron a navigation bar. The reputation indicator may be updated upon eachattempted website interaction. The update may involve receivinginformation from a reputation service. The reputation service may employa reputation server.

In embodiments, in methods and systems the indicia of the website'sreputation may include indicia of a website's reputation for treatmentof personal information, of a website's reputation for providingunwanted content, of a website's reputation for providing malware, of awebsite's reputation for providing spam, of a website's reputation forproviding phishing, or of a website's reputation of being a decoy.

In embodiments, the method and system may further include presenting theuser with at least one alternative recommendation. The at least onealternative recommendation may include a recommended website.

In embodiments, in methods and systems the user may be prevented frominteracting with the website. The user may be permitted to interact withthe website following an interaction with a reputation acknowledgement.

In embodiments, in methods and systems the presentation may involvepresenting an indication within the GUI associated with the webpage. Theuser may be permitted to continue to interact with the webpage.

In embodiments, in methods and systems the presentation of the indiciamay follow the interaction. The interaction may be a preliminaryinteraction. The interaction may be a false interaction. The user mayproceed with a real interaction following interaction with a reputationindication window.

In embodiments, in methods and systems the step of presenting mayinclude presenting audio information. The step of presenting may includepresenting visual information.

In embodiments, in methods and systems the interaction may includeaccessing the website.

In embodiments, in methods and systems the presentation may involvepresenting a warning of a poor reputation, an unknown reputation, or agood reputation.

In an embodiment, the method and system may further include presentingthe indicia to mobile users. The mobile users may be mobile phone users.

In embodiments, in methods and systems the indicia may include evidenceof the reputation, an indication of the number of pop-ups that may bereceived, the category of site, how the user's personal information maybe used, how many email may be typically received, an indication ofunwanted content that may be received, or an indication that the websitemay exploit a user. The exploit may be an expectation of the user'spersonal information. The exploit may be an expectation of the user'sfinancial information.

In embodiments, in methods and systems the evidence may include anexpectation that the website may attempt to change a user's web browsersetting. The evidence may include a website that looks like an affiliateor business partner of an unfavorable website.

In embodiments, in methods and systems the indicia may include analternative. The alternative may relate to an alternative website. Thealternative may relate to an alternative email. The alternative emailmay be a temporary email to be used for the current interaction. Thealternative may relate to an alternative credit card. The alternativecredit card may be a temporary credit card to be used for the currentinteraction. The alternative may relate to an alternative program.

In embodiments, in methods and systems the indicia may includeinformation in an increasingly vocal manner. As the user gets closer tocommitting the dangerous act warnings may become increasingly alarming.

These and other systems, methods, objects, features, and advantages ofthe present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art fromthe following detailed description of the preferred embodiment and thedrawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The foregoing and other objects and advantages of the invention will beappreciated more fully from the following further description thereof,with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:

FIG. 1 illustrates a high level schematic of various components that cansupport an interactive reputation-based platform for providingreputation-based methods and systems.

FIG. 2 illustrates certain processes with which a reputation service maybe employed.

FIG. 3 illustrates a client interacting with a reputation server andanother server in a variety of ways.

FIG. 4 illustrates a process for alerting a user to a Web reputation.

FIG. 5 illustrates a process for alerting a user that is associated withsubmitting information through a Website.

FIG. 6 illustrates a Web browser with a reputation toolbar button andstatus indicator.

FIG. 7 illustrates an informational transaction message.

FIG. 8 illustrates a download transaction message.

FIG. 9 depicts a Web with a reputation information bar.

FIG. 10 illustrates a reputation menu button.

FIG. 11 illustrates an in-page message.

FIG. 12 illustrates a transaction alert for unsafe e-commerce, spammer,decoy, and phishing.

FIG. 13 illustrates a transaction alert for downloads.

FIG. 14 illustrates a transaction alert for adware sites.

FIG. 15 illustrates a transaction alert for decoy sites.

FIG. 16 illustrates a transaction alert for unsafe shopping.

FIG. 17 illustrates a transaction alert indicating a source of possiblepersonal information misuse.

FIG. 18 illustrates an e-commerce system with interactions that may bemonitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 19 illustrates an e-commerce system with interactions that may bemonitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 20 illustrates an e-commerce transaction with a computing servicewherein the transaction may be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 21A illustrates validation, authorization, and a selection ofservice within an e-commerce setting wherein the transactions may bemonitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 21B illustrates a validation and selection process wherein thetransactions may be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 22 illustrates a central processing facility access process whereinthe transactions may be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 23 illustrates an authentication and validation process wherein thetransactions may be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 24 illustrates a service selection process wherein the transactionsmay be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 25 illustrates a confirmation process wherein the transactions maybe monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 26 illustrates a database connection process wherein thetransactions may be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 27 illustrates a revocation of validation and authorization processwherein the transactions may be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 28 illustrates a purchasing process wherein the transactions may bemonitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 29 illustrates an advertising aggregation process wherein thetransactions may be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 30 illustrates a process including payments wherein thetransactions may be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 31 illustrates a bidding process wherein the transactions may bemonitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 32 illustrates a classified ad/coupon process wherein thetransactions may be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 33 illustrates an advertisement integration process wherein thetransactions may be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 34 illustrates an advertisement selection process wherein thetransactions may be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 35 illustrates a recommendation process wherein the transactionsmay be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 36 illustrates a metadata manipulation process wherein thetransactions may be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 37 illustrates a price manipulation process wherein thetransactions may be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 38 illustrates a data transmission process wherein the transactionsmay be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 39 illustrates a function selection process wherein thetransactions may be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 40 illustrates a Web interaction process wherein the transactionsmay be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 41 illustrates a privacy policy process wherein the transactionsmay be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 42 illustrates a schema determination process wherein thetransactions may be monitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 43 illustrates a payment process wherein the transactions may bemonitored by a reputation service.

FIG. 44 illustrates an affiliation process wherein the transactions maybe monitored by a reputation service.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

An aspect of the present invention relates to improving computer anduser security and protection through reputation services. Informationrelating to Websites may be used before, during, or after certainWebsite interactions as a way of predicting the reliability, safety,security, nuisance value, or other parameters of the interactions. Inembodiments, systems and methods disclosed herein relate to assessingthe reputation of a site, page, or portion thereof, and alerting a userof the reputation prior to or simultaneously with an interaction withthe site, page, or portion. For example, a particular site, or contentfrom the site, may carry unwanted or unintended content as a generalpractice or in certain instances. A system according to the principlesof the present invention may alert the user of such reputation prior toa user interaction with the site or content. In other situations,Websites request information from users for a purchase, to log in, togain information, as part of a survey, or the like, and a systemaccording to the principles of the present invention may alert the userabout the site's reputation for using such information before the userprovides such information through the site. There are many safetyprecautions, parental control features, protection systems, and the likethat may be implemented through a reputation-based interactive systemaccording to the principles of the present invention.

FIG. 1 illustrates a high level schematic of an interactivereputation-based platform 100 according to the principles of the presentinvention. The interactive reputation platform 100 may include a numberof client devices 102 that interact with server applications 104 throughthe Internet 108 or other internetworking facility. The clients 102 mayinclude computers (e.g. desktops, laptops, palmtops) 102A, televisionsor other audio visual equipment 102B, mobile communication facilities(e.g. cell phones, PDAs, email devices, IM devices, pagers, messagingdevices) 102C, set top boxes, gaming consoles, networked consumerelectronics device, or any other facility capable of interacting a site,link, or similar networked computing facility. The clients 102 may alsointeract with a reputation server 110 for various reasons. For example,the clients 102 may download client software, software updates, browserplug-ins, and the like from the reputation server 110. In embodiments,the clients may interact with servers 104 through or in coordinationwith the reputation server 110.

The interactive reputation platform 100 may also include a reputationservice host 112. The reputation service host 112 may be associated withthe reputation server 110 and or a client 102 and or be associated, infull or in part, with both the reputation server 110 and the client 102.In embodiments, a portion of the reputation service host 112 may resideon the client 102, and a portion may reside on the reputation server110. In embodiments the reputation service host 112 may perform severalfunctions related to reputation-based protection of clients 102. Forexample, the reputation service host may perform services associatedwith gathering, storing, and or providing reputation informationrelating to certain Websites, activities, categories, types ofinteractions, content types, and the like 114. The reputation servicehost 112 may provide warnings, cautions, alerts, indications ofacceptable reputation, indications of poor reputations, indications ofreputations, indications of types of expected behaviors, and the like118. The reputation service host 112 may analyze behaviors (e.g. userbehavior, site behavior, corporate behavior, page behavior, advertisingbehavior, communications behavior, or other behavior) 122 associatedwith the reputation information 114. The reputation service host 112 maymonitor performance (e.g. client system performance before and or aftera Web interaction) 124. In embodiments, the reputation service host 112may include a recommendation facility (e.g. making recommendations to auser of the client based on a site reputation the user is attempting tointeract with) 130.

The reputation service host 112 may be embodied in hardware, software,firmware, middleware, or a combination of any of the foregoing. Inembodiments, the reputation service host 112 may comprise a server, suchas an HTTP server, Web server, or the like; as well as one or more othercomputing facilities, such as a processor, operating system, database,or communications facility; and one or more modules, such as modules forprocessing or executing algorithms or services. In embodiments, thereputation service host 112 may comprise a single computer. In otherembodiments, the reputation service host 112 may comprise more than onecomputer, such as in a distributed or parallel-processing system. Inembodiments, the reputation service host 112 may comprise a cluster ofservices, such as those that are registered in the registry of aservices oriented architecture.

In embodiments a client 102, for example, may attempt to interact withan application associated with a server 104. The reputation service host112 may have previously collected reputation information relating to theapplication, and the reputation service host 112 may alert the user ofthe client to the reputation before connecting the client 102 to theapplication. The reputation service host may, for example, monitor anaddress or URL entered into an address bar of a browser applicationassociated with the client 102, and, after the user has entered theaddress, the reputation service host 112 may provide an alert to theuser that the Website that the user is about to interact with has areputation for downloading spyware, malware, or other unwanted content.By way of another example, the client may be interacting with a site,and the site may present a page requesting information, such as a useremail address, credit card information, and the like. The reputationservice host 112, having previously collected information relating tohow this provider treats such information, may provide the user with awarning of how the provider treats such information prior to submittingany such information. The client may be presented with a warning whenpresented with the opportunity to enter such information, or the usermay be provided a warning after entering the information but before theinformation is sent to the provider, for example.

In embodiments, when indicia of a reputation are presented, they may bepresented along with evidence of the reputation at the time the user ismaking the interaction. For example, the presentation may includeinformation relating to the number of pop-ups, type of virus, type ofmalware, type of spyware, type of identity theft, frequency of identitytheft, site category (e.g. adult, travel, loan, children, teen, orretirement), and the like associated with the interaction. Inembodiments, the evidence may have been produced through testing ordeveloped through secondary sources, for example. In embodiments, thereputation information may be provided through visual indications, auralindications, multi-media indications, video indications, or otherwise.

An internetwork of computing facilities 108 may involve any number ofdifferent networking systems. For example, the internetwork 108 mayinvolve client-server topologies involving wired, wireless, optical,satellite, or other connection types. The internetwork 108 may involveP2P, mobile client-cell phone network-server, mobile client-satellitenetwork-server, mobile client-server relationships or types ofrelationships. For example, a mobile communication facility 102C mayconnect to the Internet 108 through a wireless service provider 132(e.g. Sprint, Verizon, AT&T, or T-Mobile).

In embodiments, a client 102 may be a desktop computer, laptop computer,palmtop computer, phone, cell phone, satellite phone, personal digitalassistant (PDA), combination PDA/phone, walkie-talkie, television, videoappliance, audio appliance, radio, satellite radio, picture appliance,Web appliance, home appliance (e.g. as part of home automation),information appliance, mobile communication platform, in-vehiclecommunication facility, location facility, GPS facility, wirelessdevice, wired device, optical device, or other such device. Inembodiments, a reputation service host 112 may recognize the type ofclient 102 and customize the interaction based on the type of client102.

In embodiments, a reputation server 110 may be duplicated anddistributed throughout a region to provide faster access by clients inthe region. In embodiments, the reputation server 110 may provideservices, content, applications, updates, and the like to clients 102.In embodiments, the reputation server 110 may be used by a client 102 inthe interaction process with other servers 104.

In embodiments, a reputation service host 112 may be adapted to collect,store, organize, and/or provide reputation information 118 relating toWebsites and the like. Examples of such information may include a widerange of indicia, which in turn may relate to the quality of content ofa site, page, or portion thereof; to behavior or other actions engagedin by a site or the host thereof; to attributes of the site or the host;or other attributes of the site. Such information 118 may includeinformation relating to spam, adware, spyware, cookies, viruses,phishing, spoofing, worms, illegal activities, immoral activities,illicit activities, improper business practices, age inappropriatematerial, gambling, location of provider, corporate information, postoffice box, false phone number, misleading phone number, phone numberlocation, duration of registration, location of registration, betterbusiness bureau information, Website reference information, Websitequality listing, VeriSign listing, analysis of links to the site,analysis of links from the site, treatment of information, treatment ofpersonal information, names, addresses, phone numbers, social securitynumbers, portion of social security number, credit card number, banknumber, pin, mother's maiden name, spouse's name, license number,immigration information, purchase information, username, password,password for the site, mortgage amount, car loan amounts, loaninformation, loan application information, income, downloading ofcontent, downloading of unwanted content, downloading of spyware,downloading of malware, downloading of viruses, downloading of worms,downloading of programs, downloading of executable files, downloading ofActiveX, downloading of unexpected content, downloading of Java,downloading of JavaScript, downloading of VBscript, downloading ofFlash, downloading of a media player, downloading of a player,downloading of a Webpage containing Web browser “exploits,”misdirection, misleading information, trademarks, trade dress, servicemarks, trade names, brand name confusion, false information, metadatapatterns, corporate addresses, how long the company has been inexistence, how long the Website has been in existence, whether a companyhas an IP address in a range of addresses with a poor reputation,existence of a trademark, whether a company is a spammer, popularityranks, ranking of the corporation (such as based on existence withinFortune 1000, Fortune 500, Fortune 100, Fortune 50, and Fortune 10),false corporate ownership information, misleading call information (e.g.whom or what a call will reach), higher ranked similar sites, famoustrademarks, whether the site owns a registered trademark (e.g. federal,local, or international), whether the site has certificates, whether thesite is similar to one with a famous trademark, decoy sites, validaddresses (e.g. corporate and or site reference), valid phone numbers(e.g. corporate and or site reference), valid email addresses (e.g.corporate and or site reference), valid contact information, addressesthat correspond with a phone number and or the phone number presented,how long the site has existed, where the site is hosted, what IP rangesthe site IP address is in, whether the site asks for personalinformation, whether it requests personal information, where on the sitea site asks for personal information, whether the site sends emailrelated to the content on the Website (e.g. it may be acceptable for anadult site to send adult content emails, but it may not be acceptablefor a lottery Website to send adult content emails), whether the siteadheres to common security practices (e.g. uses SSL, etc) or the like.Each one of these factors, or any combination of any two or more ofthem, may be used as a basis for assessing the reputation of a site, apage, or a portion thereof, such as in association with a user'sinteraction with the same. While certain preferred embodiments have beenidentified, the information 118 may encompass any type of informationthat can be used to derive an indicator of reputation or to serve assuch an indicator, including any type of information referenced hereinor in the documents incorporated by reference herein.

In embodiments, one or more items or attributes of reputationinformation 118 may be used to judge or establish an overall reputationof a site or to judge or establish a specific reputation parameter Oncea reputation parameter is established, it can be used in various ways;for example, a site that has a reputation for misusing privateinformation may be tagged as a high risk site, and information aboutthat risk may be presented to a user, such as at a time when a user ispresented with an opportunity to enter such information. As anotherexample, the user may be presented with an opportunity to downloadcertain content from a Website with a poor reputation, and thereputation service host 112 may use the reputation information 118 toprovide a warning to the user prior to downloading the content.

In embodiments, a reputation test may be performed or a reputationalgorithm executed to assess or evaluate the reputation of a site,interactions with a site, or other such parameters. A test or algorithmmay involve a collection phase 116, in which reputation information 118is collected by various techniques, such as testing downloads, in orderto determine whether and how they modify the test computer's file systemand registry, whether they display pop up ads, whether they talk toknown ad-servers on a network, whether they talk to other servers on anetwork known to be used by known adware/spyware programs, how theyrelate to the contents of the EULA agreement presented in the setupprogram, whether the program modifies the browser settings (such ashomepage, search engine, list of trusted sites, SSL certificationauthorities, proxies) or adds toolbars, sidebars, or buttons to thebrowser or to the desktop, whether the program installs knownadware/spyware COM objects, ClassIDs, browser helper objects, whetherthe program installs cookies, or the like. The collection phase 116 maybe undertaken by a variety of other techniques or facilities forcollecting information 118, such as by reading or parsing information ona site, aggregating content from multiple sites, spidering a network toidentify sites with particular content or information, asking users toreport on the information or activities of a site, conducting research,such as using databases or research tools that have information about asite or a host (such as databases of company or entity information,databases of litigation information, databases of consumer complaints,or the like), asking users to rate interactions with a site, interactingwith the site and monitoring the results, registering with a site andmonitoring the results (including, for example, receiving traditionalmail subsequent to interacting with a site), executing a transaction ona site and monitoring the results, or a wide range of other informationcollection techniques. In embodiments information that is collected inthe collection phase 116 may be stored in a database, which may beoptimized to store reputation information 118, such as for retrieval,analysis and use, in order to alert users at appropriate times. Inembodiments, certain types of reputation information 118 may beassociated with others in combinations or sub-combinations in order toallow rapid retrieval or analysis of combined categories of information.For example, indicators of spam, adware, and cookies may be associatedwith each other, and the presence of all three for a site may serve assecondary or “meta-indicator” of aggressive advertising behavior. Inembodiments, reputation information 118 may be stored in a hierarchicalfashion, such as including categories and sub-categories of informationin a hierarchy or tree structure.

A reputation service host 112 may initiate a number of actions, alerts,cautions, warnings and the like during a client's 102 interaction with aserver, other client 102, or other facility. For example, the reputationservice host 112 may initiate warnings or alerts 114, provide reputationinformation 118, provide recommendations 130, and the like based onreputation information 118 accessible to the reputation service host112. For example, actions may involve alerts, warnings, prevention ofaccess, or the like based on reputation and or behaviors. The reputationservice host 112 may indicate various levels of warnings, indications,and alerts from cautionary statements to warnings and indications ofdanger. In embodiments, the level of warning may increase with increasedparticipation, as, for example, when a user interacts with aparticularly non-reputable site.

The warning, alert 114, or other indication of reputation may be basedon one or more parameters (e.g. one or more indicia of reputationcollected and stored as reputation information 118).

In embodiments, information may be provided indicating action orinteraction is acceptable. For example, when presented with aninformation request on a site, the reputation service host 112 mayprovide an indication to the user that this site has an acceptablereputation for dealing with such information.

In embodiments, warnings 114 may be provided with further informationavailable. Warnings may be accompanied with available alternatives. Awarning may relate to a prospective download. A warning may be apersonal information warning, adware warning, spyware warning, malwarewarning, content warning, unwanted included file warning, cookiewarning, data warning, unintended Website warning (e.g. misdirectedthrough a similar mark), shopping warning, e-commerce warning, misuse ofpersonal information warning, or the like. A warning 114 may include,for example, any type of information 118 described herein or a summaryor indicator of the same.

In embodiments, the reputation service host 112 may provide a preventionservice in such a way that an interaction or further interaction is notallowed or only allowed to proceed with an acknowledgement of the risk.In embodiments, such acknowledgements may be recorded for laterretrieval (e.g. in a parental control setting, a parent may want to viewthe overrides).

A reputation service host 112 may include an analysis service 122. Theanalysis service 122 may be a behavior analysis service, such as, forexample, a manual or automated system for assessing the reputation of aWebsite based on reputation information 118. In embodiments the analysisservice 122 may be an automated or semi-automated system. For example,an algorithm may be adapted to measure the duration of a Website'sexistence and compare it against a predetermined period. If the site hasbeen in existence for a longer period than the predetermined period, thesite may be deemed to have an acceptable reputation, or a parameterassociated with the duration may be given a favorable value. Theanalysis service 122 may also be adapted to analyze more than oneparameter (e.g. indicia of reputation from the reputation information118). In embodiments the analysis service 122 may include one or moreparameterized algorithms for determining an overall reputation of asite, a page, or a portion thereof. For example, a host of a reputationservice 112 may include any one or more of the items of reputationinformation 118 described above as parameters in an equation fordetermining reputation. An equation may, for example, calculate areputation score based on values of individual elements of reputation112. The individual information elements 118 may include discrete“on/off” values or may be determined on a continuum or scale. Inembodiments, such an algorithm may be generated iteratively, such as bycomparing results of actual interactions with Web sites with resultsthat are predicted based on reputation information. Thus, embodimentsinclude methods and systems for optimizing a reputation algorithm bycomparing calculated reputation values with actual events and adjustingweights in the reputation algorithm to improve the fit between thecalculated values and the actual events.

In embodiments the analysis services 122 may include one or morealgorithms for determining a parameter of reputation, such as to presenta multi-dimensional or multi-faceted view of a reputation. For example,an algorithm may include weighted values for various parameters that arein turn used to present different categories of reputation. For example,one dimension of reputation may relate to the inclusion of adultcontent, which may be distinct from another dimension related to sendingunwanted email, which in turn may be distinct from a dimension relatedto unwanted downloads.

A reputation service host 112 may include a recommendation facility 130.The recommendation facility 130 may be adapted to provide a user with arecommendation associated with an interaction the user is having orabout to have with a site, page, or portion thereof or to providealternate recommendations when the user is attempting to interact with asite with a poor reputation. The alternate recommendations may, forexample, relate to high reputation Websites that provide similar contentor services to the site with which the user originally attempted tointeract. For example, a user may attempt to interact with apoor-reputation Website, and the reputation service host facility 112may provide a list of recommended Websites offering similar products orservices. In embodiments, a recommendation facility may providealternative sites, alternative brick and mortar stores, alternativephone numbers, alternative addresses, alternative email addresses,alternative purchase transaction facilities (e.g. a temporary creditcard to be used during a particular transaction so as not to expose onesown credit card to the transaction), and other such alternatives.

A reputation service host 112 may also operate in coordination withanother protection program, such as a virus protection program 134, aspam filter 138, a content filter, a parental control program, a spywareremoval program 140, and/or a firewall 142, or any combination thereof.While the virus protection program 134, spam filter 138, spyware removalprogram 140, and firewall 142 are illustrated as being alternativelyassociated with the reputation service host 112, it should be understoodthat such facilities may be associated with remote devices and orservers.

A reputation service host 112 may identify an interaction between aclient 102 and a site, page, program, content item, or other item, suchas a Web site that is operated through a server 104. If the site, forexample, has a reputation of downloading viruses or other malware, thereputation service host 112 may operate in coordination with the virusprotection program 134 to target any such undesired content that mayhave been downloaded to the client 102. Alternatively, or in addition,the virus program 134 may be used during any such site interactions toidentify and protect the client. In embodiments, the reputation servicehost 112 may identify the potentially harmful content and or behaviorand communicate with the virus program 134. The information may relateto the content and or the behavior. Once the information has beenprovided to the virus program 134, the virus program may search theclient's 102 drives for all viruses or other malware, or it may targetspecific content identified by the reputation service host 112. Inembodiments, the virus program may operate in a targeted fashion duringany interaction with the site.

In embodiments, the antivirus software is adapted to scan hard drivesfor malware and the like. In embodiments, the antivirus software may beperiodically updated. In embodiments, the antivirus software may beadapted to scan email. In embodiments, the antivirus software may beadapted to check downloads before they are installed, as they are beinginstalled, or after they are installed.

The reputation service host 112 may be associated with a spam protectionfacility (e.g. spam filter software residing on the client 102 or spamfilter software residing on an associated server). The reputationservice host 112 may detect a client 102 server 104 interactionindicative of a spam attack, so the reputation service host 112 may sendan indication of such to the spam protection facility 138. The spamprotection facility 138 may then target spam from the interacted sourceor generally increase an activity associated with spam reviews. Forexample, any email identified as coming from the interacted source maybe loaded into a folder for review and the user may be alerted to thefact that the email has been tagged as spam.

In embodiments, the spam protection facility may filter spam, preventaddress harvesting by keeping users from entering information on aWebsite, identify spam, report spam, provide content based filtering(e.g. looking for email that contains links to low reputation Websitesas an indicator that this is unwanted email), provide statisticalfiltering, provide check-sum filtering, provide authentication, provideor verify keys, perform Heuristic filtering, set honey pots, or performother such activities.

The reputation service host 112 may be associated with a spywareprotection facility (e.g. spyware software resident on the client'sserver 102). For example, the reputation service host 112 may detectthat the client has interacted with or is about to interact with a sitethat has a reputation for downloading spyware, and the reputationservice host 112 may inform the spyware protection facility 140 of such.The spyware facility may then analyze the client (e.g. search any drivesassociated with the client) for spyware, and the spyware facility maytarget the types of spyware programs the interacted source has areputation for downloading, or the spyware facility may search foldersand the like the interacted source generally targets for storage. Inembodiments, the spyware protection facility may be anti-spyware, aspyware filter, IE favorites addition notification, or spywareidentification technology, and it may search hard drives, reportspyware, and the like.

The reputation service host 112 may be associated with a firewallfacility 142 (e.g. hardware of software firewalls). For example, thereputation service host 112 may identify high risk content, sites, andthe like, and it may pass this information on to a firewall facility142. The firewall facility 142 may then use this information to blockall such suspect content and contact.

In embodiments, the firewall facility may invoke security policies, suchas using a database of known acceptable programs that should be allowedto use the network and non-acceptable programs that should not beallowed to use the network. The firewall facility may further be adaptedto protect personal information by keeping the user from enteringcertain Websites in addition to blocking personal information from beingtransmitted from the client by checking packets as they're sent from theclient. The firewall facility may further be adapted to protect againstunauthorized uses or unauthorized users.

In embodiments, the several protection facilities, the reputationservice host 112, virus protection program 134, a spam filter 138, aspyware program 140, and or a firewall 142 may operate in a coordinatedfashion. The coordination may involve one or more of the protectionfacilities, for example. For example, the reputation service host 112may detect a client interaction with a poor reputation site, and one ormore of the other protection facilities (e.g. virus protection program134, a spam filter 138, a spyware program 140 and or a firewall 142) maybe employed to provide its protection service.

In embodiments, a reputation service host 112 may be associated with aWeb filtering facility adapted to identify content, prevent content,notify of content, or perform other like activities. In embodiments, areputation service host 112 may be associated with a phishing facilityadapted to filter phishing, identify phishing activities, identifylegitimate sites (e.g. using a white list of known good sites), orprovide other like services.

In embodiments, a reputation service host 112 may be associated with asecurity or controlled access facility (not shown). For example, thesecurity or controlled access facility may be a fingerprint reader,biometric facility, retinal scanner, face recognition facility, voiceprint recognition facility, DNA recognition facility, blood typerecognition facility, blood characteristics recognition facility,digital signature recognition facility, or other such facility.

In embodiments, a reputation service host 112 may be associated with amonitoring device (not shown), such as a camera, microphone, sensor, orthe like. In embodiments, a reputation service host 112 may beassociated with other software such as cryptography software. Inembodiments, the reputation service host 112 may be associated with aparental controls facility. For example, the settings for allowinginteractions with Web content may be adjusted in accordance withparental control settings. In embodiments, the reputation service host112 may be associated with a supervisor or administrator controlsfacility. For example, the settings for allowing interactions with Webcontent may be adjusted in accordance with supervisor or administratorcontrol settings. For example, publicly accessible computers, such as ina library, may be regulated in accordance with supervisor rules toprevent the contamination of the computers.

Another aspect of the present invention relates to the timing of thepresentation of warnings and other such reputation-based actions. Inembodiments, the warnings, recommendations, and indicia of reputationand the like are provided at the time of the attempted interaction orwhen the opportunity for an interaction is presented. For example, whena user enters a URL in an address bar of a browser, the user may bepresented with reputation-based services even before the user's clientdevice 102 is connected to the intended site. This may happen by aprocess involving various steps, including allowing the user to enterthe URL, having the reputation service host 112 identify the URL, andcomparing the URL to known URLs with associated reputation information,and then either providing information relating to the URL or allowingthe browser to continue the action of connecting to the site.

In other embodiments, the user may be presented with a site thatincludes the opportunity for a user to enter information, such asqueries, personal information, email address information, credit cardinformation, passwords, or the like, and the reputation service host 112may alert the user with indicia of the site's reputation as the site ispresented. This may be done through a site comparison with reputationinformation 118 and/or through a review of what is being asked for onthe page. When information requests are found, the page, content, site,or affiliated company may be assessed for reputation, and an indicatorof the reputation may be presented to the user, or other reputationservices may be provided. In embodiments, the user may enter informationinto entry fields on a page, and the action of entering the informationmay initiate a reputation review of the page, site, content, corporateaffiliations, or the like.

FIG. 2 illustrates processes and progressions of processes with which areputation service may be employed 200. Three processes are illustratedin FIG. 2: entering an address in a browser facility 202; entering asearch query in a search facility 204; and providing information througha Web page or the like 208.

The process of entering an address into a browser facility or the like202 may involve steps of entering the URL, finding the site 210,entering the site 212, and then entering related sites 214 (e.g. linkedsites, pages within the site). A reputation service host 112 may provideinformation, prevent access or otherwise interact with this process atany one of these stages. For example, after the URL is entered, the URLinformation may be provided to a reputation service host 112 foranalysis, and the reputation service host 112 may provide interactionbefore the site is searched for. Likewise, the reputation service host112 may interact with the process while the site is being located,engaged, and or entered. Even after the site has been entered, thereputation service host 112 may provide information or other reputationservices. For example, the user may have entered a site that is notdesirable from a reputation standpoint, and the reputation service hostmay indicate such to the user once he has entered the site. The user maythen be presented with alternatives, including initiating a virus scan,spyware scan, or the like.

In embodiments, the timing of the warnings, prevention, and or otherreputation services may be coordinated with typing in the navigation bar(including the typing of certain words or parts of words), hitting“return” in the navigation bar, or other interaction with a site, suchas when certain items or objects are presented, when clicking onhyperlink, when mousing over a hyperlink or other item, when informationis requested or presented, when certain dialog boxes are presented, whenentering information into a Website, or the like.

The process of searching the Internet, or other internetwork ofcomputing devices 204, may involve entering a search query into a searchengine and receiving results, recommendations, sponsored links, or thelike. Following the presentation of such information, the user may electto enter a site by clicking on a link or the like. A reputation serviceprovided through a reputation service host 112 may be provided before,during, or following each of these interactions. For example, once auser enters a search query, a reputation service may be employed tomodify or enhance the search query. For example, the reputation servicehost 112 may augment the query with information adapted to search forsites and content with high reputation information, such as VeriSignregistered sites only. Once the query is run, results 218 may beobtained. A reputation service may be provided once results 218 areobtained by marking results with warnings, high reputation marks, andthe like.

During the search process 204, recommended sites and or content 220 maybe provided along with search results 218. A reputation service may beemployed in the process of retrieving the recommendations. For example,the recommendations may be highly rated recommendations and or therecommendations may be marked for presentation to indicate thereputation of the recommendation. Similarly, sponsored links, content,and the like may be retrieved and or marked in accordance with areputation service host 112.

During the process of providing information 208 (e.g. providing personalinformation, credit card information, email address, IM name, and thelike) a reputation service may be employed through a reputation servicehost 112. For example, when an information request entry field ispresented, a reputation service host 112 may detect such and provide ananalysis of the reputation of the particular entry field or affiliatedsite. The reputation service host 112 may then provide the user withindicia of the sites reputation. An indication of the reputation, orother reputation services, may be provided after information has beenentered in the entry field. The reputation service host 112 may interactwith the user after the field has been entered but before anyinformation is transmitted, and or the host 112 may provide a servicefollowing the transmission of the information to the site.

A client may interact with a reputation service host 112 in a number ofways, and all such ways are encompassed by the present invention. Inembodiments, the reputation service host 112 may be employed as a clientprogram or a browser plug-in, for example.

While FIG. 2 shows certain embodiments of processes in which usersinteract with sites, it should be understood that the reputationservices described herein may be associated with the steps or sub-stepsof hosts of other processes in which users interact with sites, content,applications, portions of sites, pages, or other items. For example, areputation service may be associated with one or more of the steps of anelectronic commerce interaction, an electronic auction interaction, aword processing interaction, a downloading interaction, a purchase, asale, an offer, a publishing action, a syndication action, anaggregation action, a shopping interaction, reverse auction interaction,an advertising interaction, or other interaction.

In embodiments, a reputation service host 112 may provide information,prevent access, or otherwise interact during an attempted Webinteraction. For example, the reputation service host may interact witha search, search engine search results, opening of Website, use ofWebsite, viewing banner advertisement, interacting with banneradvertisement, or at another point in the process. As another example,the reputation service host may interact during a mobile communicationfacility (e.g. a cell phone or PDA) interaction while accessing a site,viewing a menu bar, making a phone call, or at another point in theprocess of interacting with the Web through a mobile communicationfacility. As another example, the reputation service host may interactduring an email interaction such as when viewing items in the mailbox,before allowing to load, before opening, before reading, before viewingattachments, or at another point in the process of interacting withemail. As another example, the reputation service host may interactduring an instant message (IM) interaction such as when opening an IMprogram, initiating chat, receiving a message, viewing an advertisement,receiving a chat, or at another point in the process of interactingthrough IM. As another example, the reputation service host may interactduring an interaction with the Web during activities in other softwareapplications such as a word processor (e.g. Word, etc.), presentationsoftware (e.g. PowerPoint, etc.), collaboration software (e.g. Lotusnotes, etc.), spreadsheet software, business process managementsoftware, database software (e.g. PeopleSoft, SAP, Oracle, Sybase, IBM,open source), human resources software, supply chain/ordering/inventorysoftware, purchasing software, or other software applications.

Referring to FIG. 3, the user may interact from a client 102 to areputation server 110 for the initial download of the client or browserplug-in program, or the user may obtain the client program through CD,DVD, or like means. Once the client has loaded the client software host112, the client may interact with the reputation server 110 for updatesin the software or definitions used in the process of providingreputation services. The updates may be periodic, predetermined,received upon actions, on-demand, or at some other period. Once theclient is operational with the reputation service host client program,the client may interact with devices and servers 104 through theInternet or other internetwork of devices. The reputation service shotprogram may monitor client iriteractions with the Internet and provideservices as described herein.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 3, the client 102 may also or insteadinteract with servers 104 and other devices through a reputation server110. For example, the client 102 may make a request through the Internet(e.g. a search query intended for a search portal, or a URL connectionrequest), and the request may be made through or in coordination withthe reputation server 110. The reputation server may be running theassociated reputation service host 112, and the interactions with thehost 112 may be enacted through the reputation server 110.

FIG. 4 illustrates a reputation information process 400 involvingInternet requests. In the reputation information process 400 a user mayprovide an Internet request 402 (e.g. a search request or URL addressrequest), and a reputation analysis 404 may be performed in conjunctionwith the request. For example, the address request may be analyzed usinginformation relating to sites, content, and the like to identify thereputation of the site, content, and the like. The reputation may be areputation for a specific activity or an overall reputation, forexample. If a search term or phrase is provided at the internet requeststage 402, a reputation analysis 404 may be performed on the resultsproduced, for example. Following the reputation analysis 404, a decisionmay be made to either provide the requested information (e.g. the siteor search results) 408 and or to provide an alert, caution, warning,recommendation, or other reputation service as described herein 410. Forexample, the reputation analysis may result in an acceptable reputationevaluation, and the user may be provided with the requested information408. In the example relating to the requested site, this may mean thesite is entered. In the example relating to the search results, this maymean the search results are presented. Instead of being presented withthe requested information, the user may be presented with an alert orother reputation service 410, such as a caution pop-up. The user may bepresented with the requested information 408 and be presented with analert or other reputation service 410. For example, the search resultsmay be presented along with an indication of the reputation of each suchresult. There may be a reputation indicator associated with each result,or there may be a reputation indicator presented for certain types ofresults (e.g. results associated with good or poor reputations). Afterthe user has been presented with an alert or other reputation service410, the user may be presented with an option to receive the requestedinformation 412, or the user may be restricted from receiving theinformation 414. A parental control feature may be used in such aprocess where certain poor reputation sites are restricted from beingviewed at the restrict access stage 414.

FIG. 5 illustrates a reputation information process 400 involvinginformation requests. In the reputation information process 400, a usermay be asked to provide information 502 (e.g. personal information,email address, credit card information), and a reputation analysis 404may be performed in conjunction with the request. For example, theinformation request may be analyzed using information relating to sites,content, and the like to identify the reputation of the site requestingthe information, content, and the like. The reputation may be areputation for a specific activity or an overall reputation, forexample. Following the reputation analysis 404 a decision may be made toeither provide the requested information 508 and or to provide to theuser an alert, caution, warning, recommendation, or other reputationservice as described herein 410. For example, the reputation analysismay result in an acceptable reputation evaluation, and the user may beprovided with the requested information 408 without further prompts orinformation. Or, the user may be presented with an alert, reputationinformation, or other reputation service as described herein 410. Forexample, a balloon style alert may appear next to the request forinformation. Once such an alert or other reputation service informationis presented 410, the user may be restricted from supplying information414, or the system (e.g. the reputation service host 112) may allow theinformation to be provided 512.

Referring back to FIG. 1, in embodiments, there may be a Web browserapplication and a proxy application running on the client 102 (e.g. apersonal computer 102A). The architecture system may be an extension toa Web browser such as Internet Explorer, or it may be built as a proxyrunning on the personal computer, for example. The proxy application maybe in communication with the Web reputation service server 110 via adatabase query interface (e.g. a real time database query interface) toaccomplish the tasks of the reputation service host 112. This interfacemay include XML queries, RSS polls, HTML polls, SQL queries, a secureconnection, an insecure connection, a publish-subscribe mechanism inwhich query results are pushed to the client 102, or any otherpracticable interface. The Web browser may be configured to utilize theproxy application such as a Web proxy. A user of the client 102 mayattempt to access a URL using the Web browser. This access attempt maybe passed to the proxy application. The proxy application may determinethe reputation of the Web content at the URL by utilizing the real timedatabase query interface to query the reputation of the Web content atthe URL via the communication with the Web reputation service server110. In embodiments, there may also be a local cache on the clientdevice 102 such that the frequently/recently accessed content has itsreputation, or indicia of its reputation, stored locally. Thisinformation may be cleared out of the cache, or modified, when newthreat information is associated with stored information or there is achange in the reputation status of a site, or for other such reasons.

While many embodiments of the present invention refer to a URL, itshould be understood that certain embodiments also involve not just thetop level URL (e.g. the one seen in the browser navigation bar), but thesystems may also look up URLs of content that are included in a page(e.g. such as when there are frames, when JavaScript is included byreference from a separate file on the server, etc). The systems mayfurther be adapted to look up hash codes of some objects (e.g. programs,ActiveX controls, Flash files, etc.) since the actual content of thelink may change even though the URL stays the same.

Continuing to refer to FIG. 1, the server 110 may be able to accessreputation information 118 of Web content associated with a URL byquerying a database containing such information. This information mayhave been stored previously in the database by the server 110. Theinformation may have been created by a Web content analysis facility 122that may be integral to the server 110, such as executable application.Optionally, the Web content analysis facility 122 may be external to theserver 110, such as an executable application running on another serveror on the client 102. In any case, the Web content analysis facility 122may access Web contention the third-party Web server 104 and maycomprise a computer program that may perform a Web content analysisfunction such as, without limitation, a link structure analysis; a whitelist comparison; a black list comparison; a heuristic; an automatictest; a dynamic analysis of an executable application or script; astatic analysis of an executable application or script; an analysis ofan end user license agreement; a business analysis resulting in adetermination of a distinguishing characteristic of a Web site, such asa business model or a genre; a Web crawl; or a machine learningoperation. From time to time, the information may be updated. Based uponthe reputation of the Web content associated with the URL, the proxyapplication may, without limitation, allow; deny; allow-in-part;deny-in-part; modify; or alter the Web content. Moreover, based upon thereputation of the Web content associated with the URL, the proxyapplication may, without limitation, alert the user; interrogate theuser; suggest alternate Web content to the user; or provide to the usera URL for the alternate Web content.

Still referring to FIG. 1, in another embodiment of the invention, theremay not be a proxy application on the client 102. Instead, the Webbrowser may be configured to use a proxy application located at the Webreputation service server 110. The operation of this embodiment of theinvention may be substantially similar to the other embodimentsdescribed above. In embodiments, the proxy could also be on the localnetwork of the client or on the ISP's network, for example.

Still referring to FIG. 1, in yet another embodiment of the invention,there may be no proxy application at all. Instead, the Web browser maybe used to access a search engine that is associated with the Webreputation service server 110. This search engine may return searchresults that are augmented or affected by the information associatedwith the reputation of the URLs appearing in the results. The searchengine may utilize the real time database query interface in asubstantially similar fashion to that of the proxy application in theabove embodiments.

A Web reputation service may involve a real-time database queryinterface for looking up the reputation of Web sites, programs, Webforms, and other such content. Sites may be classified, for example ascategories such as of “OK”, “Adware Distributor”, “Risky E-Commerce”,and so forth.

In embodiments, the reputation of Web content may be determined with alink structure analysis. For example, a link structure analysis may beperformed using an assumption that trustworthy Web sites tend to beaffiliated with other trustworthy Web sites, and that conversely,untrustworthy Web sites tend to be affiliated with other untrustworthyWeb sites. An affiliation of Web sites is often realized throughhyperlinks from one Web site to another. When the hyperlinks ofaffiliated sites are viewed in aggregate, this may be considered acluster. The link structure analysis may begin with a seed set of sitesthat have a priori reputation information. A fraction of that reputation(whether positive or negative) may be propagated to each neighboring Website, that is each Web site that is one hyperlink away from the seedset. This may have the effect of adding the neighboring Web sites to theseed set, creating a new set. The procedure of propagating reputationand creating a new set may be repeated with each new set being used asthe ‘seed set’. In embodiments, this may continue a fixed number oftimes or until certain error thresholds are within tolerance of certaintest sites.

For example, consider three sites A, B, and C. In a certain situationthe reputation service host 112 may have information (e.g. reputationinformation 118) relating to sites A and B; however, it may not containany information about site C. The information may have been gained, forexample, through crawling and analyzing sites A and B, but for whateverreason site C did not get analyzed (e.g. site C was created after thelast time sites were crawled and analyzed). Further, let's assume thatsites A and B both contain content that has links to site C. Inembodiments, the analysis facility 122 may infer the reputation of siteC from the reputation of A and B. Sites A and B would both be ‘seed’sites with known or assessed reputations. An algorithm associated withthe analysis facility 122, for example, would then associate somefraction of A's and B's reputations to site C. So, if site A has 10units of ‘badness’ and site B has 20 units of ‘badness’ the system mightsuggest that site C has ½*10+½*20=15 units of badness propagated to siteC.

While the above example uses a three site example, it should beunderstood this example is provided to illustrate the concept only andthe concept may be applied to a much larger or a smaller number ofsites, and that algorithms of varying complexity and/or other evaluationtechniques may be used. In embodiments, the analysis is performed basedon the theory that good sites tend to mostly point to other good siteswhile bad sites tend to point to both bad sites (e.g. frequently othersites operated by the same entity) and other good sites (e.g. to confusepeople). In various embodiments, link analysis may be a forward orreverse link analysis—that is, fractional reputation scores may bepropagated from an initial site to one or more sites that the initialsite links to, or fractional reputation scores may be propagated from aninitial site to one or more other sites that contain links to theinitial site.

In embodiments, the reputation of Web content, sites, portions of sites,etc., may also be determined through the use of a white list. Forexample, while determining whether an item of Web content is associatedwith a phishing activity, the Web content may be compared to a whitelist of acceptable features, such as content, form, source, and soforth. The use of a white list may reduce the false positive rate of aphishing detection process. The use of a white list may allow precisetuning of a heuristic of which the phishing detection process may becomprised. For another example, a process for allowing or denyingfeatures associated with Web content (such as adware, spyware, spam,phishing, pop ups, cookies, ActiveX components, client-side scripting,uploading files, downloading files, providing personal information, andso forth) may allow a user to add Web content to a white list toindicate that features associated with the Web content should always beallowed. The use of a white list compares favorably to common practicein which a user either provides authorization input prior to theinvocation of Web content or sets an “always allow” or “always deny”Web-wide preference. According to the present invention, the white listmay be a real-time white list and may be updated by a facility otherthan the user, thus providing real-time access to the latest white listinformation and eliminating stale information from the white list, allvia a process that requires limited or no input from the user.

In embodiments, the reputation of Web content may also be determinedthrough automated testing. In one embodiment, this testing may comprisedownloading programs to check for adware. This process may comprisecrawling the Web in search of executable content; automaticallyinstalling the content on a machine by using a heuristic to answerinstalled wizard questions; exercising the installed executableapplications and the system on which the executable applications areinstalled to stimulate the adware into activating; looking forsuspicious network activity, changed systems files, added or modifiedregistry entries, and other indicia of adware activity; and taking ascreen shot to prove that the application was installed and to show thatthe application did its work. In another embodiment, this process maycomprise registering at a Web site to see if the registration results inspam. This process may involve crawling the Web in search of Web formsasking for e-mail information; automatically detecting a characteristicof the Web site, such as business mode or genre, to recognize high-valuesites; running span detection software on incoming e-mail to detectspam, adult content, gambling content, solicitations for fraud, or otherundesirable content; and taking a screen shot to show what a user'sinbox would look like if he were to provide his e-mail address to theWeb site in question. In still another embodiment, the content of a Webpage may be executed, interpreted, or otherwise run to test dynamicproperties of the content. Certain properties of Web pages can beextracted by a static analysis of the page content, whereas otherproperties can be detected by simulating loading and running client-sideexecutable/interpretable content like JavaScript in a simulated Webbrowser. Examples of properties that can be detected via a staticanalysis include ‘on close’ JavaScript events that, for example, mayprevent a user from closing a window and cross-site scripting. Inembodiments, testing may be accomplished with a false credit card,temporary credit card, false check routing number, false ATM card, falsesocial security number (or other false personal information), test emailaccount, test IM account, test messaging account, or the like.

In embodiments, Web content with a good reputation may be provided to auser as a safe alternative to user-selected Web content with a badreputation. For example, a user that requests site X (assuming such asite has a poor reputation) may be provided with a recommendation to usesite Y (assuming such a site has a good reputation). In an embodiment,the process of providing a safe alternative may use categorization datasuch as DMOZ in a process that may comprise finding a popular categoryof Web content, collecting a minimum number of other domains from nearbycategories, and selecting alternatives based upon popularity andsecurity.

In embodiments, the reputation service host 112 may automaticallyrecognize and fill in virtual credit card numbers and automaticallyrecognize and generate unique e-mail addresses. In another embodiment,the reputation service host 112 may provide for automatic end-userlicense agreement analysis. This embodiment may automatically extractinformation on how personal information is treated, for example whetherusing the site or software will result in advertisements or otherundesirable content

In embodiments, the collection facility 116 may involve Web crawling. Inan embodiment, Web crawling may be used to detect the business model ofa Web site. For example, a Web crawl may detect whether a Web siteadvertises (e.g. identifying ads based on image placement and size onpages, recognizing common ad service networks, and so forth). As anotherexample, a Web crawl may detect if a Web site makes money throughtrustworthy means such as providing ad-supported content (e.g. such asthe NY Times or other well known news sites) or pay-for-service (e.g.such as Amazon or other e-commerce providers). If a Web crawl detectsthat there are no payment systems associated with a Web site and thatWeb site advertises, then the Web site may have covert means of makingmoney from user traffic and as a result negative reputation may beinferred. In another embodiment, Web crawling may be used to detect thegenre of a Web site. For example, a Web crawl may identify Web content,Web content associated with finances, Web content associated withpersonal information, and so forth. The Web crawl may identify ‘checkout’, ‘shopping cart,’ and other such links to determine if a Web siteis an e-commerce site. The Web crawl may look for distinct pages linkedfrom a top page or advertisements to see if the Web site is a contentsite. In still another embodiment, Web crawling may proceed through anad network. For example, a Web crawl may repeatedly crawl a site toreceive different ads; may run a Web page to crawl JavaScript ads; andmay detect ads based on size and placement of images, ad servers, and soforth.

In embodiments, the collection facility 116 may involve Web crawling forautomated detection of computer exploits. A computer exploit may occurwhen software or data takes advantages of a vulnerability in anoperating system or a controlling application in order to executeunauthorized commands. The method for detection may involve trapping theeffects of the exploit, not specific to the code itself nor anyparticular vulnerability of which it takes advantage (e.g. bufferoverflows, cross-site scripting, or format string attacks). For anexploit to perform any permanent alteration of behavior, or ongoingtheft or damage of data, to a system, it may persist itself on thetarget computer.

The detection method may be comprised of a technology built foroperating systems that may monitor access to persistent storage andexecution of code. The monitoring may occur at a level that cannot bebypassed by user level applications of the system. The method may thenemploy a unique system of rules and heuristics to filter expectedtraffic and identify unexpected behavior. Upon detection of anyunexpected behavior, the system may analyze the results to identify themalicious process, and describe in laymen terms the exact consequence ofthe exploit.

The method of exploit discovery may involve the collection facility 116automatically opening Internet browsers to navigate the World Wide Web.The collection facility 116 may browse the World Wide Web using a webcrawler to open websites starting from an original website andprogressing through links and associations, the original website listingmay be from a database in the reputation server 110. In an embodiment,the web crawler may also search websites based on the websiteadvertisements. In an embodiment, a plurality of web browsers may beinstantiated, each may be running it's own web crawler. The websites maybe opened with no attempt to install or download software from thewebsite. After a website is opened in a web browser, the operatingsystem may be analyzed to determine if any system changes, browserchanges, code installs, or the like have occurred by opening the webpage. The collection facility 116 may further analyze the offendinginternet locations in an insulated environment to fully audit whateffects the exploit has upon the system, included but not limited to,what unauthorized software may be installed and what default behaviorsof the system are altered. Using a system of rules unique to thebehavior of the browsers, this method may be able to identify whichdomains and specific URLs are utilizing computer exploits.

In embodiments, the analysis facility 122 may include a clone websitedetection facility. Clone websites, such as Internet scams and decoys oflegitimate websites, may not exist in isolation; the cloned websites mayexist as groups of cloned websites, each with a slightly customizedlook. The cloned websites may vary the HTML layout and text literatureby a small amount from an original legitimate website. When a websitewith a bad reputation is discovered by the analysis facility 122, it maybe advantageous to also discover if other cloned websites may exist andto mark those websites as illegitimate cloned websites. The analysisfacility 122 clone detection mechanism may enable detection of exact andapproximate website clones through a automatic mechanism. The mechanismmay also be semi-automatic by requiring verification.

In detecting clone websites, the URLs of websites identified as clonesmay be fed into an automated detection system. The automated system fordetecting additional clone websites may include extracting a list ofprospect phrases from the original cloned website that may be highlyunique, use the prospect phrases in a search engine (e.g. Google orYahoo) to obtain a list of possible clone URLs, perform structural andsemantic analyses of each candidate clone URL to create a “fingerprint”of the candidate clone website, return a rank-ordered list of scoredcandidate clone URLs, and the like. If the score of the candidate cloneURL is above a certain score threshold, the candidate clone URL may beautomatically marked by the analysis facility 122 as a clone website. Inan embodiment, if the candidate clone website is below the scorethreshold, the candidate clone website may still be an approximateclone; the approximate clone websites may be manually verified by atechnician.

In prospect phrase extraction, the HTML of the main homepage of a URLmay be extracted from the clone website. In some cases, meta webpagerefreshes, webpage rewrites of the URL in javascript, and the followingof frame src and iframe src links may be analyzed in order to discoverhow the main homepage may be seen by a user of a web browser. The HTMLand javascript may be stripped from the original clone website, and HTMLentities may be resolved to obtain a plaintext listing of the originalclone website. The plaintext may be tokenized and windows that maycontain consecutive words/tokens may be enumerated; tokens may beproduct names or website names. The consecutive words/tokens may be of apredefined length, 9-10 words/tokens in length for example. Thepredefined length of the consecutive words/tokens may be varied fordifferent types of clone websites. For use in later search strings thetokens may be replaced with the semantic wildcard “*”, this may increasethe possibility of finding additional clone websites with a web search.Each candidate prospect phrase may be scored heuristically. In anembodiment, for each word that may appear in the 50 most common EnglishWeb words the phrase may earn −1 points; the Web words may bepre-generated from other web texts. In an embodiment, for each word thatmay appear in the 50-500 most common English Web words, the phrase earns+2 points, this may prevent prospecting using technical words used inwebsites. In an embodiment, for each word that is the wildcard “*”, thephrase may earn +3 points. After prospect phrases are rank-ordered, thetop phrases may be fed into a search engine and the URLs from the firstpages of results may be recorded as possible clone website candidates.

In the clone fingerprinting, the HTML of the main user-viewable homepageof each candidate clone URL may be extracted. If the main HTML isconstituted by two frames, the frame src HTMLs may be joined into asingle HTML file. To generate the fingerprint representing a structuraland semantic profile of the site, a methodology of lightweightplagiarism detection as known in linguistic forensics literature may beused. The fingerprint may consist of at least one semantic measure andat least one structural measure such as letter bigrams, top HTML tags,top HTML attributes, top images, and the like. The letter bigrams may bepairs of consecutive character sequences in a document. The top tenletter bigrams of the original clone website may be compared to theletter bigrams of the candidate clone website. The candidate clonewebsite may be assigned a level of plagiarism by the number of matchingbigrams from the original clone website. The level of plagiarism may bedetermined to be exact, approximate, nuanceful, genre-similar, or thelike depending on the number of bigrams matches. The top five HTML tags(case sensitive) that may appear in the original clone website homepagemay indicate its layout and may be used to compare to the top five HTMLtags of the candidate clone websites. Idiosyncratic HTML tags may becaught, as some sites use all capital letters, while others uselowercase letters. The top HTML attributes that may appear on theoriginal clone website homepage may be compared to the top HTMLattributes on the candidate clone website, attributes may be “x=y”strings which may lie inside an HTML definition. The use of HTML tagsand HTML attributes may measure idiosyncrasy and may capture layoutaspects like width/height, colors, and CSS styles between the originalclone website and the candidate clone website. Images in HTML may beprofiled as imagename.jpg, width, and height. The top twenty imagedefinitions may detect clones because it may be common for images to beshared within clone websites. To score candidate clones, the fingerprintof each candidate clone may be scored against the fingerprint of theoriginal clone site. The final score may be calculated as the arithmeticmean of scores produced by each of the four semantic and structuralmeasures. If the fingerprint of the candidate clone website meets athreshold compared to the original clone website, the candidate clonewebsite may be another clone website and therefore may be marked as aclone website.

In embodiments, the analysis facility 122 may include a machine learningfacility. Many pieces of information, or features of sites, content,etc., may be gathered about a Web site. The presence of some featuresmay directly lead to a site's classification of reputation. For example,if a Web site harbors spyware, then the site may be classified as aspyware distribution Web site. However, other features do not sodirectly predict a Web site's classification. The machine learning ofthe present invention provides the ability to generate weightings ofwhich features have greatest predictive ability as to whether a Web siteis of good or ill repute.

In embodiments, a number of applications providing functions associatedwith the reputation of Web content are provided. The functions may, forexample, involve Web reputation services such as a service to consumeror businesses providing information about the safety and trustworthinessof Web sites while they surf; controlling which programs are allowed tobe downloaded or installed; controlling which Web sites are allowed toaccept a user's credit card numbers or bank information; controllingwhich Web sites are allowed to accept a user's e-mail address orpersonal information; safe Web searches; filtering or ranking Web searchresults or directories in part by the safest of the matching sites;providing metadata about stores on commerce search sites anddirectories; or providing metadata about downloads on softwaredistribution sites. The functions may, for example, further involveproviding advertising services such as advertising network checkingsites that wish to advertise so as not to advertise unsafe sites. Thefunctions may, for example, further comprise Web filtering services suchas using a proxy cache that uses reputation data to filter Web requestswithout any software on the desktop; parental control software toprevent children from visiting unsafe sites; and Zagat on the Web thatguides a user to the best places and away from the worst. In someembodiments, the analysis facility 122 may also, or instead, reside on aclient device and analyze and annotate sites or content within Websearch results from the client side.

In embodiments, a number of reputation based products may be providedthrough the reputation service host 112. For example, the product may bea protection based program, which may be a software application thatcommunicates with a reputation service and that protects a user fromadware, risky e-commerce, fraud, and giving personal information toaggressive marketers (spammers and so forth). The service may warn auser before he does a dangerous thing. The protection service mayautomatically adjust browser security settings based upon the reputationof a destination Web site. This may disallow client scripting and otherdangerous behaviors on sites with poor or unknown reputations withoutdegrading trusted sites. The service may offer safe alternatives, suchas providing a one-time e-mail address, using a virtual credit cardnumber, and providing a safe alternative to a dangerous program. Theservice may collect user feedback to correct internal data, discover newsites/programs/Web forms, and collect data that cannot be automaticallytested, such as the quality of customer service provided by a Web site.The service may provide parental control to allow a parent to restrict achild from visiting unsafe sites or installing unsafe software or givingout personal information to a site with a poor or unknown reputation.

In embodiments, the product offered through the reputation service host112 may be a site investigator, which may be part of the reputation Website service. This product may be an authoritative source of trust andreputation data associated with Web sites. The product may be embodiedas a Web site that may allow a user to query the reputation of a Website by name and receive, in return, a reputation report.

In embodiments, the product offered through the reputation service host112 may be a fraud eliminator service, which may provide ananti-phishing toolbar that may utilize a heuristic, a black list, awhite list, and/or user feedback to warn a user when he is on afraudulent Web site offering. In another embodiment, the product offeredthrough the reputation service host 112 may be safe search, which may bepart of the Web site offering. The safe search service may involve a Websearch that filter's search results (e.g. such as those obtained throughGoogle or other search facilities) according to the reputation of thecontent returned in the search, thus providing a user with searchresults that contain only the results with known, good reputations. Thesafe search service may involve a Web search that identifies thereputation of sites, content, and the like received as the result of asearch (e.g. through Google or other search facility).

The following examples are provided to illustrate certain userinteractions along with associated reputation service examples.Presently, when a user browses to a photo upload site with a goodreputation to upload his or her latest digital photos, a series ofActiveX controls may be presented for an optimal experience. However, bydefault on many versions of Windows, the user will be blocked fromdownloading these controls, or the user may be presented with an obtusetechnical dialog box by Internet Explorer asking whether the controlshould be downloaded or not. Chances are the user may either not realizethe controls were blocked or answer incorrectly or in a uniformedfashion when prompted to download them, resulting in a poor orsub-optimal experience. Later, the same user may notice a banner adassociated with another site offering information on where to find freemusic. The user clicks on the ads, only to suddenly be prompted withmore questions about ActiveX controls. Again, the user needs technicalknowledge in order to decide that these controls should probably not bedownloaded since they are unknown controls from an unknown site.However, from the user's point of view, the last time the user wasprompted about ActiveX controls at the photo site, things didn't workright if the controls weren't downloaded, so the user downloads thecontrols from the new site. In embodiments of the present invention, theuser may be prompted with reputation information relating to the site toassist the user in making a more informed decision. Similar choices facea user who must understand the nuances of client-side scripting. Whenthe user visits an e-commerce site and fills out an order form,JavaScript or other client-side technology is likely running the site'smenus, checking the form contents for errors etc. In the systemsdescribed herein, a user may be prompted with reputation informationduring such interactions.

Websites may be classified by the system into one or more categories,such as adware distributor; aggressive marketer; risky e-Commerce site;fraudulent site; or the like. For example, a site may be certified in acategory ‘A’ if its safety is validated based on various characteristicssuch as not being in one of the above-referenced categories; having beeninvestigated through Dun & Bradstreet or Hoovers; having been checkedagainst Better Business Bureau or BBBonline lists; having been manuallyvalidated by a person using appropriate criteria; or belonging to apublicly traded company. A site might be certified as safe to use basedon the site having various other characteristics such as the site'spopularity according to available reputation services, the site havingbeen used and vouched for by a host of a reputation service (eitherthrough subjective or objective validation), a site having been aroundfor at least a year, or a site having been tested using automatedsystems that did not trigger any warnings.

In embodiments, additional information may be provided to the user whenvisiting rated Web sites or interacting with content. The informationmay be a customer service phone number, information as to whether salestax is charged in the user's state, the popularity of the site in itscategory, a summary of Google “chatter” about the site, or otherinformation.

In embodiments, a site, a portion of a site, or content within a sitemay be deemed OK, signifying that the site that is not a bad site, withreference to, for example, a certification or automated analysis ofcontent. In embodiments, a site, a portion of a site, or content withina site may be labeled “Unknown,” signifying that the site that has notbeen analyzed.

In embodiments, a user may install a reputation service host 112 on aclient 102, and, following the installation process, the user may beasked if he or she wishes to participate in an anonymous reportingprogram. The program may provide information to a reputation server 110every time the client checks the reputation of a site or the useroverrides a client warning. The information may be collected within thecollection process facility 116, for example.

In embodiments, each piece of user submitted feedback (e.g. to thecollection facility 116) may be tagged with some unique identificationso that all of a user's feedback can be correlated and tracked. At thesame time, each user may be assigned a score reflecting the accuracy offeedback from the user relative to other feedback, or relative to knownreputation evaluations. In this manner, the system may track andappropriately weight user feedback that appears intended to alterreputation assessments for, e.g., promotional purposes.

Numerous types of user feedback may be collected. For example implicitor explicit feedback may be collected about new sites and programs thatare discovered during browsing that are not already in a reputationdatabase. As another example, implicit or explicit feedback may becollected when a user overrides a system-generated warning message andvisits a site or downloads a program that is not recommended.

In embodiments, the reputation service host 112 UI may provide aninterface element such as a drop down list which is always visible. Whena user wishes to leave explicit feedback on a page, he or she mayactivate this interface element and select a rating. Each selection mayrepresent a (non-exclusive) category for a current Web site, page, orcontent. Categories may include safe site, distributes adware, sendsspam, risky e-commerce, fraudulent, or any other suitablecategorization. The selection may take the form of a vote by the userthat the site belongs in that category, which vote may be received andcounted by a reputation service as described herein.

In one embodiment, users may be permitted to provide feedback throughthe collection facility 116 as many times as they like, however only onevote per category per user will be counted. A user may vote for multiplecategories by selecting one first and then returning to select others.For example, the user may click on the Leave Feedback interface elementand select Adware Distributor and then click again on the Leave Feedbackinterface element and select Email Spammer.

After one of the above categories has been selected, a window or messagemay be displayed thanking the user for the feedback. If the userindicated that the site was a risky e-commerce site, then the user isalso given the opportunity to provide additional information about whythe site is a risky e-commerce site. For example, the user may beprovided with a choice among the following categories: customer service,return policy, shipping time, poor product quality, didn't receiveproduct as advertised, or will shop again.

In embodiments, each user's vote may be weighted differently accordingto a user reputation system. The user reputation system may assign aweight to each user according to how trustworthy his or her votes aredeemed to be.

In embodiments, users may have the ability to provide feedback, such asusing the votes described above, about sites and content as well, and areputation service host facility 112 may use this as a source of inputfor evaluating a reputation of the corresponding site. For example,users may vote about sites and programs as well as vote about very lowlevel things like registry changes, additions/changes/deletions of filesfrom system directories, attempts to open/communicate through particularnetwork ports, etc. For example, the question may relate to whether ane-commerce site provided good customer service and delivered the productas advertised or whether the user received lots of pop up ads after aprogram was downloaded and installed. This information can be used togenerate reputation information relating to the site as indicatedherein.

FIG. 6 depicts Internet Explorer running in association with areputation service host 112. In the embodiment of FIG. 6, the host 112has added a new button 602 to the toolbar and uses the status bar 608 totell the user the classification 604 of a current site.

In embodiments, pressing the toolbar reputation button 602 while on apage may bring up a menu offering including several options. Such pageinformation may include an informational dialog window with a high levelsummary of the page and site trustworthiness. On the page will be a linkto the reputation server 110 Website to get more detailed informationabout the page. Such information may be about title, version, date lastupdated and copyright; about links to help information on the reputationservice Website; about feedback provided on the current site; aboutpurchase options (e.g. if using the free version) the user may haveregarding the reputation based Website associated with reputation server110; or about options to configure preferences, such as (a) whether toprovide feedback to a reputation service while using the product or (b)whether to view/edit warnings on sites while using a trial version.

FIG. 7 depicts an informational window 700 that may appear as a resultof pressing the reputation toolbar button 602. Users may click “OK” 702to return to their Web page, “Options” 704 to configure the reputationservice host 112, or “here” 708 to learn more about the site, which maytake the user to a reputation Website on the reputation server 110.

In embodiments, the reputation service host 112 may bring up a warningdialog window, as opposed to the informational dialog described above,when it detects one of the following threats: a form on the page asksfor the user's email address, and the host believes there is a highlikelihood that the user's email address will be given to spammers; aform on the page requests a credit card number, bank accountinformation, or social security number, and the host believes there isreason to be unsure about the reliability of the merchant; the usertries to download a program that the host believes contains spyware,adware, or other malware; the user attempts to visit a page that isbelieved to be a phishing site or have other reasons for poorreputation.

In embodiments, users may have the option of overriding a warning andproceeding with what they were trying to do. If users have opted intoproviding feedback, this override information is sent back to thereputation server as part of the collection facility process 116. Usersmay have the option of having the host 112 store the override decision,so that the same warning is not provided repetitively for an action theuser has decided to take.

In embodiments, dialog boxes and pop ups may include links to helpand/or additional information. Help may be in the form of links to thereputation Web site where up-to-date information may be provided. Thismay additionally encourage users to rely upon the Website as a resourcefor finding out about Web security threats.

FIG. 8 depicts a warning window 800 displayed by the reputation servicehost 112 in response to detecting a threat on the current Website. Theuser may be encouraged to not download the program by making the “Ok, donot download” button large, more specifically, larger than acorresponding “download” button. The user may click on links to learnmore about alternatives, to learn more about the program, or to bypassthe warning and download the program anyway 810.

In embodiments, the reputation service host 112 may place constantlyvarying levels of restriction on the different pages being loaded. Inembodiments, when the host restricts access to a site, site portion,content, or the like, it will place a short notice to this effectsomewhere in the browser window. This may serve as an unobtrusive visualreminder that the host is working in the background and provide a wayfor a user to override default reputation service choices by clicking onthe notice or taking other action within the interface.

FIG. 9 depicts an automatic adjustment to permitted source operations ina browser of a client 102. A small notice 902 may be provided at the topof the page. Clicking on the notice 902 may allow the user to overridethe settings.

The reputation service host 112 may place an icon in a tool trayaccessible through the user interface providing the browser. This iconmay serve as a visual reminder to the user that the reputation serviceclient is functioning. Clicking on the reputation icon may bring up amenu, such as the menu accessed through the toolbar button 602.

If the user is not able to access the reputation data service, then theclient may still use any relevant cached reputation data. The clientdevice may display a warning about unavailability of the reputationservice before the user enters his or her email address or credit cardnumber or downloads a program.

As discussed in connection with the override examples above, inembodiments a user may be able to override warnings from the reputationservice host 112. In embodiments, they may override the followingwarnings: program downloads from adware sites; submitting emailaddresses to aggressive email marketers; submitting information tosuspected phishing sites; or classification of the Website asFraudulent/Phishing, Adware Distributor, Aggressive Email Marketer, orRisky E-Commerce. In embodiments, when users override one of thesewarnings, they may not be warned again in the future when they attemptthe same action. The list of sites that have these warnings disabled maybe deployed as a personal white-list for the user. It may consist forexample of the top-level URL for the page and the type of warning thatwas purposely disabled for the site.

The reputation service host 112 may be deployed as a browser-independentsoftware component. The software may periodically check the reputationserver 110 for the presence of updates and by default transparentlydownload and install them. This download and update process may bemanaged to avoid excessive use of CPU and/or network resources thatmight otherwise impact other client device activity. In embodiments,updates take effect immediately without having to restart programs orthe computer. In other embodiments, the updates take effect on allsubsequent instances of a browser load. In other embodiments, theupdates may take effect following a reboot.

In embodiments, a database associated with the reputation server 110will be consulted by the reputation service host 112 when Web pages arevisited. The database may respond to a query with reputationinformation. For example, the database may respond to a query with thefollowing three types of information: a severity code, domain metadata,and a display message. The severity code may specify whether the clientshould restrict browser settings or warn the user. If the client doeswarn the user, the display message may be shown. The display message mayalso be a message shown to a user when the user presses the toolbarbutton 602 during a visit to an OK or certified site. The domainmetadata may be information about the domain, such as where the domainis located in the world, how long the domain has been registered, anowner of the domain, etc.

In addition to, or instead of, checking URLs against the database, thereputation service host may check Web pages with locally run heuristics.When a heuristic identifies a potential reputation issue, it may producea Severity Code and Display Message as well. Heuristics may be changedfrom time to time, and client updates may be provided on an automated,manual, or scheduled basis.

A single Web page may consist of numerous objects named by URLs. Each ofthese URLs may be looked up in a reputation database through thereputation service host 112. The behavior of the client, or interactionswith the site or content, may be based on the least-trusted securitycode of any of the objects on the page or heuristics which matched onthe page, for example.

Some sites issue HTTP redirections to other sites. If this is the case,the client may ignore the URL of the site issuing the redirect (unlessthe site to which the user is being redirected is classified as Unknown,in which case the classification of the site issuing the redirect shouldbe used). If multiple levels of redirects are used, the client may usethe classification of the most recent non-unknown site in theredirection chain. In this manner the reputation service may avoid falsepositives for sites like tinyURL or advertisement click through sitesthat use redirects without controlling the content of the sites to whichthey are redirecting.

In embodiments, severity codes may be presented in categories. Forexample, they may be categorized as (a) informational: the site iseither classified as Unknown, OK, or Certified, in which case no warningaction is to be taken by the reputation service host 112; (b) warning:the site is classified as Adware, Aggressive Marketing, or RiskyE-Commerce, and the reputation service host 112 should show a warningbar on the browser to alert the user; or (c) critical: the site isclassified as Fraudulent, and the browser should not load any more ofthe current page, and a clear dialog should present a correspondingdisplay message and attempt to keep users from continuing doing whatthey were doing.

In embodiments, systems and methods are provided for warning usersagainst shopping on risky e-commerce sites. In embodiments, riskye-commerce may be assessed by looking at many factors about thee-commerce Website (e.g. where it is located, how long in business,whether it is endorsed by third parties like the BBB, etc.).

In embodiments, user feedback (e.g. provided through the collectionfacility 116) may be used to correct, update, or otherwise modify systemdata. User feedback may also or instead by used to collect data thatcannot be collected automatically, such as whether a business sent aproduct as advertised on or ordered from the site. In embodiments, thesystem also provides users with an override of the systemclassifications (e.g. effectively say “no, this is not an adwaredistribution site”) and the ability to comment on e-commerce sites.There may be a user reputation system that allows the assignment of areputation to each user to gain an understanding or prediction on howmuch to trust the user. The user reputation system may build areputation based on how many things users comment on, how frequently auser tries to override things that are known to be true (versus thingsthat are only believed to be true and therefore may be wrong), etc.

An aspect of the present invention relates to systems and methods forpresenting information relating to the reputation of a Website based atleast in part on the practices of the Website, Website owner, Websiteaffiliates, or a party related to the Website. In embodiments, systemsand methods involve presenting indicia of a Website's reputation to auser attempting to interact with the Website, wherein the reputation isat least in part based on practices associated with the Website. Thepractices may relate to the treatment of personal information. Thetreatment may be based, at least in part, on a historical treatment ofpersonal information, reputation of personal information treatment, anda policy related to the treatment of personal information. Inembodiments, the presentation of the indicia may be made at a time whenthe user is attempting to load personal information, when there is aplace on the site to load personal information, or following the loadingof personal information into the site or Web form.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve presenting indicia of aWebsite's reputation (e.g. through a reputation service host 112 asdescribed in connection with FIG. 1) to a user attempting to interactwith the Website, wherein the reputation is at least in part based onpractices associated with the Website. The practices may relate to theWebsite's reputation, actual performance, perceived performance, orother indicia related to the site's downloading of undesirable,unintended, or otherwise unwanted content. The unwanted content mayinclude, for example, spyware, information not indicated or identifiedby the Website, information not overtly indicated or identified by theWebsite, information hidden on the Website, harmful software, malware,inappropriate content, downloadable file(s), a program, HTLM, ActiveX,an executable file, JavaScript, VBScript, Flash, Java, or other suchcontent.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve presenting indicia of aWebsite's reputation (e.g. through a reputation service host 112 asdescribed in connection with FIG. 1) to a user attempting to interactwith the Website, wherein the reputation is at least in part based onpractices associated with the Website. The practices may relate tomisdirecting users. The misdirection may be based, at least in part, ona trade address, trademark, service mark, service, product, graphics,text, video, a similar URL, or other such information used to misdirectusers. For example, a Website with a poor reputation may steal text orgraphics from a legitimate site and pass them off to be their own, orsuch a site may choose a URL that is similar to another's URL tomisdirect the Web traffic to their site.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve presenting indicia of aWebsite's reputation (e.g. through a reputation service host 112 asdescribed in connection with FIG. 1) to a user attempting to interactwith the Website, wherein the reputation is at least in part based onpractices associated with the Website. The practices may relate to acorporate reputation of a business associated with the Website. Forexample, the corporate reputation may be based, at least in part, on thecorporate address, how long the company has been in existence, how longthe Website has been in existence, whether they have an IP address in arange of addresses with a poor reputation, existence of a trademark,whether they are a spammer, popularity rank, better business bureaurating, ranking of the corporation (based on existence within Fortune1000, Fortune 500, Fortune 100, Fortune 50, Fortune 10), or othercorporate information. The corporate reputation may be based, at leastin part, on two or more of the following pieces of corporateinformation: corporate address, how long the company has been inexistence, how long the Website has been in existence, whether they havean IP address in a range of addresses with a poor reputation, existenceof a trademark, whether they are a spammer, popularity rank, betterbusiness bureau rating, and ranking of the corporation (based onexistence within Fortune 1000, Fortune 500, Fortune 100, Fortune 50, andFortune 10). The corporate reputation may be based, at least in part, ona plurality factors including one or more of the following or anycombination of the following: corporate address, how long the companyhas been in existence, how long the Website has been in existence,whether they have an IP address in a range of addresses with a poorreputation, existence of a trademark, whether they are a spammer,popularity rank, better business bureau rating, and ranking of thecorporation (based on existence within Fortune 1000, Fortune 500,Fortune 100, Fortune 50, and Fortune 10).

In embodiments, systems and methods involve presenting indicia of aWebsite's reputation (e.g. through a reputation service host 112 asdescribed in connection with FIG. 1) to a user attempting to interactwith the Website, wherein the reputation is at least in part based onpractices associated with the Website. In embodiments, the practicesrelate to providing misleading information on the Website. Themisleading information may involve providing a false phone number, falseaddress, false corporate ownership information, or other false,misleading, or temporary information. In embodiments, the practicesrelate to a date of establishing the Website, a date of establishing acorporation associated with the Website, the location of thecorporation, location of the server servicing the Website, or other suchinformation.

In embodiments, a Website's reputation may be assessed based on how aphone number is presented on the Website. For example, a phone numbermay be listed on a Website, and the phone number may misrepresent what,where, or who will be contacted if the number is called.

An aspect of the present invention relates to systems and methods ofassessing the reputation of a Website (e.g. through an analysis facility122 as described in connection with FIG. 1) based on unwanted practicesassociated with the Website. In embodiments, the systems and methodsinvolve assessing a Website's reputation, wherein the reputation is atleast in part based on practices associated with the Website. Thepractices may relate to the treatment of personal information by theWebsite, Website affiliates, owners of the Website, or other parties orentities associated with the Website. The treatment may be associatedwith a historical treatment of personal information. The collection ofthe treatment information may be done empirically or otherwiseevaluated, estimated, or projected. The assessment may be based, atleast in part, on a policy related to the treatment of personalinformation. The presentation of the reputation and or indicia of thereputation may be made at a time when the user is attempting to loadpersonal information, when the Website is presented, following theloading of the personal information, or at another point in the process.

In embodiments, the practices relate to the downloading of unwantedcontent through or from the Website and or protecting a client 102 fromaccepting such download. The unwanted content may include spyware,information not indicated by the Website, harmful software, malware,unexpected content, a downloadable file, a program, HTLM, ActiveX, anexecutable file, JavaScript, VBScript, Flash, Java, or other suchcontent.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve presenting indicia of aWebsite's reputation (e.g. through a reputation service host 112 asdescribed in connection with FIG. 1) to a user attempting to interactwith the Website, wherein the reputation is at least in part based onpractices associated with the Website. The practices may relate tomisdirecting users. The misdirection may be based, at least in part, ona trade address, a trademark, a service mark, a service, a product,graphics, text, video, a similar URL, or other such information used tomisdirect users. For example, a Website with a poor reputation may stealtext or graphics from a legitimate site and pass them off to be theirown, or such a site may choose a URL that is similar to another's URL tomisdirect the Web traffic to their site.

In embodiments, systems and methods involve presenting indicia of aWebsite's reputation (e.g. through a reputation service host 112 asdescribed in connection with FIG. 1) to a user attempting to interactwith the Website, wherein the reputation is at least in part based onpractices associated with the Website. The practices may relate to acorporate reputation of a business associated with the Website. Forexample, the corporate reputation may be based, at least in part, on thecorporate address, how long the company has been in existence, how longthe Website has been in existence, whether they have an IP address in arange of addresses with a poor reputation, existence of a trademark,whether they are a spammer, popularity rank, better business bureaurating, ranking of the corporation (based on existence within Fortune1000, Fortune 500, Fortune 100, Fortune 50, Fortune 10), or othercorporate information. The corporate reputation may be based, at leastin part, on two or more of the following pieces of corporateinformation: corporate address, how long the company has been inexistence, how long the Website has been in existence, whether they havean IP address in a range of addresses with a poor reputation, existenceof a trademark, whether they are a spammer, popularity rank, betterbusiness bureau rating, and ranking of the corporation (based onexistence within Fortune 1000, Fortune 500, Fortune 100, Fortune 50, andFortune 10). The corporate reputation may be based, at least in part, ona plurality factors including one or more of the following or anycombination of the following: corporate address, how long the companyhas been in existence, how long the Website has been in existence,whether they have an IP address in a range of addresses with a poorreputation, existence of a trademark, whether they are a spammer,popularity rank, better business bureau rating, and ranking of thecorporation (based on existence within Fortune 1000, Fortune 500,Fortune 100, Fortune 50, and Fortune 10).

In embodiments, systems and methods involve presenting indicia of aWebsite's reputation (e.g. through a reputation service host 112 asdescribed in connection with FIG. 1) to a user attempting to interactwith the Website, wherein the reputation is at least in part based onpractices associated with the Website. In embodiments, the practicesrelate to providing misleading information on the Website. Themisleading information may involve providing a false phone number, falseaddress, false corporate ownership information or other false,misleading, or temporary information. In embodiments, the practicesrelate to a date of establishing the Website, a date of establishing acorporation associated with the Website, the location of thecorporation, location of the server servicing the Website, or other suchinformation.

In embodiments, a Website's reputation may be assessed based on how aphone number is presented on the Website. For example, a phone numbermay be listed on a Website, and the phone number may misrepresent what,where, or who will be contacted if the number is called.

An aspect of the present invention relates to the presentation and orassessment of a Website's reputation (e.g. through a reputation servicehost 112 as described in connection with FIG. 1) based on the Website'streatment of personal information. Systems and methods may involvepresenting indicia of a Website's reputation to a user attempting tointeract with the Website, wherein the reputation is at least in partbased on treatment of personal information by the Website. The systemsand methods may also involve assessing the reputation of the Website. Inembodiments, the interaction may involve accessing the Website, loadingpersonal information into the Website, following the loading of personalinformation, or otherwise interacting with the Website.

In embodiments the personal information may involve one or more or acombination of the following: name, address, phone number, socialsecurity number, portion of social security number, credit card number,bank number, pin, mother's maiden name, spouse's name, license number,immigration information, purchase information, usemrname, site username, mortgage amount, car loan amount, loan amount, income, or otherpersonal information.

In embodiments, and as indicated in connection with FIG. 2, the step ofpresenting indicia of the reputation occurs when a user attempts toengage in an interaction, after an interaction with a Website, when aWebsite is accessed, or when a user attempts to access a Website. Inembodiments, the interaction involves entering personal information. Theinteraction may be a false interaction, or the interaction may be apreliminary interaction. The preliminary interaction may involve aperceived interaction wherein the user perceives there was aninteraction with the Website, and the interaction was with a reputationservice. The reputation service may present an indication of reputationto the user prior to allowing the interaction with the Website toproceed.

An aspect of the present invention relates to presenting Websitereputation information, or indicia of such reputation, at the time of aninteraction or attempted interaction. In embodiments, the systems andmethods may involve presenting indicia of a Website's reputation to auser attempting to interact with the Website, where the act ofpresenting the indicia follows the user's attempted interaction. Themethod may further involve assessing the reputation. The user may beprevented from interacting with the Website. In embodiments, the usermay be permitted to interact with the Website following an interactionwith a reputation acknowledgement. The presentation may involvepresenting an indication within the GUI associated with the Webpage. Theuser may be permitted to continue to interact with the Webpage.

In embodiments, the presentation of the indicia follows the interaction.The interaction may be a preliminary interaction or a false interaction.The user may proceed with a real interaction following interaction witha reputation indication window.

In embodiments, the step of presenting reputation information mayinvolve presenting audio information and or visual information. Thepresentation may involve presenting a warning of a poor reputation, awarning of an unknown reputation, an indication of a good reputation, orother presentation of information.

In embodiments, the presentation of reputation information may beprovided to a user through a mobile communication facility, mobile Webfacility, desktop facility, laptop facility, PDA, cell phone, or othercomputing facility or client device.

In embodiments, the presentation of reputation information involvespresenting varying degrees of warnings depending on the step ofinteraction. For example, the information may be presented in anincreasingly vocal manner as the user gets closer and closer tocommitting the dangerous act (ranging from a mild warning when the userfirst accesses the site to a scream if the user hits the “submit” buttonto send info to a bad site).

In embodiments, alternatives may be presented at the time of theinteraction (e.g. through a recommendation facility 130 as described inconnection with FIG. 1) where alternatives may be other programs, otherWebsites, alternative personal information (e.g. a unique email addressor credit card number just for this site), or the like.

An aspect of the present invention relates to the warning about unwantedcontent during, prior to, or following a Website interaction. Systemsand methods may involve presenting indicia of a Website's reputation toa user attempting to interact with the Website, wherein the Websiteincludes unwanted content. In embodiments, the systems and methodsfurther involve assessing the reputation.

In embodiments, the unwanted content may include spyware, informationnot indicated or identified by the Website, information not overtlyindicated or identified by the Website, information hidden on theWebsite, harmful software, malware, inappropriate content, downloadablefile(s), a program, HTLM, ActiveX, an executable file, JavaScript,VBScript, Flash, Java, or other such content.

An aspect of the present invention relates to the warning about unwantedcontent during, prior to, or following a Website interaction. Systemsand methods may involve presenting indicia of a Website's reputation toa user attempting to interact with the Website, wherein the Websiteincludes unwanted content. In embodiments, the systems and methods mayinvolve presenting alternatives.

An aspect of the present invention involves warning of a decoy site(e.g. through a reputation service host 112 as described in connectionwith FIG. 1) and or presenting alternatives to a site (e.g. through arecommendation facility 130 as described in connection with FIG. 1).Systems and methods may involve presenting indicia of a decoy Website'sreputation to a user attempting to interact with the decoy Websitefollowing the attempted interaction. The method may further involveassessing the reputation. The decoy Website may include services similarto those of a target Website the user intended to visit. The decoyWebsite may include trademarks similar to those of a target Website theuser intended to visit. The systems and methods may further involvepresenting the user with an alternative Website recommendation. Thealternative Website may have an acceptable reputation. The alternativeWebsite may include a plurality of Websites. The alternative Website mayinvolve a trademark owner's Website, an official corporate Website, hasbeen validated.

An aspect of the present invention relates to presenting alternativeWebsites (e.g. through a recommendation facility 130 as described inconnection with FIG. 1). Systems and methods may involve presentingindicia of a Website's reputation to a user attempting to interact withthe Website, wherein the user is further presented with at least onealternative Website or program as a result of the attempted interaction.The systems and methods may further involve assessing the reputation. Inembodiments, the presentation of alternatives may involve presenting aunique email address, message identifier, screen name, useridentification, credit card number for a single use, credit card numberfor use on the site, or other alternatives designed to protect the user.

An aspect of the present invention relates to assessing and orpresenting Website reputation information (e.g. through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIG. 1) based on domainmetadata. In embodiments, the systems and methods may involve presentingindicia of a Website's reputation to a user attempting to interact withthe Website, wherein the reputation is based at least in part on thecorporate reputation of a business associated with the Website. Thecorporate reputation may be based at least in part on one or more of thefollowing: the corporate address, how long the company has been inexistence, how long the Website has been in existence, whether they havean IP address in a range of addresses with a poor reputation, existenceof a trademark, whether they are a spammer, popularity rank, betterbusiness bureau rating, and ranking of the corporation (based onexistence within Fortune 1000, Fortune 500, Fortune 100, Fortune 50, andFortune 10). The corporate reputation may be based at least in part ontwo or more of the following: the corporate address, how long thecompany has been in existence, how long the Website has been inexistence, whether they have an IP address in a range of addresses witha poor reputation, existence of a trademark, whether they are a spammer,popularity rank, better business bureau rating, and ranking of thecorporation (based on existence within Fortune 1000, Fortune 500,Fortune 100, Fortune 50, and Fortune 10). The corporate reputation maybe based at least in part on a plurality of factors including thecorporate address, how long the company has been in existence, how longthe Website has been in existence, whether they have an IP address in arange of addresses with a poor reputation, existence of a trademark,whether they are a spammer, popularity rank, better business bureaurating, and ranking of the corporation (based on existence withinFortune 1000, Fortune 500, Fortune 100, Fortune 50, and Fortune 10).

An aspect of the present invention relates to presenting and orassessing reputation information (e.g. through a reputation service host112 as described in connection with FIG. 1) based on a Website'scontent. In embodiments, the systems and methods may involve presentingindicia of a Website's reputation to a user attempting to interact withthe Website, wherein the reputation is based at least in part on contentin the Website. The method may further involve assessing the reputation.The content may include an address, an email address, a physicaladdress, a corporate address, a personal address, a phone number,contact information, an indication as to how long the site has existed,where the Website is hosted, a corporate location, an IP address, arange of IP addresses, where the IP address fits within a range of IPaddresses, whether the site requests personal information, and thelocation on the site where the personal information is requested.

An aspect of the present invention relates to assessing and orpresenting reputation information (e.g. through a reputation servicehost 112 as described in connection with FIG. 1) based on a linkstructure associated with the site. In embodiments, the systems andmethods may involve presenting indicia of a source Website's reputationto a user attempting to interact with the source Website, wherein thereputation is at least in part based on reputation of at least onelinked Website linked to the source Website. The systems and methods mayfurther involve assessing the reputation. The reputation may beconsidered acceptable when a substantial portion of the linked Websiteshave acceptable reputations. The reputation may be considered poor whenthe sites to which it links or which link to it have poor reputations.For example, the Website may link to other sites, or the Website ofconcern may link to other sites, and the reputation may be based onthese links. By way of another example, if Website A points to Website Band Website B points to Website C, the systems and methods may stillconsider A linked to C for purposes of analysis. The link structureanalysis may iterate over several levels of linking. Also, theassessment may involve assessing where within the content the linksoccurs. For example, if the link occurs within a user comment section ofa site (e.g. Amazon.com user book reviews), the assessment may bedifferent from that of a link that resides within the content of otherareas of the site (e.g. corporate generated sections).

Aspects of the present invention relate to Web reputation services. AWeb reputation service may calculate and make available a reputation ofWebsites, programs, Web forms, and other entities found on the Internetso that users can make informed decisions about whether to use thoseWebsites, programs, Web forms, etc.

In embodiments, the systems and methods are employed in a softwareapplication that runs on a user's computer (e.g. a portion of areputation service host 112 as described in connection with FIG. 1) andretrieves reputation data from reputation information servers 110 foreach Website the user visits. The software application may providewarnings before a user uses a low reputation Website, program, or Webform. The software may also offer alternatives such as safer Websitesand programs, unique email addresses to enter sites that request emailaddresses, and virtual credit card numbers to use when shopping online.A Web reputation system may warn users as soon as they arrive at a sitethat only exists to engage in dangerous behavior. For Web sites thatoffer legitimate as well as non-legitimate uses, a reputation system maywarn users before they download a low reputation program, fill in orsubmit a low reputation Web form, etc.

Increasingly low reputation Web sites are discovered by users throughsearch engines. Embodiments of the present invention involve safe searchsoftware that may provide the capabilities of traditional Web search,including the normal ranking algorithms used, but with sites with lowreputation filtered out or ranked lower than sites with higherreputations. Alternatively, low reputation sites may be left in thelistings but colored differently so as to alert the user that they arelow reputation sites. In embodiments, the reputation functions may beadapted to augment a search facility (e.g. Google.com).

In embodiments, network proxies can also incorporate reputation data toeither completely filter out requests to low reputation sites, to striplow reputation sites of their dangerous content automatically, or tomodify the appearance of low reputation Websites to mark them for theuser as low reputation. These network proxies could run as a softwareapplication on the user's computer, on the user's home network, in theuser's service provider network, or in an enterprise network.

An aspect of the present invention relates to automatically testingdownloads and tests programs from the Internet (e.g. through an analysisfacility 122 as described in connection with FIG. 1). Programs may bediscovered through a variety of mechanisms including Web crawls. Eachprogram may first be installed, which frequently means that installationwizards must be automated and then the system checked to see if theinstallation succeeded. If the installation did succeed, then the systemshould be tested to determine the safety of the software just installed.

Programs may be tested in virtual machines that run just like they werea real physical computer, but instead are programs. Each physicalmachine can thus run several virtual machines each time, starting themfrom known starting points. This allows multiple programs to each beinstalled and tested from a clean slate very quickly.

Programs may be identified by the URLs they are found under on theInternet and also through checksums or hash codes of their contents.Additionally, in embodiments, checksums or hash codes of prefixes of theprograms may also be used to identify a program as a likely bad programeven before the entire program has been downloaded.

Embodiments of the present invention involve interaction withautomatically downloaded installations and the like. Automatinginstallation “wizards” may require detecting which buttons to press indialog boxes that may cause the installation to succeed. In embodiments,this may use heuristics such as looking for certain buttons and pressingthe buttons (e.g. “Next” or “Yes”), looking for buttons in a preferredorder, or detecting if the installation program is busy.

In embodiments, different buttons in a preferred order may havedifferent probabilities for causing the installation to succeed. Forexample, hitting a “Next” button in a program may cause the installationto proceed; but in rare programs, a button named “Next” may cause theinstallation to not proceed. In embodiments, a button labeled “Yes” mayfrequently cause the installation to proceed; occasionally a buttonlabeled “Yes” may cause a setup program to terminate without installingthe software.

In embodiments, detecting if the installation program is busy doing workmay require the installation to not press any buttons and wait for thework to be complete In embodiments, pressing a button when theinstallation program is busy may frequently be used to cancel theoperations.

In embodiments, not all programs can be automatically installed.Programs that fail to automatically install and be restarted may bemanually installed by a person.

In embodiments, it may be difficult to determine if an installationsucceeded. For example, there may often be several phases ofinstallation involved; the final buttons of an installation may not berecognizable as a finish installation button (e.g. “Finish” or “End”).

In embodiments, a system or method may involve using the heuristics todetermine if the installation succeeded; for example, new executablefiles or libraries may be installed onto the system in places other thansystem temporary directories, new links may be put on the desktop orstart menu, new registry entries may be created with newly registeredlibraries or with entries to start programs at run time, new processesmay be running that were not running when the installation started, orthe like.

An aspect of the present invention may relate to checking for problemsfollowing a download. For example, after a program has successfully beeninstalled, the system may be checked to see if anything malicious ordangerous has been installed on the system. In embodiments, thereputation service host 112 may detect the reputation of the source ofthe download and may initiate investigations relating to the download.In embodiments, a system or method may involve checking, usingheuristics such as check for network connections on a test system, andin particular check for connections to remote systems that are knownadvertising servers. It may check for installation of Internet Explorerbrowser helper objects/toolbars/extensions, check for processes that maybe started automatically on system boot, check for software that maychange settings to lower system security levels so that further softwarecan later be installed without the user's knowledge, check for on-diskand in-memory signatures of known malware software, check the End UserLicense Agreement that the software displays for evidence that thesoftware displays advertisements, monitor the user's Web surfing orsimilar behaviors, check how many pop up windows are opened whensimulated users use the computer, check whether attempts to use popularsearch engines such as Google or Yahoo are intercepted and alternativesearch results presented, check whether the programs installed are onlists of known adware, check whether clicking on pop up window's contentleads to known ad serving networks, or the like.

In embodiments, the simulated user may open Web browsers and do thingsknown to trigger adware, such as using finance sites, gambling sites,travel sites, search engines, or the like.

In embodiments, when a user attempts to access a program that is deemedunsafe, a set of alternatives may be presented that perform a functionsimilar to that of the unsafe program but without the safety issues. Inembodiments, this may be accomplished by using category information fromsources such as the DMOZ/Open Directory Project, Yahoo, categorizationdata from software download aggregators (e.g. download.com ortwocows.com), or the like.

In embodiments, when a dangerous program is detected, the category ofthat program may be searched to find other similar programs (e.g.similar programs within the program category). Those other programs maybe ranked by popularity and safety to find popular safe alternatives torecommend to the user.

ActiveX is a Microsoft technology for enabling Websites to executeclient side code in the context of Internet Explorer. In embodiments,ActiveX code may perform arbitrary system operations and therefore maybe dangerous technology if it allows arbitrary Web sites to operate. Inembodiments, ActiveX may frequently be used to install adware softwareon to unsuspecting Web site visitor's computers. Many legitimate Websites may also use ActiveX to overcome the limitations of HTML. Forexample, photo Web sites may frequently use ActiveX to provide a photoupload capability for their users.

In embodiments, the author of the ActiveX control may frequently bedifferent from the operator of the Website containing the ActiveX code.For example, many legitimate Websites may use Macromedia's Flash ActiveXcontrol to render video-like advertisements; malicious Websites may findbugs in ActiveX controls written by trusted companies, such asMicrosoft, that may allow the otherwise trusted ActiveX control to betricked into doing malicious processes.

Embodiments of the present invention may involve requiring thereputation of the Website using the ActiveX control and the reputationof the author of the ActiveX control both to be good in order for theActiveX control to run or a reputation service host 112 may warn theuser about such. This may be different from existing technology that mayallow the user to either always run the ActiveX, never run the ActiveX,or query the user on a case-by-case basis as to whether the ActiveXcontrol should run (the user may not know the answer to this question).Active scripting, and other technologies involving delivery ofexecutable content to a client device may be similarly conditionallyauthorized by a reputation service as described herein.

Many Websites request personal information about users such as theirname, email address, social security number, or the like. Inembodiments, systems and methods may involve detecting Websites thatrequest personal information by registering on them and detecting howthey use the personal information provided. A reputation service host112 may also look for characteristics of the Website to determine if itis probable that the site's only reason for existence may be to collectpersonal information. Such heuristics may include looking for sites withvery few pages, which may indicate there may be very little content onthe site; looking for sites that may request personal information ontheir first page instead of having these requests deeper within thesite; and looking for sites that request significant amounts of personalinformation (e.g. social security numbers, address, and phone number).There may be standards in the direct marketing industry about whichpieces of information need to be collected, and detecting sites thatcollect these pieces of information may be useful.

In embodiments, sites that request personal information, and inparticular sites that request email addresses, may be detected (e.g. bya reputation service host 112), and this information may be filled ineither through a manual work flow or an automated process. Inembodiments, the email address used may be a unique address that mayonly be given to a single site and which may be sufficiently long andrandom as to be un-guessable by spammers that try to guess emailaddresses. Therefore, any email received by this address may be veryhighly likely to have been sent by the site that this address wasregistered on.

In embodiments, mail received at each address so registered may beassigned a score as to how likely that email may be unwanted spam. Forexample, each site's score may be computed based on the number of emailsreceived to the unique address and the spam score of each message. Inembodiments, sites that receive a high score may be aggressively usingthe personal information entered.

Sometimes it may be difficult to detect that a Website has a form on itthat collects email or other personal information or to detect wherethat information may be sent because the Webpage uses JavaScript orother client side scripting. In embodiments, the page may actually loadand execute in an environment that emulates a Web browser. The OnSubmitand other related events may need to be fired to cause the code in theWebpage to actually run. The page may be monitored while the code isrunning to see what forms are generated and where the information issent.

In embodiments, when a user encounters a form on a site that mayaggressively use email addresses entered on it, the reputation servicehost 112 (e.g. through a recommendation facility 130) may offer tocreate another unique email address just for that user to use on theWebsite. Email sent to this unique email address may be forwarded on tothe user's actual email account. Then, if the site aggressively emailsthe user or sells the user's email address, the user may easily disablejust that one unique address and stop receiving the email.

In embodiments, the provider of the reputation information may benefitby being able to scan each email message that passes through for spam asdescribed above and thus may be able to analyze sites that collect emailaddresses that were not known about or with which the provider was notable to register.

It may be relatively difficult to determine solely on the basis ofend-user experience whether shopping on a Website is safe. It may beeasy to create professional looking sites, and there may be few othercues to guide users as to whether they should feel safe on the site ornot. The potential threats from dangerous sites may range from outrightfraud and theft of personal and financial information to more mundaneproblems such as poor customer service and onerous return policies.

In embodiments, systems and methods may involve providing a warning onsites that may be deemed high risk for e-commerce. This may not be basedon actual direct testing of the Website, which may entail makingpurchases from each Website. Instead, in embodiments, the system mayanalyze indirect information to come to conclusions about the likelihoodthat an e-commerce site should be used or avoided.

Embodiments of the present invention may involve machine learning.Machine learning may provide a means to take a large collection of inputinformation called features—such as the words on a Web page, where thesite is hosted in the world—about Websites and collections of known goodand bad sites and then determine the relevancy of the features inpredicting whether a site is good or bad. Specifically, in certainembodiments, weights assigned to each feature may determine whether asite is a good site or a bad site as computed based on the training dataof known sites. Then, as new sites may be found, the features for thatsite may be computed and then weighted to decide if the new site maylikely be good or bad, based on the machine learning algorithm'sexperiences with the training data.

In embodiments, features collected from Websites (e.g. through acollection facility 116) that may provide an indication of reputationmay include the set of words on the site; the set of images on the site;geographic location of the site; length of time the domain for the sitehas been registered; age of the site; what ISP is hosting the site;whether the site is hosted as part of the ISP reserved for consumer PCsor business PCs; whether the site uses SSL to protect transactions; thenumbers of pages on the site, of links off the site, of links on thesite, and of scripts present on the site; the set of all ActiveXcontrols used by the site; whether the site loads client side JavaScriptor other scripting code from other domains; whether the siteautomatically redirects visitors to other sites; whether the siterequests personal information such as email address, name, address,phone number, etc., on the first page users visit on the site; whetherthe site advertises on other Websites; whether the site advertisesthrough spam messages; whether the site advertises through adwareprograms; which SSL certificate vendor is used; whether the site has adomain name and, if so, how long it is registered for and whether it wasregistered using a third party registration service that obscures theidentity of the actual owner; or the like.

Embodiments of the present invention may use and/or interact withinformation that may be collected and/or made available through otherreputation sites and facilities. For example, a reputation facility,according to the principles of the present invention, may receiveinformation from Better Business Bureau online (or book form of suchinformation), TrustE, P3P, Hackersafe certification, Fortune 1000,Hoovers, D&B, Yellow Pages, DMOZ/The Open Directory Project, Yahoo,credit card certified online merchants, or the like.

Embodiments of the present invention may involve receiving user feedbackthrough a collection facility 116. Users may have chosen to do businesswith an establishment that may possess good data on the reputation ofthe business. User feedback may allow individual end users to vote as towhether an e-commerce site is good or, if not, why it's not. Individualusers may have a reputation themselves that determines how heavily theirvote counts. The longer a user has been around, the more sites voted on,and the greater the breadth of categories of sites that a user votes on,the higher that user's vote may be weighted.

Embodiments of the present invention may involve virtual credit cardnumbers. When a user is requested to enter a credit card by a suspecte-commerce site, a recommendation facility 130 may provide a virtualcredit card number to use. A virtual credit card number may be a validcredit card number linked to the user's actual credit card number, butwith restrictions placed on it such as the length of time it is valid orthe maximum charge that can be made on it. In this manner, when a useris not sure about the reputation of a site, the user may use a creditcard that may only allow a small amount to be charged to it and whichmay expire in twenty-four hours. Embodiments may involve gaining insightinto any disputes filed against the merchant and on which sites usersmay choose to use virtual credit card numbers.

Embodiments may relate to protecting users against phishing and/ordeceptive sites. Many Websites may attempt to trick the user intothinking the user is on a different Website from that the user reallymay be on or to take advantage of users who inadvertently go to thewrong Website. For example, users may be tricked into providing theirbank account numbers if they go to a Website that looks like theiractual bank but which may be a fraudulent site. Users may also beconfused by sites that attempt to look like other popular branded sitesand trick the user into using the wrong site.

Phishing may involve the practice of tricking the user into enteringtheir bank or other financial information into a Website they think maybe their actual bank or other financial institution but which may be afraudulent site attempting to steal financial information. Frequently,this may be done by sending spam emails to users in which the email maypretend to be from the users' bank and may ask the users to click on alink in the email to log into their bank. The link in the email may notlink to the user's bank but instead may be a link to a fraudulent sitethat may look exactly like the actual bank's Website.

Existing technology may defend against phishing sites by using blacklists of known phishing sites and by using heuristics/rules that run onthe user's computer to detect when a likely phishing site may bevisited. However, both of these approaches may have significantweaknesses. Black lists may be very slow to create and distribute, so bythe time the user has an updated black list the phishing attack may havedone most of its damage. Heuristics may check for characteristics ofphishing sites such as the site not being registered in DNS. However,there may be a significant false positive rate with heuristics as manylegitimate sites may have characteristics of phishing sites.

Certain embodiments may combine black lists and heuristics with a whitelist of all the sites that have a good reputation and thus may reducethe level of false positives. Heuristics may remain very good atdetecting true positive cases while the white lists may remove the falsepositives.

In embodiments, heuristics used may include the country in which the IPaddress for the site is located, presence or lack of a registered domainname for the site, age of the domain name if there is one, whether thepage contains forms, whether the site may be hosted on a site known toallow third parties to create their own Web pages (e.g. Geocities orTripod), whether the site's IP address may be in an ISP's DHCP assignedaddress range, whether SSL is used to protect the site, whetherJavaScript or other client side scripting may be used to open windowsthat are always kept in front of the rest of the browser to overlayinformation onto the Webpage, the number and type of grammar errors onthe page, whether content on the page uses images or other content frombanks or other financial organizations (either directly linked off thefinancial institutions Website or copied from the institution'sWebsite), or the like.

In embodiments, the page may contain forms that may ask for credit cardnumbers, expiration dates, social security numbers, passwords,usernames, or login information. Forms may also have their contentchecked before submission to see if the actual data in them look like acredit card number, social security number, password, email address, orthe like.

Pharming is the name sometimes given to the practice of attackersmodifying pieces of the DNS system so that users may think they arevisiting a particular Web site but are in reality visiting a fraudulentsite run by the attackers. For example, a user may think he or she isvisiting fidelity.com, but an attacker may have modified aspects of thename resolution system so that fidelity.com resolves to the attacker'sWebsite instead, where the attacker may steal the user's Fidelityusername and password.

In embodiments, the systems may guard against pharming by recordingtraits of the IP address of good Websites and comparing those traits atthe time the user may try to visit the site. It may be unlikely that anattacker is able to compromise any significant fraction of the DNSsystem, so a reputation service may be able to resolve the correct IPaddress for a domain name. Then the service may compute certainunlikely-to-change information about the address such as the country inwhich the IP address resides, whether the site uses SSL, what theauthoritative name servers for the domain are, whether the IP address isa DHCP assigned address in an ISPs address range, or the like.

When a user visits the same site, the same traits may be computed andcompared. If they differ, then there may be a high chance that the useris no longer visiting the same site visited previously. The site may bedifferent from the site tested and therefore may likely be a fraudulentsite. This may be especially useful when applied to financial sitessince they may be very unlikely to change the above traits for theirWebsites.

Some Websites may try to either confuse users into visiting them bynaming themselves after other well known brands or by making their siteappear similar to well known branded sites. In embodiments, a system maycompare the sites content to frequently impersonated sites to look forsites trying to use content that may be similar or using domain namesthat are similar. The system may also look for sites that make heavy useof trademarked terms from another company.

In embodiments, if a site is a link farm site then it may be more likelyto be a decoy and not the actual site the user intended to visit. Thelink farm site may be a site that may have many pages of content of itsown and may contain numerous links to other Websites and/oradvertisements.

Web crawling may involve the process of automatically visiting Websitesand fetching the Web pages on those sites. In embodiments, Web crawlingmay be used in order to analyze the content on the Web sites.

In embodiments, a system may target parts of the Web that may be likelyto be used heavily or may be likely to contain low reputation content.Data sources used to guide this process may be lists of the most popularWeb sites visited, lists of sites advertised in spam messages, sitesadvertised on other sites, sites advertised in pop up windows fromadware, sites advertised on search engines based on querying the searchengines for permutations of popular search terms, sites advertised onsearch engines based on querying the search engines for permutations ofhigh bid price keyword search advertising terms (certain words cost moreto bid for than other words when placing ads on search engine listings;high price words indicate there may be a strong business model behindthe sites that may advertise using those words), sites that attempt todo e-commerce, sites that register programs for downloads on populardownload Websites such as download.com and twcows.com, or the like.

Websites may use client side scripting technology such as JavaScript orVBScript to alter the content of a page when the page is loaded into aWeb browser. These alterations may include adding elements to the pagethat offer programs for download, solicit personal information, acceptpayment for commerce, cause the browser to load an entirely differentWeb page, or the like. In embodiments, these behaviors may be used toassess a reputation.

Static analysis of a Web page and its associated client side scriptingmay not easily tell how a page may alter itself if the page were to beloaded and executed in a Web browser. In embodiments, certain traits maybe used to indicate that the page can be analyzed statically, such asthere is no JavaScript, VBScript, or other client side scripting on thepage; the page and the scripting on the page do not execute anydynamically generated code or page contents; the page and the scriptingon the page do not execute any code contained on other pages; or thelike.

In embodiments, if any of the above traits is found on the page, thenthe page may be loaded into an environment that simulates theenvironment a browser may provide, and then the content in the page maybe executed. Once the page has executed, the potentially newly alteredWeb page may be analyzed.

Low reputation Websites may frequently link to other low reputationWebsites, but good reputation Websites may not frequently link to lowreputation Web sites. In embodiments, systems may analyze the linkstructure among sites to infer the reputation of sites based on thereputation of other sites.

For example, if site A links to site B, then site A may inherit somefraction of the reputation of site B. Site A may link to a set of sitesC, in which case A's reputation may be a function of the reputation ofthe sites contained in C. In embodiments, the function used to calculatehow A's reputation is affected by the sites in C may be a uniformaverage reputation of all sites in C, a weighted average reputation ofall sites in C (in which the weight of each site in C may be based onthe popularity of the site), a fixed amount if any of the sites in Chave reputations below a threshold, and a fixed amount if any of thesites in C are fraudulent, distribute adware or other malware software,collect personal information to sell, are spammers, or the like.

In embodiments, each site is represented as a node in a graph and thelinks between sites as edges in the graph. In such embodiments existinggraph theory algorithms may provide a way to approximate the adjustmentto each site/node's reputation based on the starting reputations thatmay be known for some sub-set of the sites/nodes in the graph. That is,initially, there may be many sites of which only some may havereputations known when the algorithm starts. Standard algorithms mayprovide a way to iteratively update the reputation of each node based onneighboring nodes' reputations; thus reputations may be computed fornodes that did not otherwise have a known reputation.

In embodiments, it may be useful to determine the business model ofWebsites. For example, if a Website is spending money to advertiseitself but does not provide a way to accept payment and does notadvertise on its own site, then there may be a non-obvious revenuesource for the site such as selling personal information or distributingadware laden software.

The business model of a site may be calculated by crawling the Weblooking for sites that advertise (call this site A) or crawling site Alooking for revenue generators; these may include e-commerce indicatorssuch as shopping carts, credit card fields, or ad supported contentindicators (for example lots of pages of which many containadvertisements from known advertising networks). If crawling site Alooking for revenue generators did not provide an apparent revenuesource, and if site A collects personal information or distributesdownloadable software, then site A may have a higher probability ofengaging in selling personal information or distributing adware.

Websites and programs may frequently have End User License Agreements(EULAs) which may constitute legal agreements that users may have toagree to in order to use the Website or program. These agreements may beobtuse, long and sometimes hard to find on the Website or in theprogram. In practice, users may rarely read these agreements and so maynot understand what they are agreeing to when they use a Website orprogram.

In embodiments, systems (e.g. collection facility 116) may automaticallyextract information from EULAs and summarize it for the user.Information about whether personal information is collected, whetherthat personal information is shared or sold to other parties, whetherextensions are installed into the user's Web browser, whetheradvertisements are displayed, or the like may be extracted from theEULAs

In embodiments, there may be several mechanisms for extractinginformation, such as using machine learning models of EULAs that do theabove mentioned things or people who read the EULAs and report back.

In embodiments, the machine learning models of EULAs that do the abovementioned things may be built. Training sets of EULAs that do not shareinformation, advertise, or the like and sets of EULAs that do shareinformation, advertise, or the like may be collected and used to trainthe parameters of the model to correctly predict whether EULAs not inthe training sets contain language about advertising, sharing personalinformation, etc.

In embodiments, people may read the EULAs and report back; these peoplemay either be paid employees of a reputation assessment business orvolunteers contributing information back.

In embodiments, a Web protection product may consist of a piece ofclient software running on the end user's desktop in the form of abrowser plug-in for Internet Explorer and Firefox. The desktop softwaremay communicate back with a reputation based server 110 to look up thereputation of every site that users may be visiting. The database ofsites may be relatively large, so it may not be downloaded to the clientcomputer.

The client may cache information locally as it is looked up so thatrepeated visits to the same site may not require time consuming lookups. In embodiments, this cache may be stored in encrypted form toprotect the reputation server host site data it contains from beingstolen, reverse engineered, or the like. This cache may also bepre-loaded with reputation data of the most popular Websites when theclient is first installed.

In embodiments, each entry in the cache may be stored as a Windowsstructured storage IStream and/or IStorage. Windows restricts the lengthof names that can be stored in these containers, so the client may hashthe name of each site into a number with few enough digits to serve asthe Windows IStream and/or IStorage name. Multiple sites may have thesame hash, so collisions may be handled by storing the actual URL nameinside each IStream/IStorage as well.

In embodiments, the client may be downloaded as a single .exe file thatcontains within itself a compressed copy of browser plug-in dynamic linklibraries (DLLs) for each supported browser. The .exe, when run, mayserve as an installer program that may uncompress and install theseDLLs. The .exe may then serve as a browser independent server that mayrun on the user's system to handle requests from the browser plug-inDLLs.

This may allow a single executable file to be downloaded that may serveas the installer for the reputation product, the uninstaller, and theactual software itself. Combining this functionality into a single filemay reduce the total amount of data that may be downloaded by the userto install the product and may reduce the dependencies on the user'scomputer among multiple files and thereby may increase the reliabilityof the product.

In embodiments, a Website reputation related graphical user interface(GUI) may be provided. For example, there may be two general types ofinformation displayed through a GUI such as non-modal (ambient) info(e.g. information to which the user can choose to respond or justignore) or modal info (e.g. information that requires a response fromthe user).

In embodiments, the non-modal information may come in two forms. A toolbar button may appear on the menu bar of the browser and may always bepresent. FIG. 10 illustrates such a button 1000. Also, in certain casesthe system may show information as an in-page message in the actual HTMLpage. This information may appear only when the current page contains aform consisting of at least two fields. On such pages, light translucenthighlights on form fields may be indicated as Green (good), Red (bad),or Yellow (unknown). FIG. 11 illustrates an in-page message 1100according to the principles of the present invention. In thisembodiment, the in-page message 1100 is indicating that the reputationservice host 112 has information assessing that the reputation of thesite relative to using personal information is acceptable; the in-pagemessage 1100 may be generated by the warning/alert facility 114.

In embodiments, a system may also have tool-tips when the user rolls orhighlights certain fields in the forms (e.g. they may be represented inthe graphic as a box or as the built in windows tool-tip graphics). Thetool-tips may read email fields or credit card/login/pass/accountfields, etc.

In embodiments, the email fields may state “You'll receive Nemails/week”. In embodiments, there may also be a small button next toemail form fields that when pushed may insert a disposable email addressinto the form field.

In embodiments, the credit card, login, pass, account. # fields may tellthe user “We've tested it! It is safe to enter info into this form,”“We've tested it! It is NOT safe to enter info into this form,” “Sorry,we've tested over 100,000 forms but haven't discovered this form yet. Werecommend care,” or similar messages.

In embodiments, modal messages may be dialog boxes that may call “Alertboxes” or “Alerts.”. These boxes may be literally modal in the sensethat the user must push a button on the dialog box before continuing toclick on the browser window that triggered the dialog box.

In embodiments, a system may display an alert when the user is about toperform a bad “transaction,” such as submission of a form or downloadingof a program.

In embodiments, a system may also display a pre-transaction alert inorder to save the user the hassle of discovering the site's potentialharm after the user has already entered info. In embodiments, the systemmay be adapted to only display pre-transaction alerts when it may bevery high likelihood that the user would encounter a transaction alertin the very near future.

In embodiments, the system may only show the spammer pre-transactionalert when the user may be on a known spammer site and/or the user maybe clearly on a page with form fields and/or email/credit card orsimilar fields. A system may display an adware pre-transaction warningwhen users are on a publisher's site but not when they may be on anaggregator.

In embodiments, for unsafe commerce, phishing, and decoy sites thereputation service host 112 may show the pre-transaction alerts when theuser first comes to the site. In embodiments, the alert may be presentedunless the unsafe e-commerce site may be a well known high reputationsite such as Amazon or Yahoo!

FIG. 12 illustrates a transaction alert 1200 produced by a warning/alertfacility 114 for unsafe e-commerce, spammer, decoy, and phishing. Thisalert may appear for example after a user presses “Submit” on a form onany sites labeled as any of these four bad categories. The submissionaction may not be executed by the computer system prior to presentingthe alert 1200.

FIG. 13 illustrates a transaction alert 1300 produced by a warning/alertfacility 114 for downloads. The transaction alert 1300 may be produced,for example, in connection with a download that carries a poorreputation or from a source that contains a poor reputation.

FIG. 14 illustrates a transaction alert 1400 produced by a warning/alertfacility 114 for adware sites. The transaction alert may be produced,for example, in connection with an interaction that carries a poorreputation or in connection with a source that contains a poorreputation.

FIG. 15 illustrates a transaction alert 1500 produced by a warning/alertfacility 114 for decoy sites. The transaction alert may be produced, forexample, in connection with an interaction that carries a poorreputation or in connection with a source that contains a poorreputation.

FIG. 16 illustrates a transaction alert 1600 produced by a warning/alertfacility 114 for unsafe shopping. The transaction alert may be produced,for example, in connection with an interaction that carries a poorreputation or in connection with a source that contains a poorreputation.

FIG. 17 illustrates a pre-transaction alert 1700 produced by awarning/alert facility 114 for spammers. The transaction alert may beproduced, for example, in connection with an interaction that carries apoor reputation or in connection with a source that contains a poorreputation.

Referring to FIG. 18, aspects of the present invention involve anelectronic commerce system 1800 which may provide interactivecommunications and processing of business transactions between users1802. The system 1800 may permit users 1802 such as buyers, sellers,etc., at remote sites 1804 to conduct business transactions andcommunicate with databases 1808 associated with other computing services1810 from a variety of remote terminals 1812. The communication with thedatabases 1808 may without limitation involve an SQL query, an XQueryquery, a tier in an n-tier architecture, and/or a Web service.Generally, the remote terminals 1812 may include a processor; a memory(such as RAM, Flash, EEPROM, or any other suitable computer memory); abus that couples the processor and the memory; an optional mass storagedevice (such as and without limitation a fixed magnetic disc, aremovable magnetic disk, a flash memory device, a EEPROM, a ROM, a RAM,a fixed optical device or disc, a removable optical device or disc, aholographic device or disc, removable quantum memory device, a fixedquantum memory device, a tape, a punch card, or any other suitablememory device or disc) coupled to the processor and the memory throughan I/O controller; and a communications interface (as described below)coupled to the processor and the memory.

In some embodiments, the users 1802 may comprise and employ humans tointeract with the electronic commerce system 1800. The humans maymanually conduct the business transactions and communicate with thedatabases 1808 via the remote terminals 1812.

In other embodiments, the users 1802 may comprise and employ automaticcomputers to interact with the electronic commerce system 1800. In thiscase, the users 1802 may constitute the remote terminals 1812. Theautomatic computers may, as the remote terminals 1812, programmaticallyor automatically conduct the business transactions and communicate withthe databases 1808.

In any case, the remote terminals 1812 may without limitation comprise apersonal computer, a workstation, a server, a blade server, a mobilecomputer (such as and without limitation a laptop, a personal digitalassistant, a portable media player, and so forth), a cellular phone, atelevision set-top box, a videogame console, an interactive kiosk, athin client, a dumb terminal or ASCII terminal, a display device (suchas an LED display, a plasma display, an LCD display, a digitalprojector, a CRT display, a holographic display, and so forth), adigital advertising display (which may comprise a display device or anyother suitable electronic display employed to deliver an advertisingmessage in a public or private space), and so forth.

In some embodiments, it may be advantageous to combine one or more ofthe aforementioned remote terminals 1812 into logical remote terminals1814, which may perform as remote terminals 1812 in the system. This maybe particularly true in the case where the users 1802 are humans. Forexample and without limitation, a digital advertising display, which mayprovide output to a user, may be used in conjunction with a cellularphone, which may capture input from the user. Together, the digitaladvertising display and the cellular phone may behave as one of thelogical remote terminals 1814, which may perform as one of the remoteterminals 1812.

Since the logical remote terminals 1814 may function as remote terminals1812, it should be appreciated that any reference to the remoteterminals 1812 may be read as a reference to both the remote terminals1812 and the logical remote terminals 1814, and vice versa.

In embodiments, some of the remote sites 1804 may comprise remotecomputer systems through which operators, who may be the users 1802 ormay be associated with the users 1802, may communicate with the remoteterminals 1812. Alternatively or additionally, some of the remote sites1804 may comprise automatic computer systems, which may communicate withthe remote terminals 1812. These automatic computer systems may includemass storage devices for storage of remote databases. Alternatively oradditionally, some of the remote sites 1804 may simply comprise theremote terminals 1812 and the users 1802.

The users 1802 may comprise market participants in an interactive marketthat may be facilitated by the electronic commerce system 1800.Generally, the users 1802 may include a wide variety of marketparticipants in an industry market as well as other service providersand interested parties. The users 1802 who gain full access to theservices 1810 of the electronic commerce system 1800 may have all of theservices 1810 of the electronic commerce system 1800 available to them.The users 1802 who gain full access to the services 1810 of theelectronic commerce system 1800 may without limitation include marketparticipants such as and without limitation sellers (such asdistributors and suppliers), buyers, freight service providers,financial service providers, commercial service providers, informationservice providers, and proprietary service providers.

The users 1802 who have only gained partial access to the services 1810of the electronic commerce system 1800 may only gain access to theservices 1810 to which they are authorized to have access. The users1802 who gain partial access to the services 1810 of the electroniccommerce system 1800 may without limitation include affiliates, marketanalysts, shopping comparison services, consumer reporting agencies,governmental regulators, and so forth.

Some or all of the users 1802 may provide some or all of the computingservices 1810 and/or some or all of the databases 1808. To thesecomputing services 1810 and/or databases 1808, these users 1802 mayauthorize some or all of the users 1802 to have access.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 18. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Thereputation service host 112 may provide its services during aninteraction between users 1802, between the users 1802 and the remotesites, between the users 1802 and the remote terminals 1812, between theusers 1802 and the logical remote terminals, and in connection withcomputing services 1810 and/or database 1808 interactions. Inembodiments, the reputation service host 112 may provide servicesrelated to collection of reputation information 116; providing warnings,alerts, and the like 114; providing analysis of reputation information122; monitor changes 124; and/or make alternative recommendations 130.

Referring to FIG. 19, the remote sites 1804 may communicate with acentral processing facility 1902, which may provide the computingservices 1810 and/or the databases 1808, both of which are describedhereinbefore with reference to FIG. 18.

The central processing facility 1902 may comprise a central processingunit coupled to a communications interface and a mass storage system.The central processing unit may provide a local processing capability.The mass storage system may comprise a local mass storage device and ora remote mass storage device. In any case, the mass storage system maystore a central database, which may include at least one of thedatabases 1808. The central database may comprise a relational databasemanagement system, a stream database management system, a row-optimizeddatabase management system, a column-optimized database managementsystem, a distributed database management system, a remote databasemanagement system, an XML database management system, a flat filesystem, an object relational database management system, or any othersuitable database management system.

Communications interfaces may, without limitation, comprise networkinterfaces and may provide operative coupling to an electronic networkfacility 1904 through which the remote terminals 1812, perhaps on behalfof the users 1802, may access the central processing facility 1902and/or its mass storage system. This access may avail the user 1802 ofthe computing services 1810 and/or the databases 1808. Likewise, throughan electronic network facility 1904, the central processing facility1902 may be operatively coupled to another central processing facility1902, which may be included in the electronic commerce system 1800 ormay be included in another electronic commerce system 1800, as shown.This operative coupling may allow the user 1802 of one centralprocessing facility 1902 in one electronic commerce system 1800 toaccess another central processing facility 1902 and/or anotherelectronic commerce system 1800. In other words, the electronic commercesystem 1800 may be linked to other electronic commerce systems 1800.

The operative coupling provided by the communications interfaces maywithout limitation comprise a wired physical network connection, awireless physical network connection, a network socket, a logicalnetwork port, a dial-up modem, or any other suitable physical or logicalnetwork or communications connection. The operative coupling between theelectronic network facility 1904 and the other facilities may facilitatea communication of information as described here and in the documentsincorporated herein by reference.

The electronic network facility 1904, without limitation, include theInternet, an intranet, an extranet, a local area network, a virtuallocal area network, a metropolitan area network, a wide area network, apublic network, a private network, a virtual network, a virtual privatenetwork, a secure network, an open network, a packet network, anasynchronous packet network, a synchronous packet network, a circuitswitched network, an analog network, an electronic network, a wiredelectronic network, a wireless network, a wireless radiofrequencynetwork, a wireless microwave network, a wireless or free space opticnetwork, an optical network, a fiber optic network, an encryptednetwork, a quantum encrypted network, a point-to-point network, apeer-to-peer network, an ad-hoc network, an infrastructure network, orany other network or combination of networks suitable fore-commerce-related communications, functions, and transactions asdescribed herein.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedin association with any of the communications identified in connectionwith FIG. 19. For example, while many of the embodiments herein disclosethe use of interactive reputation services from a client, a remote site1804 may employ such techniques to identify potentially low reputatione-commerce systems. In such an event, the site 1804 may terminate itsconnection with the e-commerce system or take other actions to warn orprotect the site and/or a user of the site. In other embodiments, aninteractive reputation platform 100 may be deployed in connection withthe communications between a user 1802 and the remote site, and theplatform 100 may monitor potential or actual interactions between thesite 1804 and the other facilities identified in connection with FIG.19, such as the central processing facilities 1902 or e-commerce system1800.

Referring to FIG. 20, the electronic commerce system 1800 may becharacterized in part as one or more computing services 1810 thatprovide electronic commerce functionality either to e-commerce sites ordirectly to consumers. This may include, for example, electroniccommerce procedures pertaining to one or more of the following: a saleof a good or service, an advertisement, a recommendation, an instance ofmetadata, a price, an affiliate, a transaction, a schema, a privacypolicy, a portal, a user interface, and/or a communication ofinformation. E-commerce-related services may be deployed as integratedservices such as a shopping website, or the services may be deployedatomically in any number of configurations. For example, individualservices may include a shopping cart, a credit card transaction engine,a product search engine, and a price or feature comparison engine, andso on, all of which may be combined in a deployment of an e-commerce Website. It should be appreciated that a plurality of computing services1810 may be provided concurrently or sequentially to support aparticular transaction or user experience. It should also be appreciatedthat computing services 1810 may be delivered to multiple users and/ormultiple instances of a single user with techniques such asmultiprocessing, multithreading, and/or distributed computing.

Reputation services, as described generally above, may be combined withe-commerce-related computing services 1810 in a variety of ways toachieve reputation-based electronic commerce systems. A number of suchcombinations are discussed in more detail below.

The computing services 1810 may relate to sale of goods or services.This may include, without limitation, the following generally recognizedcategories of goods and services: adult, apparel, audio and video,automotive, baby, baby registry, wedding registry, beauty, bed and bath,books, camera and photo, cell phones and service, computer and videogames, computers, digital books, DVDs educational electronics, financialservices, friends and favorites, furniture and decor, food, gourmetfood, health and personal care, home and garden images, information,jewelry and watches, magazine subscriptions, maps, movie show times,music, musical instruments, office products, outdoor living, petsupplies, pharmaceuticals, real estate, shoes, software, sports andoutdoors, tools and hardware, toys and games, travel, video, weather,wish list, and/or yellow pages.

Reputation services may be employed to evaluate a Web site or domainthat offers goods and/or services for sale. By way of a non-limitingexample, a reputation service may intervene before user navigation to aWeb site that is known to generate large numbers of pop-ups. Reputationservices may also, or instead, be employed to evaluate sources ofcontent within a reseller Web site. Thus, for example, a travel Web sitemay provide links to various travel agents and/or providers such as carrental companies, airlines, and hotels. As described above, a reputationservice may evaluate the Web site based upon an aggregated evaluation ofproviders listed on the site, or the reputation service may operate toprovide reputation information for specific providers when hyperlinksare selected. In one embodiment, a browser plug-in may operate toevaluate hyperlinks, and to embed reputation-based icons within a pageduring rendering so that a user receives immediate, visual feedbackconcerning reputation for a number of providers that have links in apage such as a directory.

The computing services 1810 may relate to advertising. Advertising mayinclude, without limitation, one or more of the following: aggregatingadvertisements; providing a Web site containing only advertisements;attention brokering; bidding to advertise; communicating with at leastone of the users 1802; accepting, rejecting, issuing, processing,modifying, aggregating, redeeming, revoking, validating, distributing,or otherwise affecting or handling a coupon; accepting, rejecting,printing, processing, modifying, aggregating, canceling, validating,distributing, or otherwise affecting or handling a classifiedadvertisement; dynamically inserting an advertisement, such as andwithout limitation into an item of electronic content; an associationbetween an editor and an advertisement; permission-based advertising; apromotion; and/or commercial e-mail.

A reputation service may be employed to provide reputation informationabout an advertiser, including any of the reputation data describedabove. The reputation service may, for example, supply user feedback onorder fulfillment or billing practices of an advertiser. The reputationservice may also, or instead, provide reputation data relating to themanner in which the advertiser uses personal information, includingconformance to national or international privacy regulations, as well asreselling names or addresses to bulk mailers. The reputation service mayprovide other objective reputation data, such as whether the advertiseraccepts orders using a secure Web site or other technology. Other data,such as the advertiser's number of years in business, or other proxiesfor reliability, may also be provided in quantitative or qualitativeform. In other aspects, the reputation service may provide reputationdata for an agent or intermediary that places an advertisement for anadvertiser. This may include, for example, data on the agent's use ofcookies or other technologies that may compromise privacy or security ofclient devices, or the agent's history of placing undesirable orunwanted advertisements such as advertisements containing adult content.

The computing services 1810 may relate to recommendations. The computingservices 1810 may, without limitation, generate and/or deliver arecommendation based on one or more of the following: a buying-basedbehavior, a click-based behavior, collaborative filtering, customerreviews, editorial reviews, machine learning, and/or reputationmeasures.

In one aspect, third-party recommendation resources may themselves beanalyzed for reputation. In another aspect, individual recommendationsmay be evaluated using one or more of the reputation criteria discussedabove. This may include an evaluation of a recommended good or service,an evaluation of a recommended site or e-commerce resource, or anevaluation of an individual or entity that provides a particularrecommendation. Each of these dimensions of reputation may also becombined into an aggregated score or for a particular recommendationthat collectively evaluates reputation for the source of therecommendation and the good or service that is recommended.

The computing services 1810 may relate to metadata such as: dynamicmodification of user state, navigation, and/or navigation based uponuser history behavior. In an embodiment, reputation services may beinvoked whenever an e-commerce site seeks to modify a user state, suchas by sending or modifying a cookie, adding a site to a user's list offavorites, or initiating other changes to client-side data. In addition,reputation data may be acquired from metadata for Web sites includinginformation about sources, authors, dates, technology platforms,presence of components such as client-side scripts, and any otherinformation with the metadata for Web pages that might serve as a usefulproxy for reputation.

The computing services 1810 may relate to price including withoutlimitation generating, retrieving, storing, deducing, guessing,anticipating, and/or modifying a price in association with one or moreof the following: an agent or bot, an auction, a catalog aggregator, apricing comparison engine, a rating, and/or a reverse auction. As anexample, reputation services may be employed throughout an auctionprocess, such as by providing reputation-based services or interventionbased upon reputation data for an auction site, a seller, a bidder, oran item being auctioned, or some combination of these. Reputationservices may be employed to evaluate a catalog aggregator using, forexample, the link structure analysis and/or weighting systems describedabove. Reputation services may be employed within a price comparison Website to provide suitable warnings and other information about onlinevendors listed in a price comparison page. In other embodiments, priceinformation may itself be the subject of reputation-based services. Forexample, a vendor with a known history of selling products at differentprices than advertised, or being routinely slow in updating advertisedprices may be associated with corresponding reputation data. In otherembodiments, a vendor's prices may be compared for all products toestablish a reputation for selling goods above, below, or at marketprices. In other embodiments, a reverse auction site may be evaluatedwith respect to its tendency to deliver satisfactory goods or servicesfor a buyer-established price. In general, reputation services may beinvoked for a variety of price criteria with reference to products,vendors, catalogs, and the like.

The computing services 1810 may manage affiliations in a variety ofways, such as establishing e-commerce affiliations, managing affiliatenetworks, and/or managing relationships or payments within an affiliateprogram. Affiliations may imply a high degree of relationship amongreputation data for affiliated entities. In one aspect, analyses ofreputation data across multiple parties, such as the link structureanalysis described above, may be supplemented with affiliation data,such as by providing heavier weighting for links to known affiliates.Affiliation relationships may be derived from a number of automatedand/or manual sources, or may be inferred from known affiliationbusiness models.

The computing services 1810 may support transactions including, withoutlimitation, one or more of the following: one-click shopping, anauction, an authentication, a “buy now” operation, a shopping cartoperation, a currency transaction or exchange, a digital rightsmanagement operation, a payment, a permission, a micropayment, acryptographic key generation or distribution, an encryption, and/or anidentity or authority verification. Reputation services may be invokedin a transaction context in a number of ways. Reputation services may beused as described generally above with reference to a Web site. Anadditional set of reputation analyses, such as a more stringentevaluation or an evaluation of reputation data specific to thetransaction type, may be conducted when a transaction is initiated. Inaddition, where the transaction is supported by a third party, such asfor payment or delivery, reputation data may be provided for the thirdparty.

The computing services 1810 may implement a privacy policy. The privacypolicy may provide for actions such as blocking an advertisement,providing permanent anonymity, providing temporary anonymity, and/orpreventing or blocking spam. The privacy policy may be adjusted withreference to reputation data for a site. Thus, a Web site or companyhaving a favorable reputation for privacy and security may be accessedwithout anonymity features that might otherwise be provided pursuant tothe privacy policy. In another aspect, the reputation for a site mayinclude the site's privacy policy, such that the reputation service mayprovide notices to a user concerning same. It will be appreciated fromthe foregoing that, as used herein, the term “privacy policy” may referto a written privacy policy maintained by an entity, or acomputer-implemented privacy policy that controls operation of acomputer such as a client device. In other embodiments, the privacypolicy may be a computer-implemented, server-side policy.

The computing services 1810 may provide a Web portal, such as ane-commerce portal. The portal may also, or instead, be associated withany one or more of the services available from Yahoo!, MSN, or otherwell-known Web portals. Reputation services may be employed to providereputation data, along with messages and warnings as described generallyabove, for various third party offerings accessible through the portal.In addition, each service within the portal may have associatedreputation data. Some or all of this reputation data may be employed toprovide reputation data for the portal as a whole.

The computing services 1810 may interact with a user interface for oneor more of a media player, a Web facility, a mobile Web facility, asecure device, a skin or any other kind of user interface for acomputing device, including those described herein and in the documentsincorporated by reference herein. In certain embodiments where theinterface provides rendering of content, the reputation system may beemployed to provide guidelines for content includingage-appropriateness, source, and so on. Reputation data for content maybe employed to restrict access to certain content, or simply to provideexplicit warnings as to the nature of the content. In another aspect,reputation data may reflect digital rights management, such as byconfirming that non-public domain music is provided from a legitimatecommercial source. In another aspect, reputation services may evaluateuser interface components such as audio/video codecs or skins to ensurethat they come from a trustworthy source, and/or that they are free ofmalicious code.

More generally, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedin connection with an e-commerce system 1800 and any of its relatedcomputing services 1810 as described in connection with FIG. 20. Forexample, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be used to providereputation services through a reputation service host 112 as describedin connection with FIGS. 1-17. In embodiments, the reputation servicehost 112 may provide services such as collection of reputationinformation 116, creation of warnings, alerts, and the like 114;analysis of reputation information 122; monitoring changes 124; and/ormaking alternative recommendations 130.

In the following descriptions of figures that show generalized flowdiagrams, the direction of normal processing flow may be shown witharrows, with the flow proceeding from a logical block at an arrow tailto a logical block at the arrow's head. In the special cases where alogical block labeled END: RETURN appears, however, the direction ofnormal processing flow may be momentarily reversed; this logical blockmay indicate the return of processing flow to a preceding logical block.The textual description of each END: RETURN logical block, as disclosedhereinafter, will clearly indicate the logical block to which processingflow may return. From this return point, processing flow may proceed inthe normal direction.

Also, in the following descriptions of figures that show generalizedflow diagrams of procedures, it should be understood that the diagramsmight illustrate methodologies and structural flows for specificembodiments of the procedures. Thus, it should be appreciated thatnumerous other embodiments of the procedures may be possible, includingembodiments that may rightly be depicted using none of the logicalblocks of the diagrams described hereinafter, some of the logical blocksof the diagrams depicted hereinafter, or a combination of logical blocksnot described herein with some or all of the logical blocks of thediagrams depicted hereinafter.

FIG. 21A shows an e-commerce process. Starting at the top of the figure,a user 1802 may initiate an electronic commerce procedure (shown as theSTART logical block 2102), which is described hereinafter with referenceto FIG. 22. Subsequently, processing flow may continue to a validationand authorization procedure (shown as the VALIDATE AND AUTHORIZE logicalblock 2104), which is described hereinafter with reference to FIG. 23.This procedure 2104 may provide the user with full access, partialaccess, or no access to the services 1810 (as described in connectionwith FIG. 20).

Processing flow may proceed to logical block 2108 (labeled SELECT COMP.SERVICE), as shown, wherein a test may be made to select which one ofthe computing services 1810 (“the service”) may be provided by theelectronic commerce system 1800 to facilitate electronic commerce forthe user. This test is described hereinafter with reference to FIG. 24.As depicted, the logical blocks 2110, 2112, 2114, 2118, 2120, 2122,2124, 2128, 2130, 2132, 2134, 2138, and 2172 may be representative ofthe services 1810 by which the electronic commerce system 1800 mayfacilitate electronic commerce for the user.

Processing flow may then proceed to a logical block corresponding to aparticular service in an electronic commerce environment. The servicemay include, for example, an access procedure 2140 associated with afacilitation of a sale of a good and/or service 2110; an accessprocedure 2142 associated with a facilitation of an advertisement 2112;an access procedure 2144 associated with a facilitation of arecommendation 2114; an access procedure 2148 associated with afacilitation of metadata 2118; an access procedure 2150 associated witha facilitation of a price 2120; an access procedure 2152 associated witha facilitation of an affiliate 2132; an access procedure 2154 associatedwith a facilitation of a transaction 2124; an access procedure 2158associated with a facilitation of a schema 2128; an access procedure2160 associated with a facilitation of a privacy policy 2130; an accessprocedure 2162 associated with a facilitation of a portal 2132; anaccess procedure 2164 associated with a facilitation of a user interface2134; an access facility 2168 associated with a facilitation of acommunication of information 2138; or an access procedure 2170associated with an end of the electronic commerce procedure 2172.

Each access procedure noted above may provide an additional level ofvalidation and authorization of the user. Thus, generally, after thetest of a logical block 2108 indicates the service, the user may bevalidated and authorized for access to the service. In addition, eachvalidation or authorization procedure may cause a client device toinvoke reputation services as described herein. In this context, thereputation service may apply more stringent reputation criteria. Inanother aspect, the reputation service may check for user-providedoverrides relating to interactions with an e-commerce site or entity.Subsequently, if validated and authorized, the process may facilitatethe respective service, as illustrated in blocks 2110, 2112, 2114, 2118,2120, 2122, 2124, 2128, 2130, 2132, 2134, 2138, and 2172.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 21A. For example, an interactive reputationplatform 100 may be used to provide reputation services through areputation service host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17.The reputation service host 112 may provide its services during aninteraction associated with validating and authorizing 2104, selecting aservice 2108, and/or interacting with a service, for example. Inembodiments, the reputation service host 112 may provide servicesrelated to collection of reputation information 116; providing warnings,alerts and the like 114; providing analysis of reputation information122; monitoring changes 124; and/or making alternative recommendations130.

FIG. 21B shows an electronic commerce process. Starting at the top ofthe figure, the user may enter the start of the electronic commerceprocedure 2102, which may be within a computing process or thread 2174.Subsequently, the validation and authorization procedure 2104 may befollowed. Processing flow may then proceed to logical block 2108 andthen to the SPAWN COMPUTING SERVICE logical block 2178. This logicalblock may indicate the spawning of a computing process or thread 2180.As shown, the processing flow may proceed, perhaps in parallel, bothinto the process or thread 2180 and into the logical block 2108. Withinthe process or thread 2180, the processing flow may continue with theACCESS logical block 2182, which may represent a particular accessprocedure, which may be any of the access procedures described above.Then, as shown, the processing flow within the spawned process or thread2180 may conclude with the FACILITATION logical block 2180, in which oneof the procedures is implemented as described above with reference toFIG. 21A. At the conclusion of the processing flow within the spawnedprocess or thread 2180, the process or thread 2180 may terminate,suspend, and/or exit, with or without a status code.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 21B. For example, an interactive reputationplatform 100 may be used to provide reputation services through areputation service host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17.In embodiments, the reputation service host 112 may collect reputationinformation 116; provide warnings, alerts and the like 114; provideanalysis of reputation information 122; monitor changes 124; and/or makealternative recommendations 130, as described in greater detail above.

FIG. 22 shows an electronic commerce procedure 2102 beginning as shownin block 2202. Process flow may proceed as shown, with the user perhapsaccessing one of the remote terminals 1812 (“the remote terminal”) inlogical block 2204. The remote terminal may provide a service such as afunction or method invocation, a launch of an executable action, aninterpretation of a script or set of byte-codes, and so forth. In otheraspects, access may include physical access, such as and withoutlimitation walking up to and physically interacting with a point-of-saleterminal that may be the remote terminal. Alternatively, this access maycomprise virtual access such as and without limitation access to theremote terminal via a Web browser that may be operatively coupled to aWeb server (such as by HTTP) that may be operatively coupled with theremote terminal (such as by TCP/IP). In any case, processing flow mayproceed to logical block 2208 where the remote terminal may conduct atest to see if it needs to access a central processing facility 1902. Ifthe test results in a negative result, the remote terminal may alreadybe accessing the central processing facility 1902, and processing flowmay proceed to logical block END: OK 2210, where this may end theprocedure, perhaps producing a success code or other success indication.However, if the test results in an affirmative result, the remoteterminal may attempt to access a central processing facility 1902 suchas and without limitation by connecting to the central processingfacility 1902. In some cases this attempt may fail due to, for example,a busy signal, an excessive network lag, an unavailable network deviceor server, a software or hardware failure, a erroneously configurednetwork device or server, and so forth. In these cases, processing flowmay proceed to END: FAIL 2218, where the procedure may end, perhapsproducing a failure code or other failure indication. Otherwise, theprocedure may end at the aforementioned END: OK functional block 2210.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 22. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Inembodiments, the reputation service host 112 may collection reputationinformation 116; provide warnings, alerts and the like 114; provideanalysis of reputation information 122; monitor changes 124; and/or makealternative recommendations 130, as described in greater detail above.

FIG. 23 shows a validation/authorization process. The process 2104 maybegin with the logical block START 2302. Processing flow may continue toa test, as shown by logical block 2304 (labeled USER IS CPU?), which maydetermine if the user is an automatic computer (that is, not a human).If the user is a computer, the process may continue to logical block2308 where the central processing facility 1902 may utilize a method toauthenticate the user. This method may without limitation be acryptographic authentication method, such as the Challenge-HandshakeAuthentication Protocol. The logical flow may then proceed to logicalblock 2310 (labeled AUTHENTIC?), which may represent a test of theresult of the authentication method. Depending upon the result of thistest, processing flow may continue either to the END: CPU NO ACCESS 2312logical block or to the VALIDATE logical block 2314, as shown. Thelogical block 2312 may represent the procedure exiting with or without astatus code and with no access granted to the automatic computer. If, onthe other hand, the test at 2304 is negative, processing flow maycontinue to logical block 2318 where the central processing facility1902 may gather authentication information, such as and withoutlimitation a globally unique identifier (GUID) and password, from theuser. The authentication information may then be selected from contentsof one of the databases 1808 in logical block 2320 (labeled AUTHENTIC?).If the authentication information is associated with a table entry inone of the databases 1808, the user may be deemed authentic, the resultof the test at 2308 may be affirmative, and processing flow may continueto logical block 2314, as shown. Otherwise, the result at 2308 may benegative and the procedure may conclude at logical block 2322, END:HUMAN NO ACCESS, which may represent the procedure exiting with orwithout a status code and with no access granted to the user. At logicalblock 2314, a GUID associated with the user, which may or may not be theusername and which may be representative of a primary key in a table inone of the databases 1808, may be selected from the table. The selectionmay be tested at logical block 2324 (labeled FULL ACCESS?) to see if itindicates that the user should be granted full access to the system1800. If the result of this test is affirmative, processing flow maycontinue to logical block 2328, END: FULL ACCESS, which may representthe procedure ending with full access granted to the user, perhapsgenerating a status code representative of both the authentication ofthe user and the validation of user's full access to the system 1800.Otherwise, the selection may be tested again, this time at logical block2330 (labeled PARTIAL ACCESS?), as shown, to see if it indicates thatthe user should be granted partial access to the system 1800. If theresult at logic block 2330 is affirmative, processing flow may continueto logical block 2332, END: PARTIAL ACCESS, which may represent theprocedure ending with partial access granted to the user, perhapsgenerating a status code representative of both the authentication ofthe user and the validation of the user's partial access to the system1800. Finally, as shown, if the result at logic block 2330 is negative,processing may continue to the aforementioned END: NO HUMAN ACCESSlogical block 2322.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 23. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Forexample, personal or otherwise sensitive information may be requestedduring the authentication and validate procedures, and the reputationservice host 112 may provide warnings and the like in connection withany such requests. Likewise, a reputation service may provide no warningif the interaction or the entity has a favorable reputation, or if auser has overridden reputation warnings for the related site or service.In other aspects, once a user is authenticated, the resource may provideadditional information that may be used by the reputation service. Inembodiments, the reputation service host 112 may provide servicesrelated to collection of reputation information 116, providing warnings,alerts, and the like 114; providing analysis of reputation information122; monitoring changes 124; and/or making alternative recommendations130.

FIG. 24 shows a process for selecting a computing service. The procedurefor this selection, which may represent the SELECT COMP. SERVICEprocedure at the aforementioned logical block 2108, may begin at theSTART logical block 2402. Proceeding to the SELECT SERVICE logical block2404, a service selection may be received by the system 1800 from theuser. Then, as shown by logical block 2408, the selection may becompared to the access already granted to the user, and the result ofthis comparison may be tested to see if it is a match. If the testresult is negative, the procedure flow may return to logical block 2404.Otherwise, the service may have been successfully selected, and theprocedure may end, perhaps generating a code or indicationrepresentative of the selection, as shown by the END logical block 2410.By using this process, restricted access may be provided to a subset ofservices available at an e-commerce site, according to permissionsassociated with a particular user.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 24. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Forexample, the reputation service host 112 may provide warnings and thelike or otherwise monitor the interaction when the selection of theservice is being made. The reputation service interaction may takeplace, for example, when the opportunity to interact is presented, asthe interaction is attempted, or following the interaction. Inembodiments, the reputation service host 112 may provide servicesrelated to collection of reputation information 116, providing warnings,alerts, and the like 114; providing analysis of reputation information122; monitoring changes 124; and/or making alternative recommendations130.

Referring to FIG. 25, a procedure for providing an end of electroniccommerce access service, which may be represented by the aforementionedACCESS: END SESSION logical block 2170, may begin with the START logicalblock 2502. Next, a test may be performed to determine if the user is aCPU, as shown by logical block 2504. An affirmative outcome in 2504 maydirect the processing flow to the END: ACCESS GRANTED logical block2508, which may represent the procedure ending with access to theservice represented by the END logical block 2172 granted to the user,perhaps as signaled by a code or indication representative of the user'sgranted access. A negative outcome in 2504 may direct the procedure flowto END: RETURN 2512, from which procedure flow may return to the STARTlogical block 2402 of FIG. 24.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 21B. For example, an interactive reputationplatform 100 may be used to provide reputation services through areputation service host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17.In embodiments, the reputation service host 112 may provide servicesrelated to collection of reputation information 116, providing warnings,alerts, and the like 114; providing analysis of reputation information122; monitoring changes 124; and/or making alternative recommendations130. At the conclusion of an e-commerce interaction, the reputationservice may explicitly request user feedback on one or more aspects ofthe interaction for use in subsequent reputation analysis.

Referring to FIG. 26, the user may be granted or denied access to one ofthe computing services 1810. Proceeding from the START logical block2602 at top of the figure, the system 1800 may receive the user'scredentials, as shown by logical block 2604. The user's credentials may,without limitation, include a GUID, password, MAC address, public key,digital certificate, access token, biometric measurement, and so forth.Then, in logical block 2608, the system 1800 may connect to one of thedatabases 1808. Next, a test may compare the user's credentials to thecontents of the database, as shown by logical block 2610. If there isn'ta match, the user may be denied access to the computing service 1810,and processing flow may continue to logical block 2612, END: RETURN,from which the processing flow may return to logical block 2402 of FIG.24. Otherwise, the user may be granted access to one of the computingservices 1810, and processing flow may continue to logical block 2614,where this procedure ends, perhaps producing a success code or othersuccess indication.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 26. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Forexample, the reputation service host 112 may provide its service inassociation with the submission of user credentials 2604. The reputationservice host may warn of potential threats, dangers, and the likeassociated with making such submission. In embodiments, the reputationservice host 112 may provide services related to collection ofreputation information 116, providing warnings, alerts, and the like114; providing analysis of reputation information 122; monitoringchanges 124; and/or making alternative recommendations 130.

FIG. 27 shows a termination of an electronic commerce service. Beginningwith the START 2702 logical block, processing flow may continue tological block 2704, REVOKE VALIDATION/AUTHORIZATION, where thevalidation and authorization of the user, as described hereinbefore withreference to FIG. 23, may be revoked. This revocation may, withoutlimitation, include updating an entry in one of the databases 1808;adding a serial number associated with the validation and/orauthorization to a certificate revocation list; and/or terminating theuser's access to the system 1800 at the remote terminal, such as andwithout limitation by logging out the user. Processing flow may continueas shown to logical block 2708 (labeled HALT ACCESS?) where a test maybe conducted to determine if the remote terminal should halt access tocentral processing facility 1902, such as and without limitation bydisconnecting from the central processing facility 1902. If the resultof this test is affirmative, processing flow may continue to logicalblock 2710, HALT ACCESS, where the access may be halted. Then,processing flow may continue to logical block 2712, END: HALT, where theentire electronic commerce procedure may either halt or restart fromlogical block START 2102, which is described hereinabove with referenceto FIG. 21A. If the result of the test in logical block 2708 isnegative, processing flow may continue to logical block 2712, asdescribed above.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 27. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Forexample, a reputation service host may collect information through acollection facility 116 relating to the revocation. This information mayalso be transmitted to a reputation server 110 as described inconnection with FIG. 1, and the information may be used to access thereputation of such service. In embodiments, the reputation service host112 may provide services related to collection of reputation information116, providing warnings, alerts, and the like 114; providing analysis ofreputation information 122; monitoring changes 124; and/or makingalternative recommendations 130.

The system 1800 may provide the user with a service that may facilitatethe sale of a good and/or service. This service may be represented bythe FACILITATION OF SALE OF GOOD/SERVICE logical block 2110 of FIG. 21Aand may be described in detail hereinafter with reference to FIG. 28.Prior to accessing this service, the user may be required to gain accessto this service by following the access procedure that may berepresented by the ACCESS: SALE OF GOOD/SERVICE logical block 2140 ofFIG. 21A, which may be described hereinbefore with reference to FIG. 26.

Referring to FIG. 28, the FACILITATION OF SALE OF GOOD/SERVICE service2110 may be provided according to the depicted procedure. The good orservice may be any of the goods and services described herein. Beginningwith the START logical block 2802, processing flow may continue to atest, represented as logical block 2804 (labeled SUFFICIENT STOCK?),which may determine whether there exists sufficient stock of goodsand/or resources for delivery of goods and/or performance of services tofulfill the proposed order. If the test result is negative, processingflow may proceed to the ERROR MESSAGE logical block 2808, which mayresult in the delivery of an error code or message, which maycommunicate the insufficient levels of stock and/or resources. This codeor message may be delivered to an administrator, which may be one of theoperators or may be an administrative automatic computer system. Thisadministrator may manage inventory and resource levels and/or tracksales that were not completed due to the lack of inventory and/orresources. When checking sufficient stock of goods and/or resources forperformance of services, the system may check sources other thanin-house inventory and resources. It may be possible to purchase goodsor commission resources from elsewhere and execute a profitabletransaction. However, if the result of the test at logical block 2804 isaffirmative, processing flow may proceed to the logical block 2810(labeled SUFFICIENT FUNDS?).

Logical block 2810 may represent another test, which may determine ifthe potential purchaser, which may be the user, has sufficient finds tocomplete the transaction. The system may check the potential purchaser'scredit card for authorization and may check the potential purchaser'sbank balance, credit rating, or balance with any online transactionbrokering services, such as PayPal. If the test result is negative,processing flow may proceed to the ERROR MESSAGE logical block 2808,which may result in the display of an error message communicating thelack of funds or insufficient credit rating. The error message may alsorecommend or present ways in which the potential purchaser can remedythe error, such as by requesting a credit increase or reviewing his orher credit history for errors. The error message may also refer thepotential purchaser to other retailers willing to sell to potentialpurchasers with lower credit ratings. The first retailer may receive afee or commission from the second retailer for this type of referral.The system may facilitate tracking and processing of these referrals.However, if the result of the test at logical block 2810 is affirmative,processing flow may proceed to the DELIVERY ESTIMATE logical block 2812.

Logical block 2812 may represent the process by which the systemestimates delivery of the good or performance of the service. For aservice the estimate may include a starting date and/or time and anending date and/or time. The delivery estimate may involve the selectionof a delivery method for a good or a priority level for a service. Thedifferent delivery methods and priority levels may be associated withdifferent prices. The delivery estimate may also take into accountpre-orders for items and services that have not yet been released to thepublic. The delivery estimate may comprise a transfer time for anelectronic delivery. The delivery estimate may also include a returndate or due date for an item that must be returned, such as a movie orgame rental. The processing flow may then proceed to the RECOMMENDGOODS/SERVICES logical block 2814. This logical block 2814 may representthe process by which the system recommends related goods and/orservices, such as accessories, updates, update subscriptions,warranties, complementary goods, or training services. Therecommendation may be based on the good and/or service purchased in thecurrent transaction and/or may be based on goods and/or servicespurchased by the potential purchaser in the past. The potentialpurchaser may select additional goods and/or services for purchase.Subsequently, the process of recommending related goods and/or servicesmight repeat. The system may also allow the potential purchaser to placegoods and/or services on a “wish list” for purchase in the future. Theprocess flow may then continue to the FINALIZE TRANSACTION logical block2818. The potential purchaser and the system may commit to thetransaction at this stage, which may involve writing data to one of thedatabases 1808. The process flow may then proceed to the NOTIFICATIONSlogical block 2820. This logical block 2820 may represent thenotification of other related systems of the transaction. For example,the administrator or an inventory control system may be notified thatthe stock of a certain good has decreased. If the good requires specialshipping, a notification may be sent to a shipping department allowingadvance preparation for shipment of the good. A confirmation of thetransaction may be transmitted to a purchaser, who may have been thepotential purchaser. The processing flow may then continue to logicalblock 2822, END: TRANSACTION COMPLETED, where the procedure may end,perhaps producing a code or other indication of completion of thetransaction.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 28. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Forexample, the reputation service host 112 may collect information througha collection facility 116 related to the sufficient stock 2804. Suchinformation may assist in the overall rating of the supplier, and theinformation may be fed into an analysis facility 122 to make theassessment. As another example of providing a reputation service inconnection with the process described in connection with FIG. 28, thereputation service host 112 may generate a warning or the like inconnection with the collection of information relating to the inquiry offunds 2810. In embodiments, the reputation service host 112 may provideservices related to collection of reputation information 116, providingwarnings, alerts, and the like 114; providing analysis of reputationinformation 122; monitoring changes 124; and/or making alternativerecommendations 130.

The system 1800 may provide the user with a facilitation of advertisingservice. This service may be represented by the FACILITATION OF ADVERT.logical block 2112 of FIG. 21A and may be described in detailhereinafter with references to FIGS. 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, and 34. Priorto accessing this service, the user may be required to gain access tothis service by following the access procedure that may be representedby the ACCESS: ADVERT logical block 2142 of FIG. 21A, which may bedescribed hereinbefore with reference to FIG. 26.

Referring to FIG. 29, the advertising service may include a procedurefor aggregating advertisements. Beginning with the START logical block2902, where an advertisement may be provided to the procedure,processing flow may proceed to the DEFINE CRITERIA logical block 2904.At this stage a criterion that may generally be associated withadvertisements may be specified or defined. The criterion may pertain tocontent of the desired advertisements; delivery media of the desiredadvertisements; target demographics of the desired advertisements; costof delivery of the desired advertisements; effectiveness of the desiredadvertisements; and so forth. In one embodiment, the system 1800 couldinclude and/or the user may provide an advertising search engine, inwhich case a search string provided to the search engine may define thecriterion. In another embodiment, the criterion may relate to a pastbehavior associated with one or more of the users 1802, such as andwithout limitation purchasing behavior, Web surfing behavior, and soforth.

Once the criterion is defined, the processing flow may then continue toa test, represented as logical block 2908 (labeled AD MEETS CRITERIA?),which may determine whether or not the advertisement meets the specifiedcriterion. This test may include a comparison of the criterion toinformation that may be stored in one of the databases 1808 and/orassociated with the advertisement. This information may, withoutlimitation, include a description of the content of the advertisement,an MPAA rating, an ESRB rating, a geographic location, a price, adisplay size, a display format, a rendering capability, an activationtime or date, a deactivation time or date, and so forth. If theadvertisement does not meet the criterion it may be discarded asdepicted by logical block 2910. However, if the advertisement does meetthe defined criterion the process flow may proceed to the AGGREGATElogical block 2912. The AGGREGATE logical block 2912 may represent theaggregation of the advertisement with other advertisements that may ormay not meet the criterion. Moreover, the advertisements contained inthe aggregation may be prioritized, filtered, and/or sorted at thisstage. The process flow may then proceed to the PRESENT ADS logicalblock 2914. This may represent the presentation of the advertisements tothe user, to a subset of the users 1802 (such as and without limitationthe users 1802 associated with a particular demographic), to all of theusers 1802, and/or to the general public. The advertisements may bedisplayed in a way consistent with the prioritization, filtering, and/orsorting of the advertisements. This display of advertisements may beembodied as a Web site, which may contain only advertisements and whichmay be created via a manual and/or automatic process. In any case, theprocessing flow may then continue to logical block 2918 END, where theprocedure may end, perhaps producing a code or other indication ofcompletion of the procedure.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 29. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Forexample, the definition of the criteria step 2904 may involve thesubmission of information, and the reputation of the interaction may beassessed or indicated by the reputation service host 112. Additionally,the advertisement may be affiliated with a site or organization with apoor reputation, so the reputation service host 112 may indicate this toa user, such as by providing a visual cue within an interface thatrenders the advertisement, or intervening with a warning message if auser navigates to the advertisement. In embodiments, the reputationservice host 112 may provide services related to collection ofreputation information 116, providing warnings, alerts, and the like114; providing analysis of reputation information 122; monitoringchanges 124; and/or making alternative recommendations 130.

Referring to FIG. 30, the advertising service may include attentionbrokering such as buying and selling the attention of consumers.Beginning with the START logical block 3002, processing flow may proceedto the PROMPT logical block 3004. At this stage a user may be promptedto view an advertisement. Certain information about the advertisementmay also be presented. The process flow may then proceed to a test,represented by logical block 3008 (labeled ACCEPT?), which may determinewhether the user accepts presentation of the advertisement. If theresult of this test is negative, the process flow may proceed to theREASON logical block 3010. At this step the user may provide a reasonfor declining presentation of the advertisement. The user may, forexample, select from among several answer choices or enter his or herown choice. These reasons may then be presented to an administrator orthe advertisers and used to alter the process or advertisement contentso that the user is more likely to accept presentation of a futureadvertisement. However, if the result of the test at 3008 isaffirmative, the processing flow may proceed to logical block 3012,which may represent the presentation of the advertisement to the user.The process flow may then proceed to the PAYMENT logical block 3014.This logical block 3014 may represent one or more payments to the userviewing the advertisement, or to an attention broker that placed theadvertisement, or to a firm that created the advertisement, or somecombination of these. There may also be one or more payments to otherparties involved in the attention brokering process, such as a systemadministrator or Web site operator. Whether proceeding from 3010 or3018, the processing flow may continue to logical block 3018 END, wherethe procedure may end, perhaps producing a code, payment record, and/orother indication of completion of the procedure.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 30. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Forexample, the user may decline the advertisement based on informationprovided by the reputation service host 112. In another aspect, thereason for declining an add may be gathered by the reputation servicefor use in reputation analysis. In another aspect, reputation data forthe third parties involved in an attention brokering process (adcreator, ad sponsor, broker, etc.) may be employed to block certainadvertisements, or to provide reputation-based warning messages to auser. In embodiments, the reputation service host 112 may provideservices related to collection of reputation information 116, providingwarnings, alerts, and the like 114; providing analysis of reputationinformation 122; monitoring changes 124; and/or making alternativerecommendations 130.

Referring to FIG. 31, the advertising service may include bidding toadvertise, which may involve consumers being presented withadvertisements from the highest bidding advertiser. Beginning with theSTART logical block 3102, processing flow may proceed to theCHARACTERIZE VIEW logical block 3104. The system 1800 may characterizethe type of consumer or consumers who will view the advertisement. Theprocess flow may then proceed to the CHECK BIDS logical block 3108,where bids associated with advertisements and placed by advertisers maybe compared to determine a winning bid. The bids may be based upontarget demographics; marketing objectives such as reach, recall, andnumber of impressions; pricing; and so forth. Once a winning bid isdetermined, the process flow may then proceed to the PRESENT AD OFSELECTED BIDDER 3110 logical block. Here, the system may present theadvertisement associated with the winning bid to the user and/or one ormore consumers, which may also be users 1802. In this way the system mayfill orders for presentation of advertisements in connection with bids.The processing flow may then continue to logical block 3112 END, wherethe procedure may end, perhaps producing a code, presentation record tobe used for billing purposes, or other indication of completion of theprocedure.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 31. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Forexample, sponsored links and other results of a bidding advertisementmay be provided to a user, and a reputation service host 112 may providewarnings and the like associated with the sponsored content. Inembodiments, the sponsored link may be presented along with anindication of reputation to alert the user of which sponsored content isacceptable from a reputation standpoint. In other embodiments, poorreputation sponsored content may not be provided to the user. It may befiltered or otherwise removed by the reputation service host 112. Inembodiments, the reputation service host 112 may provide servicesrelated to collection of reputation information 116, providing warnings,alerts, and the like 114; providing analysis of reputation information122; monitoring changes 124; and/or making alternative recommendations130.

Referring to FIG. 32, the advertising service may include themanipulation of a classified advertisement or coupon. Beginning with theSTART logical block 3202, processing flow may proceed to theCHARACTERIZE CLASSIFIED AD OR COUPON logical block 3204. The logicalblock 3204 may represent an action of characterizing the classifiedadvertisement or coupon. Relevant characteristics may include source,expiration, price, and type of good and/or service, and so forth. Theprocess flow may then continue to a test, represented as logical block3208 (labeled MANIPULATE?), which may determine whether the classifiedadvertisement or coupon should be manipulated. If the test result isnegative, the process flow may proceed to the logical block ORIGINAL ADOR COUPON 3210 and the classified advertisement or coupon may not bemanipulated. If the test result is affirmative, however, then the systemmay manipulate the classified advertisement or coupon, as may berepresented by the MANIPULATED CLASSIFIED AD OR COUPON logical block3212. Coupon manipulation may involve the issuing, processing,modifying, aggregating, redeeming, revoking, validating, distributing,or otherwise affecting or handling of the coupon. Manipulation of aclassified advertisement may include the printing, processing,modifying, aggregating, canceling, validating, distributing, orotherwise affecting or handling of the classified advertisement. Theprocessing flow may then continue to logical block 3214 END, where theprocedure may end, perhaps producing a code, record, or other indicationof completion of the procedure.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 32. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Forexample, the reputation service host 112 may present informationrelating to the reputation of the coupon or classified ad issuer oraffiliated site information. As an additional example, a user may bepresented with warnings or other indicators prior to manipulating orissuing the classified ad or coupon. In embodiments, the reputationservice host 112 may provide services related to collection ofreputation information 116, providing warnings, alerts, and the like114; providing analysis of reputation information 122; monitoringchanges 124; and/or making alternative recommendations 130.

Referring to FIG. 33, the advertising service may include the dynamicinsertion of an advertisement into other content. Beginning with theSTART logical block 3302, processing flow may proceed to theCHARACTERIZE AD logical block 3308, which may represent an action ofcharacterizing the advertisement. Characteristics of the advertisementmay include the type of good and/or service offered for sale, thepricing structure, a target geographic region, a target demographic, andso forth. The process flow may then proceed to the CHARACTERIZE CONTENTlogical block 3308, which may involve the characterization of the othercontent. The other content may be electronic content, perhaps includingaudio, video, text, and so forth. Characteristics of the content mayinclude target age, running time, target geographic region, targetdemographic, and so forth. The process flow may then continue to a test,which may be represented as logical block 3310 (labeled CHARACTERIZECONTENT?). The test may determine the degree of similarity orcompatibility between the advertisement and the other content. If thedegree of similarity or compatibility is below a certain threshold, thetest result may be negative. If the degree of similarity orcompatibility is above or equal to a certain threshold, the test resultmay be affirmative. For example, the electronic content andadvertisement may be targeted to consumers of a similar age in a similargeographic region. In another example, the editor or publisher of theadvertisement and the content may be the same, leading to an affirmativetest result. Given the affirmative test result, the process flow mayproceed to the INTEGRATE logical block 3312. This logical block 3312 mayrepresent the integration of the advertisement into the other content.The system may optimize the location and manner of integration of theadvertisement based on the characterization of the advertisement, thecharacterization of the other content, or other factors. Whether due toa negative result at 3310 or due to normal processing flow from 3312,the processing flow may continue to logical block 3314 END, where theprocedure may end, perhaps producing a code, record, or other indicationof completion of the procedure.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 33. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Forexample, a reputation service host 112 may be used in connection withthe characterization step 3304 to assist in the determination of anacceptable advertisement. The advertisement may not be acceptable if thereputation service host indicates the reputation of the advertisement oradvertisement provider is of poor reputation. In embodiments, thereputation of the advertisement or advertisement provider may be afactor in the overall decision relating to the advertisementincorporation. In embodiments, when the advertisement or provider has apoor reputation, a reputation service host 112 may providerecommendations for other advertisements for inclusion. In embodiments,the reputation service host 112 may provide services related tocollection of reputation information 116, providing warnings, alerts,and the like 114; providing analysis of reputation information 122;monitoring changes 124; and/or making alternative recommendations 130.

Referring to FIG. 34, the advertising service may includepermission-based advertising. Beginning with the START logical block3402, processing flow may proceed to the SELECT AD logical block 3404,which may represent a selection of an advertisement to be transmitted orpresented to a recipient, which may be the user or some other consumer.The process flow may then proceed to the SELECT POTENTIAL RECIPIENT 3408logical block, which may involve selection of the recipient. The processflow may then continue to a test, which may be represented as logicalblock 3410 (labeled PERMISSION?). This test may determine whether anadvertiser associated with the advertisement has permission to transmitthe advertisement to the recipient. The permission may depend upon theadvertisement's type and/or a transmission method's type, where thetransmission method may be used to transmit the advertisement. Forexample, the advertiser may have permission to transmit theadvertisement to the recipient only when the advertisement relates toelectronics and the advertisement is transmitted via e-mail. It followsthat, if the result of the test at 3410 is negative, the advertisementmay not be sent, and processing flow may proceed to the END logicalblock 3414. However, if the test result is affirmative, the process flowmay proceed to the SUPPLY AD logical block 3412, which may representtransmitting the advertisement to the recipient. The advertisement maybe transmitted over the Internet, via email, via fax, via instantmessenger, via VoIP, via telephone, as video, as audio, as text, or byany other delivery or presentation method. The processing flow may thencontinue to logical block 3414 END, where the procedure may end, perhapsproducing a code, record, or other indication of completion of theprocedure.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 34. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Forexample, the reputation service host 112 may provide warnings or othersuch services in connection with a user receiving such advertisements.In embodiments, the reputation service host 112 may provide servicesrelated to collection of reputation information 116, providing warnings,alerts, and the like 114; providing analysis of reputation information122; monitoring changes 124; and/or making alternative recommendations130.

The system 1800 may facilitate many other advertising services. Prior toaccessing these other advertising services 2112, the user may berequired to gain access to the services by following the ACCESS: ADVERTprocedure 2142. The advertising service may support direct communicationbetween an advertiser and one of the users or direct communicationbetween one or more users. The advertising service may also, or instead,provide a promotion. The advertising service may also, or instead, be acommercial e-mail service. Any of the abovementioned advertisingprocedures may apply to the commercial e-mail service.

The system 1800 may provide the user with a facilitation ofrecommendation service. This service may be represented by theFACILITATION OF RECOMMEND logical block 2114 of FIG. 21A. One embodimentis described in greater detail with reference to FIG. 35 below. Prior toaccessing this service, the user may be required to gain access to theservice by following the access procedure that may be represented by theACCESS: RECOMMEND logical block 2144 of FIG. 21A, which may be describedhereinbefore with reference to FIG. 26.

Referring to FIG. 35, the facilitation of recommendation service may beprovided according to the depicted procedure. The service may involvethe provision, generation, and/or delivery of a recommendation based onor associated with one or more of a buying-based behavior, a click-basedbehavior, collaborative filtering, customer reviews, editorial reviews,machine learning, reputation measures, and so forth. Beginning with theSTART logical block 3502, the process flow may proceed to the DETERMINECRITERIA logical block 3504, which may represent determining a criterionrelevant to the provision, generation, and/or delivery of therecommendation. The criterion may relate to the recommendation and/or toa potential recipient of the recommendation. The process flow may thenproceed to the ASSESS CRITERIA logical block 3508, which may representan assessment of the criterion determined in the DETERMINE CRITERIAlogical block 3504. As an example, the relevant criterion may be abuying-based behavior, a click-based behavior, a customer review, areputation rating, and so forth. The assessment of a buying-basedbehavior criterion may be that the potential recipient of therecommendation has purchased three items of a certain type in the lastfour months. The assessment of a customer review may be expressed as anumber of stars on a five-star scale that an item may have received in acustomer review. The processing flow may continue to a test, representedas logical block 3510 (labeled RELEVANCE?), which may determine whetherthe recommendation is relevant to the potential recipient of therecommendation. If the test result is affirmative, processing flow maycontinue to the PRESENT RECOMMENDATION logical block 3512, where therecommendation may be generated, provided, and/or delivered to thepotential recipient. For example, the recommendation may be a favorablerecommendation related to an accessory for a product purchased by therecipient of the recommendation in the last three months. Then, theprocessing flow may continue to the END logical block 3514. However, ifthe test result is negative, the recommendation may not be presented andprocessing flow may continue to logical block 3514 END, where theprocedure may end, perhaps producing a code, record, or other indicationof completion of the procedure.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 35. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Forexample, the recommendation process may be associated with a collectionfacility 116. In embodiments, the reputation service host 112 mayprovide services related to collection of reputation information 116,providing warnings, alerts, and the like 114; providing analysis ofreputation information 122; monitoring changes 124; and/or makingalternative recommendations 130. The reputation service may evaluateparticular recommendations, or sources thereof, and providereputation-based feedback concurrently with recommendations that arereceived by a user. This may include, for example, a reputation-basedanalysis of a source of the recommendation.

The system 1800 may provide the user with a facilitation of metadataservice. This service may be represented by the FACILITATION OF METDATAlogical block 2118, described in greater detail with reference to FIG.36 below. Prior to accessing this service, the user may be required togain access to this service by following the access procedure that maybe represented by the ACCESS: METADATA logical block 2148.

Referring to FIG. 36, the FACILITATION OF METADATA service 2118 may beprovided according to the depicted procedure. The service may involvethe dynamic modification of user state, navigation, and/or navigationbased upon behavior. Beginning with the START logical block 3602, theprocess flow may proceed to the IDENTIFY DATA logical block 3604, whichmay represent the identification of a certain datum of interest. Thedatum may relate to a user, an item, a company, or other data. Theprocess flow may then proceed to the IDENTIFY METADATA logical block3608, which may represent identifying the metadata of interestassociated with the data. For example, the metadata associated with auser may include the passwords, ratings, favorite Web site, accountinformation, shipping and billing addresses of the user, and so forth.

The processing flow may continue to a test, which may be represented aslogical block 3610 (labeled MODIFY METADATA?), which may determinewhether the metadata associated with the data should be modified. If thetest result is affirmative, the metadata may be modified. For example, auser may have a new shipping address. The shipping address may be storedas metadata and may be updated as new information. The processing flowmay then proceed to the MODIFIED METADATA logical block 3612, which mayrepresent the modified metadata. If the test result is negative, themetadata may not be modified. This may be the case if the user does nothave the security or access level required for modification of therelevant metadata. The processing flow may then continue to logicalblock 3614 END, where the procedure may end, perhaps producing a code,record, and/or other indication of completion of the procedure.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 36. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Forexample, while the metadata associated with the transaction may beidentified, such identification may be monitored through a reputationservice host 112. In other embodiments, the reputation service host mayprevent the collection of the metadata until such time the reputation ofthe requester is verified. In embodiments, the user of a client 102 maybe alerted to the fact that metadata is being requested, and thereputation of the requestor may be presented to the user. The metadatamay also include information that is used by the reputation service,such as in evaluating user preferences or evaluating the reliability ofa user in providing feedback to the reputation system. In embodiments,the reputation service host 112 may provide services related tocollection of reputation information 116, providing warnings, alerts,and the like 114; providing analysis of reputation information 122;monitoring changes 124; and/or making alternative recommendations 130.

The system 1800 may provide the user with a facilitation of priceservice. This service may be represented by the FACILITATION OF PRICElogical block 2120. Prior to accessing this service, the user may berequired to gain access to this service by following the accessprocedure that may be represented by the ACCESS: PRICE logical block2150.

Referring to FIG. 37, the facilitation of price service may be providedaccording to the depicted procedure. Beginning with the START logicalblock 3702, the process flow may proceed to the IDENTIFY PRICE logicalblock 3704, which may represent identifying a certain price of interest.The price may relate to a good and/or service of interest. Theprocessing flow may then proceed to the DETERMINE FACTOR logical block3708, which may represent determining a factor. The factor may be anagent or bot, an auction, a catalog aggregator, a pricing comparisonengine, a rating, and/or a reverse auction. The processing flow maycontinue to a test, which may be represented as logical block 3710(labeled MODIFY PRICE?), which may determine whether the price should bemodified based on the factor. The manipulation may include generating,retrieving, storing, deducing, guessing, anticipating, and/or modifyingthe price. If the test result is affirmative, processing flow maycontinue first to the MODIFIED PRICE logical block 3712, where the pricemay be modified, and then to the END logical block 3714, as shown.However, if the test result is negative, processing flow may continue tothe END logical block 3714, where the procedure may end, perhapsproducing a code, a record, and/or other indication of completion of theprocedure. For example, the price may be the price of a certain computermonitor offered for sale by the user, and the factor may be a pricecomparison engine. The comparison engine may locate the prices at whichcompetitors of the user are offering the same monitor. An aspect of thesystem 1800, such as the central processing facility 1902 and/or anautomatic computer that may be one of the user's 1802, may be programmedto maintain the lowest price on the market for the monitor. If any ofthe competitors' prices are lower than the user's price, the test resultmay be affirmative and, therefore, the processing flow may proceed tothe MODIFIED PRICE logical block 3712, which may represent this aspectof the system reducing the price.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 37. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Forexample, competitor pricing may be provided in association with areputation service. The reputation service may provide an indication ofthe competitor's reputation. The reputation may relate to computersecurity; however, in embodiments, the reputation may relate to thecompetitor's services, such as delivery, customer service performance,and the like. In embodiments, the reputation service host 112 mayprovide services related to collection of reputation information 116,providing warnings, alerts, and the like 114; providing analysis ofreputation information 122; monitoring changes 124; and/or makingalternative recommendations 130.

The system 1800 may provide the user with a FACILITATION OFCOMMUNICATION OF INFORMATION service 2138, which is describedhereinafter with reference to FIG. 38. Prior to accessing this service2138, the user may be required to gain access to the service byfollowing the ACCESS: COMMUNICATION OF INFORMATION procedure 2168, whichmay be described hereinbefore with reference to FIG. 26.

Referring to FIG. 38, the FACILITATION OF COMMUNICATION OF INFORMATIONservice may be provided according to the depicted procedure. Beginningwith the START logical block 3802, processing flow may continue to atest, represented as logical block 3804 (labeled DATA TO SEND?), whichmay determine whether there exist data (“the existing data”) to sendfrom the remote terminal 1812 to the central processing facility 1902.If the test result is affirmative, processing flow may proceed to theSEND DATA logical block 3808, where the existing data may be transmittedfrom the remote terminal 1812 to the central processing facility 1902.Next, processing flow may continue to another test, which may berepresented as logical block 3810 (labeled DATA TO RECEIVE?), which maydetermine whether there exist data to receive from the centralprocessing facility 1902 at the remote terminal 1812. Similarly, if thetest result at 3804 is negative, processing flow may proceed to 3810. Inany case, if the test result at 3810 is affirmative, processing flow maycontinue to the RECEIVE DATA logical block 3812. Otherwise, processingflow may continue to a test at logical block 3814 (labeled MORE TOSEND/RECEIVE?). The RECEIVE DATA logical block 3812 may represent thetransmission of data from the central processing facility 1902 and thesubsequent reception of the data at the remote terminal 1812. The testat logical block 3814 may determine whether there are more data to besent and/or received by the central processing facility 1902 and/or theremote terminal 1812. If the result of this test is affirmative,processing flow may proceed as shown, reentering the logical block 3804.Otherwise, the processing flow may continue to logical block 3818 END,where the procedure may end, perhaps producing a code or otherindication associated with the transmission and/or reception of data.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 38. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Forexample, in embodiments, no data may be received at step 3810 unlessverified through a reputation service host 112. In embodiments, thereputation service host 112 may provide services related to collectionof reputation information 116, providing warnings, alerts, and the like114; providing analysis of reputation information 122; monitoringchanges 124; and/or making alternative recommendations 130.

FIG. 39 shows a FACILITATION OF USER INTERFACE service 2134. Starting atthe step 3902, processing flow may proceed to a FUNCTION SELECTIONlogical block 3904, where an appropriate user interface function may beselected. This function selection may be determined based upon apreference, which may be specified by the user, may be implied by a typeof the remote terminal 1812 (such as and without limitation: mediaplayer, mobile Web facility, Web facility, or secure device), and/or maybe stored in one of the databases 1808. Once a user interface functionis selected, processing flow may proceed to the selected function, whichmay be represented as one of the logical blocks 3908, 3910, 3912, 3914,and 3918. Generally, these functions may provide a user interface, whichmay be displayed on the remote terminal and with which the user mayinteract with other computing services 1810. For example, a MEDIA PLAYER3908 may represent a function that enables an audio, video, or otherrich media interface. This enablement may without limitation comprisethe provision of data in one or more of the following formats:Macromedia Flash, Windows WMV, Apple QuickTime, MPEG-3, MPEG-4, WAV,Java JAR file, Windows native executable, Macintosh native executable,and so forth. The MOBILE WEB FACILITY 3910 may represent a function thatenables a mobile Web interface, such as may be embodied by a cell phone,a PDA, and so forth. This enablement may without limitation comprise theprovision of data in one or more of the following formats: SMS, XML,HTML, XHTML, and so forth. The WEB FACILITY 3912 may represent afunction that enables a Web interface, such as may be embodied by a Webbrowser. This enablement may without limitation comprise the provisionof data in one or more of the following formats: XML, XHTML, HTML, andso forth. The SECURE DEVICE 3914 may represent a function that enablesan interface on a secure device, such as may be embodied by a remoteterminal 1812 connected to the central processing facility 1902 via asecure protocol such as SSH, SSL, IPSec, and so forth. This enablementmay without limitation comprise the provision of data encryptedaccording to one or more of the following algorithms: 3-Way, Blowfish,CAST, CMEA, DES, Triple-DES, DEAL, FEAL, GOST, IDEA, LOKI, Lucifer,MacGuffin, MARS, MISTY, MMB, NewDES, RC2, RC4, RC5, RC6, REDOC,Rijndael, Safer, Serpent, SQUARE, Skipjack, TEA, Twofish, ORYX, and/orSEAL. As shown, unless the END USER INTERFACE SERVICE function(represented by logical block 3918) is selected, processing flow mayreturn to the FUNCTION SELECTION logical block 3904. Logical block 3918may represent the end of this procedure and, perhaps, may represent theproduction of a success code, an exit code, or some other indication ofprocess termination.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 21B. For example, an interactive reputationplatform 100 may be used to provide reputation services through areputation service host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17.For example, interactions with data using a selected function may bemonitored by a reputation service host 112. In embodiments, thereputation service host 112 may provide services related to collectionof reputation information 116, providing warnings, alerts, and the like114; providing analysis of reputation information 122; monitoringchanges 124; and/or making alternative recommendations 130.

FIG. 40 shows a FACILITATON OF A PORTAL service 2132. The procedure maybegin at the START logical block 4002 and may proceed to the CONNECT TODATABASE logical block 4004. In step 4004, a central processing facility1902 may connect to one of the databases 1808 (which may be referred toin this paragraph as “the database”). Processing flow may continue tological block 4008 where links to other resources, which may withoutlimitation be embodied as URLs or URIs, may be selected from thedatabase. The other resources may relate to subject matter associatedwith an object of electronic commerce. For example and withoutlimitation, the object of electronic commerce may be common stock, andthe related subject matter may without limitation comprise news withpotential impact on the value of the common stock, real-time quotes,historical data, stock market averages, and so forth. The otherresources may also be the services 1810. After selecting the links, aWeb page comprising the links may be created at logical block 4012. ThisWeb page may then be presented to the user, as may be shown by thePRESENT WEB PAGE TO USER logical block 4014. The user may select a linkwithin the Web page, which may be received by the system 1800 as userinput, as may be shown by the RECEIVE USER INPUT logical block 4010.Processing flow may then continue to a test in logical block 4018, whichmay determine whether the user input is indicative of the user's desireto leave the portal. If so, processing flow may proceed to the ENDlogical block 4024, where the procedure may end. Otherwise, processingflow may continue to logical block 4020 (labeled RESOURCE IS SERVICE?),where a test may determine whether the user input is indicative of theuser requesting a service 1810. If this test results in an affirmativeresult, processing flow may proceed to logical block 4022 where theservice 1810 may be provided, such as by spawning a process and/orthread as described hereinbefore with reference to FIG. 21B. Finally,processing flow may proceed back to 4004 as shown. It should beappreciated that, in embodiments, the connection to the database 1808that may be established during the first pass of the processing flowthrough 4004 may be a persistent connection and that subsequent passesthrough 4004 may simply check to see if the persistent connection isstill valid. If it is, processing flow may proceed immediately to 4008.If it isn't, the connection may be reestablished.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 40. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Inembodiments, the reputation service host 112 may provide servicesrelated to collection of reputation information 116′ providing warnings,alerts, and the like 114; providing analysis of reputation information122; monitoring changes 124; and/or making alternative recommendations130.

FIG. 41 shows a facilitation of privacy policy service. The proceduremay begin at the START logical block 4102 and proceed to the ACCESSDATABASE logical block 4104. In step 4104, a central processing facility1902 may connect to one of the databases 1808 (which may be referred toin this paragraph as “the database”). Processing flow may continue toLOAD DATA AND PRIVACY POLICY logical block 4108 where data and a privacypolicy may be selected from the database. Next, a test to determinewhether the data are associated with one of the users 1802 is conducted,as may be shown by the logical block 4110 (labeled USER DATA?). If theresult of the test is affirmative, processing flow may continue tological block 4114 (labeled USER'S OWN DATA?), where a test may beconducted to determine if the data belong to the user. If the result ofthe test at 4114 is affirmative, processing flow may continue, as shown,to the PROVIDE DATA logical block 4120, where the data may be providedto the user. From there, processing flow may continue to the END logicalblock 4124, where this procedure may end, perhaps producing a code,record, or other indication of completion of the procedure. However, ifthe result of the test at 4114 is negative, then processing flow maycontinue to a test that may determine whether the privacy policyindicates that the data are private, as shown by logical block 4118(labeled DATA ARE PRIVATE?). If the result of this test is negative,then processing flow may continue to logical block 4120, as shown.Otherwise, processing flow may continue to the DON'T PROVIDE DATAlogical block 4122, where the data may not be provided to the user andfrom which processing flow may then proceed to the END logical block4124. However, if the result of the test at 4110 is negative, thenprocessing flow may proceed to logical block 4112 (labeled USER BLOCKSDATA?), where a test may be conducted to determine if the privacy policycontains an indication that one of the users 1802 desires to block thedata. If this test results in an affirmative result, then processingflow may proceed as shown to logical block 4122. Otherwise, processingflow may proceed, also as shown, to logical block 4120.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 21B. For example, an interactive reputationplatform 100 may be used to provide reputation services through areputation service host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17.In embodiments, the reputation service host 112 may provide servicesrelated to collection of reputation information 116, providing warnings,alerts, and the like 114; providing analysis of reputation information122; monitoring changes 124; and/or making alternative recommendations130.

FIG. 42 shows a FACILITATON OF SCHEMA service 2128. The procedure maybegin at the START logical block 4202, with a schema being provided asinput to the procedure. Processing flow may proceed to the SCHEMA TYPEDETERMINES SERVICE logical block 4204. Here, a type associated with theschema may be determined, and this type may be used to direct theprocessing flow, as depicted. In the case that the type is deemed to bea schema associated with a firewall, processing flow may proceed tological block SERVICE FIREWALL SCHEMA 4208; if the type is deemedassociated with an object-oriented representation, processing flow mayproceed to logical block SERVICE OO-REP. SCEMA 4210; if the type isdeemed associated with XML, processing flow may proceed to logical blockSERVICE XML SCHEMA 4212; if the type is deemed associated with alibrary, processing flow may proceed to logical block SERVICE LIBRARYSCHEMA 4214; and if the type is deemed associated with a persistentitem, processing flow may proceed to logical block SERVICE PERSISTENTITEM SCHEMA 4218. Logical block 4208 may represent the provision of afunction related to a firewall, which may be described in the schema.For example and without limitation, the schema may describe a virtualprivate network configuration as it relates to the firewall. In thiscase, the function related to the firewall may be the establishment of aVPN connection to the firewall according to the configuration. This mayprovide a secure communication channel, which may persist beyond theexecution of this service 2128 and which may secure communicationsbetween or among components of the system 1800. Logical block 4210 mayrepresent the provision of a function related to an object-orientedrepresentation, which may be embodied by the schema. For example andwithout limitation, this function may provide a rendition of theobject-oriented representation according to Unified Modeling Language.This rendition may be graphical, such as may be embodied by an imagedata file, and/or it may be textual, such as may be embodied in an XMLMetadata Interchange (XMI) file. Logical block 4212 may represent theprovision of a function related to XML, which may be described and/orembodied by the schema. For example and without limitation, thisfunction may comprise a parsing, interpreting, writing, rewriting,storing, retrieving, protecting, encrypting, decrypting, or otherwiseprocessing XML. Logical block 4214 may represent the provision of afunction related to a library, such as a library with books and/or asoftware library, either of which may be described and/or embodied bythe schema. In the case where the library is of books, this function maywithout limitation enable looking up in, checking out from, checking into, purchasing from, subscribing to, and/or donating to the library. Inthe case where the library is a software library, this function maywithout limitation provide dynamic linking or other operative couplingto the library, documentation associated with the library, a functionaldescription of the library, a generalized flow diagram related to thelibrary, and so forth. Logical block 4218 may represent the provision ofa function related to a persistent item, which may be embodied by theschema. For example and without limitation, this function may compriseproviding persistent storage for a schema and/or a lookup mechanism bywhich a permanent or unchanging reference to the schema may bede-referenced. Thus it will be appreciated that, more generally, schemasmay capture a wide variety of substantive content, protocol andconfiguration data, state data, and so forth, any of which may beusefully processed in an electronic commerce context.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 42. For example, an interactive reputation platform100 may be used to provide reputation services through a reputationservice host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17. Inembodiments, the reputation service host 112 may provide servicesrelated to collection of reputation information 116, providing warnings,alerts, and the like 114; providing analysis of reputation information122; monitoring changes 124; and/or making alternative recommendations130.

FIG. 43 shows a transaction service that may be used with the systemsdescribed herein. The procedure may begin at the START logical block4302, with processing flow continuing as shown to the logical block 4304(labeled PAYER AUTH.?). This logical block may represent a test to seeif the payer has authorized a transaction. If the result of the test isnegative, processing flow may proceed to the REPORT ERROR logical block4314, where an error code or indication of error may be provided.Otherwise, processing flow may proceed to the logical block 4308(labeled ACCOUNTS SPECIFIED?) where a test may determine whether asource account was specified for the transaction. If the result of thetest is negative, processing flow may proceed as shown to logical block4314. Otherwise, processing flow may continue to logical block 4310where a test may determine whether a financial institution that may beassociated with the account authorizes the transaction. If the result ofthis test is negative, processing flow may proceed as shown to logicalblock 4314. Otherwise, processing flow may continue to the ISSUE PAYMENTlogical block 4312, by which the payment may be drawn from the sourceaccount and deposited into a destination account. Whether from logicalblock 4312 or logical block 4314, processing flow may proceed to the ENDlogical block 4318, where this procedure may end, perhaps producing acode, record, or other indication of completion of the procedure.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 21B. For example, an interactive reputationplatform 100 may be used to provide reputation services through areputation service host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17.In embodiments, the reputation service host 112 may provide servicesrelated to collection of reputation information 116, providing warnings,alerts, and the like 114; providing analysis of reputation information122; monitoring changes 124; and/or making alternative recommendations130.

FIG. 44 shows a FACILITATION OF AFFILIATE service 2122 that may be usedwith the systems described herein. The procedure may begin at the STARTlogical block 4402. Then, processing flow may continue to the testrepresented by logical block 4404, which may determine whether the useris an affiliate. An affiliate may be identified as such by itsmembership in an affiliate program and/or affiliate network, anindication of which may, without limitation, both be stored in one ofthe databases 1808 and be selected/referenced during the test in logicalblock 4404. If the result of this test is affirmative, processing flowmay continue to the ISSUE E-COMMERCE AFFILIATE REPORT logical block4414, where an e-commerce affiliate report may be issued to the user.This report may contain an aggregated or disaggregated view of referralsprovided by the affiliate and/or an account receivable associated withthe referrals. However, if the result of the test in logical block 4404is negative, processing flow may continue to a test that may berepresented by logical block 4408 (labeled USER WANTS TO BE AFLT.?),where a test may determine whether the user is interested in becoming anaffiliate. If the result of this test is affirmative, processing flowmay continue to the PROVIDE SPECIFICATION OF AFFILIATE PROGRAM logicalblock 4418, where the user may be provided with a legal and/orcontractual specification of the affiliate program, which may beprovided in a human-readable format (such as and without limitation aPDF document) and/or a computer-readable format (such as and withoutlimitation an XML file). From this point, the processing flow maycontinue to the ADD USER TO AFFILIATE NETWORK logical block 4420, wherethe user may be added to an affiliate network, such as by writing anindication of the user's inclusion in an affiliate network into one ofthe databases 1808. However, if the result of the test in logical block4410 is negative, then processing flow may continue to the testrepresented by the logical block 4412 (labeled LOG USER'S ACTIVITY).Here, an indication of an activity by the user that may have caused theactivation of this procedure may be written into one of the databases1808. For example and without limitation, the user may have selected apromotional Web link from an affiliate Web site for which no fee isassociated, but for which a log of user activity may be desired. Thisactivity may be logged. However, if the test at logical block 4410results in an affirmative result, processing flow may continue tological block 4422, where an update to an affiliate's account receivablemay be recorded, wherein the affiliate may be one of the users 1802 ofthe system 1800 and wherein the user may have taken an action associatedwith the affiliate (such as and without limitation selecting aparticular Web link), which may cause a fee to be due to the affiliate.Whether from logical block 4414, 4420, 4422, or 4412, processing flow,as shown, may continue to the END logical block 4424, where thisprocedure may end, perhaps producing a code or other indication ofcompletion of the transaction.

In embodiments, an interactive reputation platform 100 may be deployedand used in connection with any of the interactions described inconnection with FIG. 21B. For example, an interactive reputationplatform 100 may be used to provide reputation services through areputation service host 112 as described in connection with FIGS. 1-17.In embodiments, the reputation service host 112 may provide servicesrelated to collection of reputation information 116, providing warnings,alerts, and the like 114; providing analysis of reputation information122; monitoring changes 124; and/or making alternative recommendations130.

The systems and methods described herein relate to providing reputationbased services in connection with e-commerce interactions such as thosedescribed above. In general, e-commerce interactions may include one ormore of the sale of goods/services, advertising, recommendations,research, supplying and receiving metadata, pricing, communicating withaffiliates, communications, information, education, portals (e.g.yahoo!, AOL, MSN), blogs, location based services, Microsoft Officeactivities or other business application activities, updates, downloads,graphics, animation, pictures, video, television, movies, pay per view,subscriptions, registrations, audio, radio, music, file sharing, b2b,corporate, finance, or the like.

In embodiments, a user of a client 102 may want to purchase, offer forsale, auction, or otherwise participate in an e-commerce activityrelated to goods or services. A reputation service host 112 may beoperated in connection with the client 102 (e.g. as illustrated inconnection with FIGS. 1-17) during such interaction. In embodiments, thegoods/services may relate to adult items, apparel, audio and video,automotive, baby items, baby/wedding registry, beauty items, bed andbath items, books, camera/photo items, cell phones and service, computerand video games, computers, digital books, DVDs, educational items,electronics, financial services, friends and favorites items, furnitureand décor, gourmet food, health and personal care items, home and gardenitems, images, information, jewelry and watches, kitchen and housewares, magazine subscriptions, maps, movie show-times, music, musicalinstruments, office products, outdoor living items, pet supplies,pharmaceuticals, real estate, shoes, software, sports and outdoorsitems, tools and hardware, toys and games, travel, videos, weather, wishlist items, yellow pages, or the like.

In embodiments, a user of a client 102 may want to interact with anadvertisement, advertise, or otherwise interact in an e-commerceactivity related to advertising. A reputation service host 112 may beoperated in connection with the client 102 (e.g. as illustrated inconnection with FIGS. 1-17) during such interaction. In embodiments,advertising may relate to an advertisement aggregator, an all ads site,attention brokering, a bid to advertise, communication with end user, acoupon, dynamic ad insertion (e.g. DoubleClick), editorial/adrelationship, permission-based advertisement, promotions, spam/E-mail,classified ads, or the like. In embodiments, the classified ads fromabove may include real estate ads, vehicle ads, used good ads, new goodads, services, or the like.

In embodiments, a user of a client 102 may want to interact with ane-commerce activity through a network facility (e.g. network 108 asdescribed in connection with FIG. 1). In embodiments, the networkfacility may include Akamai, BitTorrent, P2P, or other such techniques.

In embodiments, user recommend/research activities may includebuying-based behavior, click-based behavior, collaborative filtering,customer reviews, editorial reviews, machine learning, reputationmeasures, or the like. In embodiments, metadata information may includedynamic modification of US, browser navigation, navigation based on pastbehavior, or the like. In embodiments, user pricing/research may includeagents, auctions (e.g. EBay), catalog aggregator, pricing comparisonengine, ratings, reverse auction (e.g. Priceline), shopping bots, or thelike. In embodiments, affiliates may include an affiliates program. Inembodiments, communications may include email, voice over IP, IM, chat,messaging, picture mail, video mail, voice mail, phone calls, Webinteractions, or the like. In embodiments, information may includesearching, news, travel information, weather information, localinformation, research, or the like. In embodiments, the searching asshown above may be for images, video, text, audio, groups, localinformation, news, finance information, travel information, weatherinformation, research, or the like. In embodiments, educationinformation or activities may include on-line classes, referencematerial, registration, and the like. In embodiments, portals (e.g.yahoo!, AOL, MSN) may be for finance activities, email, messaging, IM,chat, video download/upload, picture download/upload, audiodownload/upload, music download/upload, directories, shopping (e.g.e-commerce), entertainment, games, cards, and the like. In embodiments,the cards as shown above may include greeting cards, holiday cards,event cards (e.g. birthday), or the like. In embodiments, blogs mayinclude posting, searching, syndication, or the like. In embodiments,location based services may include mobile services, desktop services,or the like. In embodiments, Microsoft Office activities may includeWord, Excel, Power Point, Outlook, Outlook Express, Project, InternetExplorer, or the like. In embodiments, animation may include FlashMacromedia, or the like. In embodiments, corporate activities mayinclude supply chain management, finance activity, human resources,sales, marketing, engineering, software development, customer support,product information, data mining, data integration, or the like. Inembodiments, finance activities may include personal banking, creditcard Websites, PayPal and other online payment systems, brokerageWebsites, retirement/401k/IRA Websites, business, or the like. Inembodiments, the personal banking as shown above may include loans,banking, or the like. In embodiments, the loans as shown above mayinclude mortgages, auto loans, personal loans, or the like. Inembodiments business activities may include loans, banking, or the like.In embodiments, business loans as shown above may include mortgages,vehicle loans, or the like.

It should be understood that the embodiments described herein may relateto an interaction with a Website, portion of a Website, contentassociated with a Website, content accessible through a network,information accessible through a network, a network accessible item,virtually any other network interaction, interactions with userinterfaces, interactions with software applications, interactions withobjects that are embedded in user interfaces or software applications(e.g. embedded URLs, links, or the like), or interactions with data ormetadata that represent or are derived from or that relate to any of theforegoing.

While e-commerce has been discussed extensively, and other examples ofuseful environments for reputation services have been provided, numerousadditional applications exist. In general, the reputation systems andmethods described herein may be usefully invoked in any environmentwhere users might benefit from reputation information; This may include,for example, search and download of privacy and security software, suchas anti-spyware software, anti-virus software, anti-spam software,security software, file sharing software, music sharing software, videosharing software. This may also include interactions with Web sites forcharitable donations, intermediaries for financial transactions, and Websites that purport to provide reputation data, such as Web sites aimedat discouraging users from entering into financial transactions with acompany who's product does not work well or that have poor user ratings.Another useful application of reputation services may be to preventinadvertent navigation to sites that knock-off well known company names,brands, or URLs with near facsimiles intended to confuse consumers.

Similarly, while many of the embodiments herein are described inconnection with browser interfaces, it should be understood thatreputation services may be used with any software that interacts withcontent through a network, including open source (e.g. Mozilla, Firefox,or other open source browser), peer-to-peer (e.g. Kazaa, or a similarpeer-to-peer program), proprietary (e.g. Microsoft's Internet Exploreror Apple's Safari), platform specific (e.g. using a protocol designedfor a particular device), or other software, platforms, orconfigurations. For example, a mobile communication facility (e.g. acell phone) may use proprietary, platform-specific, code to interfacewith the Internet in a manner that could benefit from the reputationservices provided herein.

More generally, the reputation-based systems and methods describedherein may be usefully applied in a wide range of network-based andcomputer-based environments. For example, reputation systems may beapplied in the context of peer-to-peer networks or other file sharingand/or socially oriented environments such as systems for searching andsharing screen savers, music, song lyrics, TV shows, movies, DVDs, CDs,DVD ripping and burning software, CD ripping and burning software, videoclips, smiley faces, fonts, backgrounds, themes, skins, celebrityinformation, wallpaper, cursors, games, contests, ring tones, podcasts,and any other soft content suitable for distribution over a network. Thereputation service may, in particular, protect users of suchpeer-to-peer, file sharing, and/or social networks from receivingspyware, adware, or other malware, as well as protect users from beingadded to an e-mail spam list, becoming a victim of a browser,application, or operating system exploit, or being otherwise subjectedto security and privacy risks in a network environment.

All such modifications and adaptations as would be clear to one of skillin the art are intended to fall within the scope of the systems andmethods described herein.

While the invention has been described in connection with certainpreferred embodiments, other embodiments may be understood by those ofordinary skill in the art and are encompassed herein. All documentreferenced herein are hereby incorporated by reference.

1. A method, comprising: receiving an indicator of an attemptedinteraction of a user with an item of website content; and presentingone or more indicia of a website's reputation to the user attempting tointeract with the website content; wherein the act of presenting theindicia is in response to the user's attempted interaction with thewebsite.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the indicia is providedthrough a reputation indicator within a graphical user interface.
 3. Themethod of claim 2, wherein the reputation indicator is presented on atool bar.
 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the reputation indicator ispresented on menu bar.
 5. The method of claim 2, wherein the reputationindicator is presented on a navigation bar.
 6. The method of claim 2,wherein the reputation indicator is updated upon each attempted websiteinteraction.
 7. The method of claim 6, wherein the update involvesreceiving information from a reputation service.
 8. The method of claim7, wherein the reputation service employs a reputation server.
 9. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the indicia of the website's reputationcomprises indicia of a website's reputation for treatment of personalinformation.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the indicia of thewebsite's reputation comprises indicia of a website's reputation forproviding unwanted content. 11-52. (canceled)
 53. A system, comprising:a receiving facility adapted to receive an indicator of an attemptedinteraction of a user with an item of website content; and apresentation facility adapted to present one or more indicia of awebsite's reputation to the user attempting to interact with the websitecontent; wherein the act of presenting the indicia is in response to theuser's attempted interaction with the website.
 54. The system of claim53, wherein the indicia is provided through a reputation indicatorwithin a graphical user interface.
 55. The system of claim 54, whereinthe reputation indicator is presented on a tool bar.
 56. The system ofclaim 54, wherein the reputation indicator is presented on menu bar. 57.The system of claim 54, wherein the reputation indicator is presented ona navigation bar.
 58. The system of claim 54, wherein the reputationindicator is updated upon each attempted website interaction.
 59. Thesystem of claim 58, wherein the update involves receiving informationfrom a reputation service.
 60. The system of claim 59, wherein thereputation service employs a reputation server.
 61. The system of claim53, wherein the indicia of the website's reputation comprises indicia ofa website's reputation for treatment of personal information.
 62. Thesystem of claim 53, wherein the indicia of the website's reputationcomprises indicia of a website's reputation for providing unwantedcontent. 63-104. (canceled)